MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > CONGRATULATIONS: WE ALL OWN a CONDO in t...

CONGRATULATIONS: WE ALL OWN a CONDO in the SCAM MAN's TOWER NOW!!!

posted 6 years ago by joi2049 (5572)
32 replies | jump to latest

THANKS to the way MUELLER CONFISCATED MONEY and PROPERTY from MANAFORT, ALL of we TAXPAYERS are now the PROUD OWNERS of a CONDO inside of the BUILDING that has the SCAM MAN'S NAME on the outside of it.

It's also the SAME PLACE where SCAM MAN JR. had the MEETING with all of those RUSSIANS and then tired to LIE about it and say the meeting had been ABOUT ADOPTIONS.

Anyhow, on her show last night, RACHEL also ANNOUNCED that we'll also be GETTING some PHOTOS soon of our NEW CONDO, so we can see the FLOOR PLAN, and decide who will get which room, and DECIDE where the FURNITURE GOES, etc. :)

The even better NEWS is how we're also MUCH RICHER NOW due to the way MUELLER also CONFISCATED MORE than $40 MILLION form MANAFORT, which not only covers the cost of the RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, but LEAVES US with LOTS of MILLIONS LEFT OVER after paying for it.

So CONGRATULATIONS to ALL of us for the way that we've now AQUIRED the CONDO in the SCAM MAN's TOWER and LOTS of other MANAFORT MONEY too!!!!

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

THANKS to the way MUELLER CONFISCATED MONEY and PROPERTY from MANAFORT, ALL of we TAXPAYERS are now the PROUD OWNERS of a CONDO inside of the BUILDING that has the SCAM MAN'S NAME on the outside of it.

Oh wah!

Try not to imagine how much the value will spike when it gets sold off with THAT kind of Watergatesque provenance, lol!

It is to laugh, at every imagined flop sweat leftard "outrage" - all in caps lock of course...lol..

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Another Trumper who is angry that the Mueller investigation paid for itself.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Because who doesn't support jackboot gubmint thugs setting up property confiscation entrapments, eh?

Wither Carter Page, eh?

Some joi in that I presume...;-(

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Manafort entrapped himself when he laundered money for corrupt Ukrainians and Russian oligarchs.

Carter Page tried getting in on that racket but couldn't make the waves Manafort did. The FBI kept checking in on Carter to see if he made any headway but nope all he could muster was a position in Trump's camp. The FBI was looking at him for years. Trumpers only got angry about it when Trump's name entered the picture.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Hunter Biden entrapped himself when he laundered money for corrupt Ukrainians and Russian oligarchs.

FIFY again, lol...

https://pjmedia.com/trending/did-biden-save-this-ukraine-firm-responsible-for-1-8b-in-missing-aid-his-son-is-on-the-board/

In the last days of the Obama administration, Vice President Joe Biden took a "swan song" trip to Ukraine, a notoriously corrupt country where he had been the administration's "point person." On the eve of this trip, the country announced it would end a criminal investigation into a company connected to the loss of $1.8 billion in aid funding — a company whose board of directors included Biden's son Hunter.

The Biden family's dealings with this Ukrainian company involved getting one of the country's most notorious mob bankers, Ihor Kolomoisky, off the U.S. government visa ban list. Under Biden's leadership, $3 billion in aid went to Ukraine, and his son's company was implicated in the disappearance of $1.8 billion of that money.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Think for yourself man. You keep posting all these links to non sequiturs. If you want to prove that Joe Biden laundered money for Russian oligarchs through corrupt Ukraine then be my guest. But the problem you will have is the same problem you had with Obama's Kenyan birth certificate. There's nothing to go on.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Think for yourself man. You keep posting all these links to non sequiturs.

Manafort = sequitur?

Biden = "non sequitur"?

How's that work anyway?

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Manafort laundered money through the Ukraine. There is proof of it which is why Manafort is now serving time as well as for his witness tampering. Where's Biden's money laundering? Where is any republican saying to indict Biden? Is every republican prosecutor part of the Deep State?

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Manafort laundered money through the Ukraine.

Manafort isn't running for President, Biden the groper is.

Deal.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

lol wut?

Thats not a deal. Thats a derp.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Carter Page tried getting in on that racket but couldn't make the waves

Nope - innocent from the get go.

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/more-proof-the-trump-russia-collusion-never-happened/

https://amgreatness.com/2018/08/04/where-is-carter-pages-exoneration-by-the-fbi/
The only man still not charged with any crime is Carter Page. Two years later, the Trump campaign volunteer who was accused of being a secret agent for the Russians is a free man. And the FBI has yet to explain why.
It’s not as if the FBI is afraid to explain to the public why certain public figures are innocent of suspected crimes, right?

Two years ago this month, top officials of the Obama Administration launched a politically motivated investigation and worked with their accomplices in the media to harass, intimidate and defame Carter Page. Two years later, he has not been found guilty of any crime.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

As I said he couldn't make the waves. Carter Page was nothing more than a suspicion because of the Russian miscreants he palled around with. But at the end he was nothing more than a suspicion. Thats all fine with me. If there's no crime then there should be no time. But to Trumpers it was an attack that the FBI was even looking at Page. Not because Page was Carter. But because Carter Page was in Trump's camp.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

As I said he couldn't make the waves.

