On MSNBC they keep talking about how the country has 2 ECONOMIES:
ONE for the RICH
One for those who are NOT RICH
And since the SCAM MAN gave HUGE TAX BREAKS to the RICH, and then BRAGS about having done so down at MAR A SWAMPO where he told them he'd just made them RICHER, it's also pretty clear which side of the ISSUE the SCAM MAN who ran the FAKE UNIVERSITY and the FAKE CHARITY stands on.
THE ISSUE: The rich keep getting richer while more Americans are getting left behind financially.
Income inequality has surged near levels last seen before the Great Depression. The average income for the top 1 percent of households climbed 7.7 percent last year to $1.36 million, according to tax data tracked by Emmanuel Saez, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley. That privileged sliver of the population saw pay climb at almost twice the rate of income growth for the other 99 percent, whose pay averaged a humble $48,768.
But why care how much the wealthy are making? What counts the most to any family is how much that family is bringing in. And that goes to the heart of the income-inequality debate: Most Americans still have yet to recover from the Great Recession, even though that downturn ended seven years ago. The average income for the 99 percent is still lower than it was back in 1998 after adjusting for inflation ...
One reason the income disparity is troubling for the nation is that it’s thinning out the ranks of the middle class
It's my understanding that WAGES have been STAGNENT since the 70's or back when TRICKY DICK NIXON was still in office and resigned in 74???
People have gotten a raise of 1 or 2% at times, but not enough to keep up with INFLATION, which is also demonstrated by the way it now takes 2 INCOMES now to purchase a home, whereas back in the 50's ONE INCOME was still enough to get one???
Americans keep working harder and producing more economic growth. But they’re not getting rewarded with any extra pay for it, according to a new report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI).
After the end of World War II, the country experienced decades of steady economic growth that also translated into steady increases in pay for the workers who were fueling it. As the report’s authors write, “For decades following the end of World War II, inflation-adjusted hourly compensation (including employer-provided benefits as well as wages) for the vast majority of American workers rose in line with increases in economy-wide productivity.”
But that link was severed starting in 1973. [/quote]
As you can see, this LINK is saying the problem begins in 73.
And it also says INCOMES risen by LESS THAN ONE PERCENT or only by 0.2 percent:
[quote]Compensation for the median worker ...
adjusted for inflation,
grew ... between 1973 and 2014 ...
(at) a 0.2 percent annual rate.
Yet net productivity grew at a 1.33 percent annual pace in the same time. Things have gotten even worse since 2000: net productivity has grown 21.6 percent since then, yet inflation-adjusted compensation for the median worker grew just 1.8 percent.
In other words, WORKERS have been GETING RIPPED OFF BIGTIME by the RICH FOLKS who run them for quite some time, or for much longer period of time than in the 80's ...
(which has also helped to create the CULT members who worship and adore the SCAM MAN who ran the FAKE UNIVERSITY and the FAKE CHARITY ... who keeps telling them the BIG FAT LIE about how he can MAKE THEM as RICH as HIM ... as he MAKES HIMSELF RICHER by selling the SUCKERS those GOOFY RED HATS that they buy from him).
I never did understand the voodoo reference or anything else the SHRUBS use to say (especially the BABY BUSH version of the POTUS). reply share
I haven't seen any legitimate countermeasure to ensure that a majority of Americans have access to wealthy opportunities other than the current system.
Taxing the rich only moves money into the Federal piggy bank, not Americans' pockets.
Taxing the rich only moves money into the Federal piggy bank, not Americans' pockets.
What goes into the FEDERAL PIGGY BANK also comes back out of it again and goes to pay for stuff like our MILITARY, and our SOCIAL SECURITY system, and for our ROADS & BRIDGES, and for the COPS and FIREMEN that protect us, etc.
So when the RICH KEEP using LOOP HOLES to keep from PAYING anything at all (like AMAZON did this year), that also enables them to USE what the REST of US pay for (roads and BRIDGES), which also means they're taking ADVANTAGE of us by not paying ANY TAXES at all and then USING what we pay for them to USE.
And IF they'd PAY their FAIR SHARE, then OUR DEBT wouldn't keep GOING UP, and we wouldn't have to pay the OUTRAGEOUS INTEREST that we now owe on our DEBT.
And that would also enable us to be able to AFFORD many other things we need that we now can't afford to pay for due to the HIGH DEBT and the OUTRAGEOUS INTEREST we owe on that DEBT, due to the WAY THE RICH keep finding ways to NOT PAY what they should be paying.
It's like ALL of us have someone who's FREE LOADING off of us by sleeping on our SOFA, and is EATING OUR FOOD, wearing our clothes, and is also running up our UTILITY BILLS as well, but isn't willing to pay us anything for doing so.
