Meanwhile, my father’s Bond of choice was Roger Moore, meaning he, like many Gen Xers who weathered the stark transition from Moore’s campy Bond to Dalton’s stoic, gritty interpretation of the character, was not a big fan of Timothy Dalton, even going as far as to declare him the worst Bond of all time.
This was very much the feel at the time - Dalton's Bond was overwhelming disliked after Sir Roger.
Although there may be an argument to say this was as result of the scripts, I think it was more to do with Dalton's stilted performances.
I've always argued that to describe Moore's Bond as "campy" or a joke is total nonsense - yeah we got the jokes at the end / one liners, at the humorous double take pigeon, drunk guy not believing his eyes and Sheriff Pepper but it's not like Moore was playing Bond for laughs throughout the narrative of his films, e.g. killing that guy in TSWLM by slapping him off from holding his tie or killing that car off the cliff in FYEO.
Although the failure of Dalton was sealed by the disasterous LTK's tone (although now revisionally lauded by Craig apologists), the real failing of Dalton is evident by comparing his performance in TLD compared to Moore's in FYEO (ironically the most accepted Moore performance by Craig apologists).
The tone of these two films is almost identical - pared down, humour still there but more reserved yet Moore's charisma still shines through way above Dalton's. Particularly notable on his horrible delivery of the "salt corrosion" line.
Ironically maybe if LTK had come first he may have been more accepted as the story was much more removed from the classic Bond formula which everyone had already been underwhelmed by his performance in but then again LTK was shot cheaply like a bad extended Miami Vice episode so it's hard to say...
reply
share