Why Can't People Just Leave Him Alone?

All of those are too vaguely defined and won't hold up in a court of law.

To be fair to the Reverend Charles Dodgson, I don't believed he ever abused any children, and that he was a paedophile who, thankfully, controlled his instincts.

Except such kindness isn't shown by SJW revisionists toward, say, John Wayne. If they want to play by those dirty rules then Michael Jackson's deserves to go down in history as pedophile, even if the facts surrounding his true nature are in question. You want the light touch of forgiveness or the benefit of doubt? Then be sure to give it to crusty old white guys too.

He procured children. What part of that don't you get? He brought children into his bed who weren't his by blood. He is the one who has normalized that in you, his devoted flock. I was a huge fan of his back in the 80s. I had The Wall, Thriller, all the Jacksons albums. I even dressed as Michael for Halloween one year, even making my own sequined glove for it. I danced to Thriller at many a Halloween party. That's how big a fan of his I was. That was until 1993 and the first allegations. Then when I started to read more of his proclivities I started to fall out with him. His admission to Martin Bashir in sleeping with children in his bed as well as advocating for others to sleep with children just turned my stomach. This is again by his own admission.

https://www.mjfacts.com/

The first paragraphs of that page reads:

It’s undeniable that Michael Jackson was a great entertainer. It’s also undeniable that he had a dark side, and if you delve deeper than fan sites or sycophantic media examples aren’t hard to find. Delve too shallowly though, and you will find that some paint Jackson as a kind of evil madman who committed unspeakable acts. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, Jackson was neither saint nor devil, but human. On this site we try and reveal facts about Jackson that fan websites don’t want you to know. Fans will try to present Jackson as some kind of martyr, but if he is a martyr for anything it is as someone who was totally inappropriate towards children and used them for his own selfish desires. That’s not to say he molested children, nobody apart from the boys he spent time with alone can know that (although many have spoken up and said that he is a molester, and I believe them), but he had bizarre psychological needs and had a compulsion to sleep with children without any regard for the consequences those children may have suffered.

As for Jackson’s predilection for sleepovers, it bears repeating here that he spent hundreds of nights sharing the same bed one-on-one with boys. This is not normal. He enjoyed sleeping with boys. He said there was nothing wrong with it, and even said all adults should sleep with children. That’s the argument he plainly made. You can believe your eyes, ears, and brain on this matter, or you can lie. Those are your only two choices.

And therein lies the problem. Predictably, shamefully, most MJ fans, and even some non-fans, have chosen the latter. On the web, or Facebook, or Twitter, it doesn’t take long to find people who believe that criticizing Jackson for sleeping with children is somehow wrong. I have had many Internet arguments because I don’t think it’s OK to describe adults, or Michael Jackson in particular, sleeping with unrelated children as something positive.

These people, the apologists, fall mainly into two different groups: Either they have decided that the accusation that Jackson slept with kids must be false, even if there is plenty of evidence proving otherwise; or they have decided that, hey, maybe it isn’t so bad for an adult man to sleep with young boys after all.

I want to focus on that second group, because I have encountered many of them over the last few years, and I find them particularly nauseating. These people never had this revelation when Catholic priests took young boys into their bed, or when any other celebrity participated in similar forms of deviancy. They lived their whole lives feeling quite certain that adult men shouldn’t be taking young boys into their bed, until their favorite pop star informed them otherwise. They were willing to abandon or at least re-calibrate, at the drop of a hat, the most self-evident of all moral principles for the sake of defending Michael Jackson.

This shouldn’t be surprising. We know that a certain sort of person is almost always willing to put personality over principle. They latch onto a person — media member, politician, celebrity, etc. — and, having determined that this individual is a paragon of truth and virtue, they outsource all of their discernment, thinking, and moral contemplation to him. It takes too much energy for them to ponder the questions and morals of life themselves so they put their minds and their consciences on the shelf and wear a large badge that says, “Whatever that guy says.”

Great! So we will be bombarded with a barrage of crappy new music most of which would not exist were it not for Michael Jackson's influence.

If Jackson's music is to be banned, it's only fair that we ban Justin Timberlake and Justin Bieber's too, seeing as they owe their entire careers to Jackson's.

"Too may people don't want to accept what's been right in front of their eyes for decades."

You're right. Too many people can't spot circumstantial evidence when it's in front of them. Irrationality is a difficult thing to accept.

There's a word for these people. They're called sheep.

Ah, I see, you're that type of troll.