Francis Ford Coppola Calls Martin Scorsese the ‘World’s Greatest Living Filmmaker’
share
Im not biggest Stanley Kubrick fan. I would put him over Scorsese. At least the guy dip into ever single movie genre there was. Scoresees stays his safe zone movies about mobsters and assholes. Hell i think Hitchcock was better.
shareThere are no mobsters in Shutter Island, The King of Comedy, Hugo, Silence, Bringing Out the Dead, The Wolf of Wall Street, The Aviator, The Age of Innocence, Kundun, After Hours, The Last Temptation of Christ, The Color of Money, Boxcar Bertha, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, Who's That Knocking at My Door, New York, New York. These are some examples of Scorsese movies that are not a mobster movie, as you can clearly see, he's a great and very versatile living filmmaker.
shareUnlike Spielberg, who did every genre, Scorsese never did Sci-Fi and horror.
shareSpielberg never did an organized crime movie. Scorsese is an expert in organized crime movies and Spielberg is an expert in science fiction movies. Both guys are very versatile filmmakers and both are equally the world's greatest living directors.
share"Organized crime" isn't a genre, "crime" is a genre, which Spielberg did some.
shareWhat's your point? Are you trying to say Spielberg is a superior filmmaker and he is the world's greatest living director?
shareNo, I don't think Spielberg is better or is the best, I just agree "Scoresees stays his safe zone movies about mobsters and assholes." Which is true, unlike Spielberg or Kubrick.
shareScorsese made plenty of movies that are not "safe zone movies about mobsters...". There are no mobsters in Shutter Island, The King of Comedy, Hugo, Silence, Bringing Out the Dead, The Wolf of Wall Street, The Aviator, The Age of Innocence, Kundun, After Hours, The Last Temptation of Christ, The Color of Money, Boxcar Bertha, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, Who's That Knocking at My Door, New York, New York. These are some examples of Scorsese movies that are not a mobster movie, as you can clearly see, he's a great and very versatile living filmmaker.
shareSome of the movies were about assholes: The King of Comedy, The Aviator, The Last Temptation of Christ. My point is: they might be not about mobsters and assholes, but their genres are mostly the same: drama or biopic.
share
'World's greatest living filmmaker' was the claim.
You've picked two filmmakers who may or may not be better than Scorsese. But they're both definitely dead.
Did you even read the title? Kubrick and Hitchcock are dead.
share"living"
shareHe's one of the few filmmakers who hasn't lost his steam at old age. Spielberg lost it, Coppola lost it, Ridley Scott lost it, Tarantino is in the middle of losing it, the Coen brothers lost it.
Personally, I think Leone and Kubrick were the best filmmakers. They've only created classics and not a single boring turd (with the exception of "2001 A Space Odyssey"...which is extremely overrated).
How dare you list the directors who lost their steam without mentioning James Cameron, and George Lucas.
shareLeone's finest work was the Dollars trilogy. His movies after that became increasingly boring. Once Upon a Time in America is possibly the biggest waste of time ever put on film.
shareHe's just being kind. Coppola himself is a better filmmaker than Scorsese. The Godfather Part II alone is better than every Scorsese gangster film put together.
John Milius and Brian De Palma are better than Scorsese, as are Spielberg, Clint Eastwood and 1970s George Lucas, at least in terms of their influence on film making.
Scorsese films are all style and bravado over substance. They have little emotion, just films about cold people in cold environments. Raging Bull is the most dreary piece of shit I've ever seen about the biggest asshole main character ever put to film. His films are watchable and entertaining and skillfully crafted, yes, but they've got no heart or warmth.