she's getting crap ...

It is a photo of a naked emaciated kid stuffed in a plastic storage tub.

https://nypost.com/2023/01/19/jamie-lee-curtis-slammed-for-photo-of-naked-child/

What kind of weirdo would have something like that hanging in their dining room?

Funny that all the moviechat liberals are silent.

It's an ugly photo. But it definitely qualifies as art. It's definitely not pornographic. It's more yuck.

But again, it's art. And taste is subjective.

What idiots are giving Curtis flack over her taste in art?

It's an unusual photo, but it is legitimate art. I kind of like it.

That's NOT art. I'm willing to believe that it's a picture a mother took of her daughter playing in the yard. However, I don't understand what mother would give such an intimate (and explicit) picture to someone who isn't a close family member or why that someone would hang it in their office, especially since it's an ugly-looking picture.

EDIT: it appears it was NOT simply a picture a mother took of her playing child. It's a whole series of her young daughter, mostly in a state of undress. And it's not as innocent as Curtis makes it out to be:

"Ms Schneider accepts that in some of the photographs her daughter is posing in a fashion which might be considered pornographic if the image were viewed in isolation; but she does not consider that the work, seen as a whole, could be interpreted as obscene."

That is definitely wtf. But how do we know if Jamie chose the art? The picture is outrageous, but who should we be outraged with?

I think the child's facial expression has a lot to do with why people are reacting the way they are. She looks very serious and isn't laughing or smiling like a child having fun normally would be. But perhaps her mother told her to make a serious face thinking it would look more artsy.

Anyway, I don't think Jamie is a pedophile and I don't think she's into child sacrifice, devil worship, and human trafficking like people try to make her out to be. People have been saying a lot of ridiculous stuff about her because of a picture on a wall. It isn't like it's some random child she'd never seen nor met. She was given the photo as a gift by the mother so I expect it is a child she knew and had a personal bond with. And to most of us it may look creepy, but perhaps to her it represents something else like the innocence, freedom, and carefree nature of childhood.