Yes innocence is rather like that.

Thanks for admitting as much.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Well its no problem because I never said otherwise.

However if there was a Deep State organizing against Trump's campaign then Carter Page's goose would've been cooked as he was the #1 piece of meat primed for the roaster. Carter Page is just more proof that its all in your head.

Similar thing with Mueller protecting Flynn. If Flynn is doing the good work against the Deep State then he too would've been cooked. Instead Mueller is doing everything he can to get Flynn his freedom.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Well its no problem because I never said otherwise.

Your full exoneration of Mr. Page is a unique distraction.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

I mean full exoneration is a bit of a stretch. Page still needs to be watched. You don't get to pal around with Russian spies just to be discovered doing it, let go, and allowed to do it without any eyes on you. If Page can stay out of Europe then he'll have my exoneration.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Page still needs to be watched.

You truly are as creepy as anyone Orwell ever penned in his now living political "nonfiction"..

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

You truly are the king of non sequiturial distractions in every conversation you have.

Hillary can't even have another private email server without you hollering about it. But Page should be allowed to consort with Russian spies all he wants :)

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

You truly are the king of non sequiturial distractions in every conversation you have.

This "needs to be watched" is wholly emblematic of the deep state id- it seems your allegiance to your previously lauded "shadow government" is monolithic.

Now I don't mind illustrating that for readership, but I frankly find your condescending attitude as appalling as any retail politician's.

As for Shillary - send her a box of hammers, she knows how to use them.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Page should be allowed to consort with Russian spies all he wants

Of course it is proved he has not, so there's that.

In fact he worked WITH the FBI to catch them:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/chrisreeves/2018/02/05/doj-documents-show-carter-page-helped-fbi-catch-russian-spies-n2444651

Department of Justice court records from 2015 have provided details about how Carter Page cooperated with FBI agents in exposing Russian spies working inside the United States.

The information above formed a part of the DOJ and FBI's basis for charging Sporyshev and Podobnyy with conspiracy to violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act, as the rest of Monaghan's sealed complaint goes on to detail.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

Its emblematic of the deep state to watch people who engage in treasonous activity?

Just think how often you call a person a traitor. The FBI has the balls to gather evidence first. You're the coward that does it out of the blue just because someone disagrees with Trumptards. And then you point the finger at those who seek evidence first.

You are pathetic.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Its emblematic of the deep state to watch people who engage in treasonous activity?

Are you on their watch list?

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Just think how often you call a person a traitor. The FBI has the balls to gather evidence first.

Before grudgingly exonerating Trump of any Russian collusion.

Heh.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

If they exonerated Trump then you wouldn't be here. Mueller did the opposite. You are spamming the board because you were triggered by Mueller :)

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

If they exonerated Trump then you wouldn't be here. You are here because Mueller did the opposite.

Since they did your thesis is rejected.

NO Russian collusion or conspiracy was found.

Cope.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

I completely support Trump not serving any time for Russia helping him to win the election. He put Rex in to get the pipeline deal but thankfully the big-mouthed democrats put an end to the ExxonMobile scam Trump and Putin wanted to pull on the American people.

But they did find collusion between Russia and Trump's campaign. Stone, a few others, and perhaps even Donny Jr will have to face the hot seat for it.

On top of it they found obstruction of justice with Trump being guilty himself. Again its not something worthy of prison time. But if repubs can attempt to throw Clinton out of the White House for getting a blowjob then democrats can most certainly throw Trump out for stifling an investigation into Russia's meddling with the 2016 election. Only Trump and the Trumpers claim Russia did not interfere. The rest of the world shakes their heads at you.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

I completely support Trump not serving any time for Russia helping him to win the election.

Given they had no appreciable impact on the election that's a good thing.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

So if it had an appreciable impact on the election then he should go to jail?

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Given he had NOTHING to do with them or any of their alleged electoral machinations you have your answer, now don't you dearie?

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 6 years ago

That was my answer. Yes. But you non sequitured to whether it had an impact on the election. Having an impact on an election should not be the determining factor on whether the recipient should go to jail or not.

That said Russia did try to sway the election. If you say its okay because we do it to Russia then you are crossing the line to traitor-ville. Its never okay for a foreign power to stifle our democracy. But thats what Trumpers seem to want. They want Russia to be free to interfere. And when pressed on it they fall back on stupid shit like "they had no appreciable impact on the election." Oh but they will try again.

I also can't wait for the "we told you so" moment the day a democrat wins with a lesser popular vote. When it happens I will still say we should get rid of the electoral college. But Trumpers will only complain if it happens to Trump.

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

But you non sequitured to whether it had an impact on the election. Having an impact on an election should not be the determining factor on whether the recipient should go to jail or not.

Because committing a crime doesn't mean you need to be prosecuted with actual "evidence" of said, lol!

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

.I also can't wait for the "we told you so" moment the day a democrat wins with a lesser popular vote.

That's that sleazy dog in the manger anti-American libitardia for you, always about payback, never what's good for the republic.