MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > The US Needs YOU..TODAY

The US Needs YOU..TODAY


In lieu of circular arguments and therapeutic venting provided by IMDB, I suggest getting more bang for your taxpayer buck by contacting your Reps. Don't like a policy? send a quick email to your Senator or Congressperson. Or, you can call.

It DOES make a difference (less so if you just blast out to folks who aren't your reps, cuz they will just forward your concerns to the appropriate congressional person). They do take their constituents seriously, and do keep tabs, like: 400 calls pro whatever, 55 calls con whatchamicallit. Plus, you will get a letter in return -- if you don't, you have a Rep who operates a sloppy, ineffective office.

As such, I call out all Americans to contact their Senators today (the earlier the better). There is a vote scheduled for Scott Pruitt. If you give two licks about protecting our rivers, lakes, oceans, AIR then check out this dude's record. This shouldn't be a partisan issue, unless you're all for the dude that drug his feet on enforcing regs on poultry farms (coincidentally, big donors) allowing over 200,000 tons of chicken "debris" (an elegant term for $hit) to be-foul (ha) rivers and rendering some city water unsafe.

Remember Flint and the lead crisis? Pruitt thinks it should be ok for some Mercury to be allowed to be disposed in/near rivers/streams as seen fit by companies. When asked at his committee hearing what was an "acceptable" level of mercury in drinking water, he said he did not know. If he doesn't know, then how can he know it's safe at any level? And ask yourself: what level do you feel safe injesting, or giving to your kids/grandkids? Do you think it's best to defer to a corporation -- with shareholders and the bottom-line as the deciding factor --to have the final say in what that level is safe? Gosh, there are never any problems when corporations operate w/out any independent oversight.

It's no secret he simply copied/pasted the oil industry language when suing the EPA over a dozen times. Oh and guess how much $$$ he got from those folks?

Maybe of particular interest to any American, he refused to provide any documents per FOIA requests and not until yesterday was ordered by an OK court to provide thousands of documents. He was not properly vetted (such a surprise coming from the Trumtin team), & was only voted out of committee by Republicans (as the Dems protested his nomination).

Republican Sen. Susan Collins has already spoken out publicly, announcing she will vote against him. Look, over-regulation is a burden to our economy, and a lot of times unintentionally effects small businesses more than the larger intended targets (ala Dodd-Frank). But an all out roll-back of logical, rational, rules that have resulted in cleaner air, rivers, streams and protected (a vital environmental tent pole) wetlands. The sky above LA used to be like Beijing. Lakes were the butt of jokes in terms of two-headed fish and unsafe to dip your toes into. We used to agree w/out a partisan snits that it's just plain common sense for our quality of life, and the nation's sustained viability, to protect our lands from the cost of unchecked greed.

Contact your Senators today! Ask them to err on the side of clean air/water and stop this mis-matched nominee. It's like the fox in charge of the henhouse!

reply

Get a life!
...or at least one outside of your parent's basement.

reply

Uhhhh... So insulting a stranger for encouraging participation in their Gvmnt is indicative of basement dwelling and that I don't have a life? Whassa matter Thinker? You don't know your reps? Can't even figure out how to look em up cuz your deep thoughts are being devoted to these sweet toddler burns? Oh my, I dare say I am mortally wounded from your hillbilly wit.

Now run along. Aren't you going to be late to the job where you're required to wear that goofy plastical nametag: HELLO! My name is: BillyDwayneBob? ((Named after at least one of your father's, or uncles or both...)

reply

ThinkMuch?
Apparently not!

reply

I'm already involved calling senators and Congressman to say that I support Trump.

I do so love though that liberals were ok with Obama killing protected bald eagles in favor of wind farms:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/us-extends-permits-to-30-yrs-for-eagles-wind-power/

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Friday extended the length of permits that allow wind farms and other operations to accidentally kill protected eagles to 30 years, drawing fire from wildlife conservationists.

The move to offer permits of up to three decades, from a previous maximum of five years, had been urged by the wind energy industry but was attacked by a leading wildlife group as a "stunningly bad move."
The Interior Department said the change in policy would help protect eagles, which can be killed when they collide with wind turbines and other structures, and allow the development of renewable energy and other projects designed to operate for decades.

"Renewable energy development is vitally important to our nation's future, but it has to be done in the right way," said Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell.
Wildlife conservationists, however, disputed the claims that eagles would be protected by the permit extensions.
The change will provide legal protection for the likely lifespan of wind farms that obtain permits and undertake "advanced conservation practices" to avoid killing bald eagles, the bird depicted on the national seal of the United States, and gold eagles.
Companies must also commit to take additional measures if they exceed their permit limits or if new information suggests eagle populations are being affected.
The National Audobon Society, a bird-focused conservation group, said Interior's move was misguided and that the group was keeping "all options" open to challenge the rule.
'OUTRAGEOUS'
"Instead of balancing the need for conservation and renewable energy, Interior wrote the wind industry a blank check," Audubon President and CEO David Yarnold said in a statement. "It's outrageous that the government is sanctioning the killing of America's symbol, the bald eagle."
In a blog posting, John Anderson, director of siting policy for the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), said the permit program would protect more eagles, not fewer. The group said its industry does more to address its impacts on eagles than other, greater causes of eagle fatalities known to wildlife experts.
The AWEA pointed out that the eagle "take" permit "was not developed for, nor is it specific to, the wind industry".
The permits can be sought by "all sources of human-caused eagle mortality," including oil and gas exploration and production, mining, military bases, airports, cell towers and utility lines, AWEA said.
Thousands of birds of various species - not just eagles - are known to die in the United States each year in collisions with giant wind turbines, power lines and other structures.
Fatalities of golden eagles at modern wind facilities represent less than 2 percent of documented sources of human-caused eagle deaths, and "only a few" bald eagles have died in collisions in the history of the industry, AWEA said.
The move is part of the Obama administration's push to promote wind and other forms of so-called green energy.

reply

Sorry, Obama is windsailing and has little impact on the future of our nation's natural resources. Didn't even bother with your time-wasting article. Get over Obama and Hillary. Bone up on the great achievements coming out of the Trumtin admin, and then we can dialogue about something that has impact.

Good for you. Sincerely! RE:Contacting your Senators.

Tho, I so hope you simply said you support Trumtin. That won't mean bubpkiss in terms of the Pruitt tally....

What's that ole'timey video game sound when the last pac man dies? That's what I'm hearing....

reply

Didn't even bother with your time-wasting article.

I can imagine why, killing protected bald eagles in favor of a windmill must have gotten your "Green" panties in a twist.

reply

It's funny how the only way Trumpkins here can think of to make Trump look good is by finding fault with two former presidents (Obama and Bill Clinton) and a person who ran for president but lost. By the way... it's not working.

reply

It's funny how the only way Trumpkins here can think of to make Trump look good is by finding fault with Obama

Solyndra

reply