MovieChat Forums > Michelle Pfeiffer Discussion > Michelle Pfeiffer vs Sharon Stone?

Michelle Pfeiffer vs Sharon Stone?


who was the better actress?

reply

sharon stones. she is underrate actress.

reply

Sharon Flintstones?

reply

yes!

do you know she was suppose to be in flintstones movie but halle berry take her place?

that flintstones film was not good it cannot be save even if sharon get butt naked in it like all her other terrible 90s film hahahahah

reply

Damn, I never saw the '94 Flintstones movie. I'll have to check it out.

reply

It's not as bad as everyone says, IMHO. It even has an actual plot (which is more than can be said of many big movies). The prequel however is atrocious.

And Halle is very easy-on-the-eyes, and arguably at the peak of her hotness.

reply

i do not recommence flintstones onan unless you like bad film that can be appreciate for ironic reason like when red letter media peoples select terrible film to watch from library and then watch film and laugh.

reply

Actually, Halle Berry would have made a good Betty. Betty was supposed to be hot. Rosie O'Donnell? That's bad casting right there.

reply

yes rosie o'donnel in movies scream "shit 90s films". every movie i see her in is terrible hahahah. at least wilma play by hottie elizabeth parkins.

reply

There was a rumor that Wilma was gonna be played by Vanna White. Lol.

reply

i am not american so i do not know who she is but i am big fan of al bundy and i remember she was in episode as al's dream wife. is she tv actress?

reply

Oh, Vanna White was the hostess on a popular game show. She turned letters for contestants. Lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH9EN8yiDwA

reply

hahah i see. yes i beleive she would make good wilma too (at time when when she was in al bundy)

reply

When she was younger, yes. I'm not sure how well she can act though.

reply

probably not act very well if she stay hostess most of career.

reply

Were you able to watch the film? Did you like it?

reply

Nah, haven't seen it yet.

reply

Yeah, it's one of those movies you just catch while flipping through channels.

reply

Good point.

reply

Pfeiffer. I always thought, that Stone is terrible actress. Both were hot back in the day though.

reply

Stone was good in Casino, and she fulfilled her brief in Total Recall and Basic Instinct.

reply

have you seen sharon in 'year of the gun'? good film.

reply

Michelle pushed herself more.

reply

Exactly. Without a doubt Michelle is the better actor between the two.

reply

Michelle by a mile.

reply

Pfeiffer has had the better projects overall, so, on that basis, I have to say Pfeiffer, seeing as Stone has had less opportunity to show us what her range is.

Apart from Casino, and her fun turns in the more schlocky Total Recall and Basic Instinct, and a few more minor parts in smaller films, Stone hasn't really appeared in many truly memorable films, whereas Pfeiffer has The Fabulous Baker Boys, Batman Returns, The Age of Innocence, Dangerous Liaisons, Scarface, The Witches of Eastwick, Married to the Mob, the underrated Wolf (which Stone was initially supposed to do), Hairspray, Stardust and What Lies Beneath, to her name. I also enjoy Mother!, Grease 2, and Frankie and Johnny, but I appreciate they're less universally popular. And whilst Stone is almost exclusively at her best playing the vicious femme fatale/villain role, Pfeiffer has excelled playing both sympathetic and unsympathetic characters.

reply

Interestingly, Michelle rejected the roles that went to Sharon for Basic Instinct and Casino.

reply

Michelle Pfeiffer

reply