Rate my rating systems please

I think rating system B is better because it’s clearer and more detailed.

For your sub question:

6/10 is watchable, usually just decent or fine.
7/10 is pretty good and worth watching and recommending.

I like B.

You could simplify and do:

Would never watch again. (WNWA)
Might watch again. (MWA)
Will watch again. (WWA)

I'm a big fan of Ws.

I prefer A to B just for the simplicity, but I'd remove either Average or Mediocre - since they mean the same thing to me - and put Good at 6. I also would likely replace Decent with Above Average or Almost Good because decent and good are interchangeable words to me as well.

for a curious side....

where does a BAD movie that you love fit? Crap like STARCRASH, when, truthfully the film is junk, but it is fun to take it in? So bad its good, sort of thing. What kind of number rating can that get?

You've shared one of these rating systems before, it may have been the second one. In any event they are similar and I think either is a fair and good system.

Firstly, I try to avoid presenting my opinion as objective fact, so mine goes something like:

10: Near-flawless, often groundbreaking in some way, imo
9: Absolutely loved it, just not quite 10-worthy
8: Loved it
7: Liked it a lot
6: Liked it
5: Ambivalent about it
4: Meh. Lacking in some way
3: Oof. Did not like, but not completely unwatchable
2: Awful, but had one or two things I didn't hate
1: Fuck outta here with that

[edit] OT: I lean more towards your first.

1 to 10 is sufficient.
No point putting .5s in

Both systems are far superior to the "out of 4" system that i could barely believe my eyes when i found out some critics were using.

[deleted]