They should investigate her death as foul play.
She was only 96 and died so suddenly. That only leads me to one conclusion: foul play.
shareI'm not sure about this but I would question whether Liz Truss can legitimately be the Prime Minister.
Could Elizabeth really have been in a fit state to have appointed her just two days ago or was the whole thing staged?
I was joking. She clearly died of old age.
shareI appreciated that.
But what about this Truss angle - Could you really be in a position to appoint a PM and die of old age within 48 hours? I'm not so sure...
Could be coincidental. She was 96 after all.
shareWhat could be coincidental? I don't follow...
shareThat she was appointed PM shortly before the Queen died.
shareOh yeah sure that's coincidental.
But have you seen someone die of old age? It's not a boom! they're gone kind of thing.
Could she really have been in a fit state to appoint Truss just 48 hrs before?
Maybe she passed her duties to Charles?
shareYes, your appeal to ignorance style argument does not prove anything, insisting no evidence exists to prove she diedof old age is evidence she did not or some conspiracy old age means very little medically it could be heart failure a heart attack is very fast I think you would agree
Just because she was old doesn't mean she had dementia you can be mentally well and die of physical ailments
It is your burden to prove the conspiracy, not anyone else's to disprove it
Yes, your appeal to ignorance style argument does not prove anything, insisting no evidence exists to prove she diedof old age is evidence she did not or some conspiracy old age means very little medically...
Could you repeat that in English please? I literally have no idea what you are trying to say here... share
YES YOU DO.
shareWorld English or American
Appeal to ignorance is an informal fallacy that tries to claim something is true because no evidence has been presented to prove it wrong
Basically I am saying your conspiracy theory lacks significant evidence in support.
Coincidences exist circumstantial evidence is not very convincing,
Did you mean to reply to me or the OP?
I never made any "conspiracy" theories and you said I was "insisting no evidence exists to prove she died of old age". I insisted absolutely nothing of the kind...
You did even if you don't understand your own argument you are trying to make it sound like death of old age has not been proven or is still unlikely with no evidence to support the claim.
No. I made no such claim whatsoever. That's why I asked if you meant to reply to the OP.
Go back up and re-read the thread and specifically quote where I "make it sound like death of old age has not been proven" if you are actually addressing me...
I think the appointment is mostly a symbolic ceremony, basically the queen has no choice in the matter.
The queen should have reserved powers, but unless in extreme circumstances I don't think she was supposed to use them.
I don't understand this conspiracy theory. What difference would it have made? If she dies Charles immediately becomes king and Truss is appointed anyway. Is Charles (unpopular already) going to defy Parliament as his first official act? Not legitimate? This sounds a lot like "MBGA" to me (Make Britain Great Again). Trust me, you don't want a 1/6 of your own.
share... basically the queen has no choice in the matter.
If you look at the staged pictures of her "appointing" Liz Truss this seems quite clear.
The back of her hands are black. Something was clearly very wrong with her. Whomever was responsible for making her putting her in that position at that stage should be ashamed of themselves. share
That is true. Her health should already be in poor state, but I think in the end it was her decision.
shareIf she couldn't perform her royal duties, I think she would have to abdicate. For whatever reasons she did not want that.
share"Could you really be in a position to appoint a PM and die of old age within 48 hours? I'm not so sure..."
It'd be hard to prove either way. Unless you are having your mental faculties tested every minute of every day, unless you die of old age 'on cue', they won't have a test from 24 hours previous.
I'd still trust her judgement over Philip's in any case, though.