now she can't make sequels to any of her old films
unless the explain that her character had a sex change.
shareAre any of them worth a sequel?
share
MovieChat Forums > Elliot Page Discussion > now she can't make sequels to any of her...
Something tells me casting directors won't be rushing to get her signed on to their films unless they're virtue signaling...
shareWhy not? It's called acting.
shareNo, it's called femalefacing.
shareare u trying to say that's it's ok to give a female role to a male actor?
the patriarchy has gone too far ...
A good actor can play anything
shareand still the left is always with pitchforks and torches when someone plays the "wrong" character.
a male playing a female is problematic from that point of view ...
plus: i would rather see a female playing a female.
You paint "the left" with very broad strokes. I'd say "the left" mainly wants socialized healthcare and good maintenance for the roads and bridges.
shareNot really
shareShe can #metoo herself.
shareI don't know about that. Page always had a slim, boy-like figure, which is probably what led to "top surgery" being practical in the first place. Unless Page were to go fully down the hormone and genital surgery road, Page could easily wear a wig and a padded bra and pretty much pull off the original female version of herself.
Surprisingly, the media has been discussing Page's "top surgery" -- which seems to isolate the limit of Page's gender transformation to just looking like a boy. I get where a large breasted trans person might get a huge boost from a double mastectomy, and Page probably got even more of a boost because Page was so flat chested to begin with they could probably create a man's chest with less disfigurement.
This is the part where I lose my comprehension of gender transformation. If Page was really focused on gender dysphoria, wouldn't having a vagina be a continuous burden? Maybe for some rank and file folks, changing a vagina into a penis is too complex/expensive, but in theory, Page has enough money/celebrity to get the absolute state of the art in genital transformation.
But Page hasn't, and I wonder why. Perhaps even a state of the art surgically created penis lacks sufficient sexual function? I suspect nothing would be more unsatisfying than to physically transform into a man and then be rejected because of an odd, low-functioning penis. Or is it perhaps that Page is still a lesbian and having a penis complicates having lesbian relationships, even among woke lesbians sympathetic to transgenderism?
I don't fault Page for whatever transformation Page is going through, but it's very difficult to nail down to the logic here.
but it's very difficult to nail down the logic here.
That's because the whole thing is entirely devoid of logic, and rife with contradictions every way you look at it. share