Many are seeming to take the view that she was just some awful addict who made terrible life choices that put herself and others at risk. Thus, "she did it to herself" and "the world is better off without her," yada-yada. Apparently, they've already decided that mental illness was in no way at play in the situation (either that or they haven't even factored in the possibility or just don't care).
Which, even if she was just an addict who made terrible choices, and that's the end of the story, I as well believe that it's kind of unnecessarily shitty and self-serving to hop on this opportunity to give a public hot take (excuse the pun) about how "she gets no sympathy from me" or "that's what you get for drunk driving" etc. As if the loss of life, in general, isn't sad. I recall similar behavior from people after Rush Limbaugh died (they even made "Good Riddance" trend on Twitter). Personally, I was about as far from a fan of that guy as it gets, but even with him I thought that was some scummy behavior. As usual, these people thought they were the ones with the moral high ground while they were acting like this.
But that's just how people are. They love any excuse to give a contrary or antagonistic opinion about a trending topic, regardless of the timing or situation. And they love picking sides. They're probably rationalizing it as bringing awareness to the dangers of drug abuse or something (I'm sure all the druggies lives will be changed after reading their posts). Personally, I think it's more likely that they just like the attention. Or, I suppose, in the best-case scenario, they're too blinded by their empathy for her potential victims to bother humanizing her and her situation, as well.
reply
share