That's what RICH PEOPLE who DON'T PAY TAXES are doing. FREELOADING off of the REST of us that they see as being SUCKERS.
That RICH WOMAN named LEONA... who went to jail … who ran HOTELS and was involved in REAL ESTATE like THE SCAM MAN … also BRAGGED ABOUT how only the LITTLE PEOPLE PAID TAXES.
Here's a VIDEO where DYLAN RADIGAN also explains what we need to do about it:
Bernie sanders has been saying what the guy in the YouTube video is screaming about for years and years and years and years. That screaming guy is wrong when he says no politician was addressing income inequality back then. Dead wrong.
The problem with BERNIE is the way he wants everyone to go to COLLEGE for FREE and he has NO WAY to PAY for that idea.
Unless he's also saying he wants to take away the money the RICH FAT CATS have STASHED OFF SHORE in places like the CAYMAN ISLANDS and use that for COLLEGE TUITION???
It would most likely also VANISH before he could ever manage to get his hands on it though. Because the moment he'd be elected the RICH would most likely just go HIDE it some place else.
Sorry about the PBS link not working. Now it work anymore for me either :(
Bernie wants to pay for college with a Wall Street speculation tax. So yes, he wants to tax the rich to get the money.
When people say his ideas are crazy or that there’s no way to pay for this or that, it’s because they haven’t listened to him or bothered to get answers. I don’t agree with everything he says but I believe he truly has his country’s best interest at heart not his own. I have never felt that way about any politician in my life.
That pbs link - maybe it contains a typo? There’s a p at the end.
Bernie wants to pay for college with a Wall Street speculation tax. So yes, he wants to tax the rich to get the money.
When people say his ideas are crazy or that there’s no way to pay for this or that, it’s because they haven’t listened to him or bothered to get answers. I don’t agree with everything he says but I believe he truly has his country’s best interest at heart not his own. I have never felt that way about any politician in my life.
;-p
But the Congressional Budget Office shot Bernie's numbers down in flames, among others:
Key Findings:
A majority of the revenue raised by the Sanders plan would come from a new 6.2 percent employer-side payroll tax, a new 2.2 percent broad-based income tax, and the elimination of tax expenditures relating to healthcare.
According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, the plan would significantly increase marginal tax rates and the cost of capital, which would lead to 9.5 percent lower GDP over the long term.
On a static basis, the plan would lead to 10.56 percent lower after-tax income for all taxpayers and 17.91 percent lower after-tax income for the top 1 percent. When accounting for reduced GDP, after-tax incomes of all taxpayers would fall by at least 12.84 percent.
Economic Impact
According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Senator Bernie Sanders’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 9.5 percent in the long run. The plan would lead to 4.3 percent lower wages, an 18.6 percent smalller capital stock, and 6.0 million fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income.
And you DO know that Bernie has never succeeded at one capitalistic thing in his entire life, don't you? The list of his failures in the free market is information dense.
As of 2014, about 70 percent of Americans took the standard deduction, while others chose to itemize. However, the standard deduction is going up this year. Previously, the standard deduction was $6,350 with a personal exemption of $4,050. In 2018 and following years, these will be combined into a single $12,000 standard deduction. For married filing jointly, it’s $24,000.
Child Tax Credit Change
The child tax credit is going up to $2,000 per qualifying child and will be refundable up to $1,400. This is very good news. While a non-refundable credit offsets the tax you owe but won’t generate a refund, a refundable credit still earns you a refund even if you don’t owe any taxes. The child must be under the age of 17 at the end of the pertinent tax year in order to qualify for the child tax credit. As many child dependents as you have in that year, you can earn that many child tax credits, too.
A single filer's deduction increases from $6,350 to $12,000. The deduction for married and joint filers increases from $12,700 to $24,000. It reverts back to the current level in 2026. It's estimated that 94% of taxpayers will take the standard deduction. That will save them time in preparing their taxes.
The Act increases the Child Tax Credit from $1,000 to $2,000. Even parents who don't earn enough to pay taxes can claim the credit up to $1,400. It increases the income level from $110,000 to $400,000 for married tax filers.
It allows parents to use 529 savings plans for tuition at private and religious K-12 schools. They can also use the funds for expenses for home-schooled students.
It allows a $500 credit for each non-child dependent. The credit helps families caring for elderly parents.
reply share
I got my yearly wage "increase" in March. It was what I kind of expected, less than 2% (1.88 to be exact). When my supervisor told me the figure and looked at me for any response, I just said "uh huh." Don't know if they were expecting a "thank you" but it wasn't coming, not from me at least.