How did I know it was MovieMan who made another political topic?

I understand

Realness is always appreciated.

Fortunately or unfortunately, I never encountered him there.

Destroyed? Hyperbole much? He should have just made an affirmative statement of innocence and then left. Essentially, "I don't need this shit". What about Merrick Garland? Was his life destroyed because a bunch of ass-jack pubs scuttled the idea that a sitting two-term President shouldn't have an unexpected SCOTUS nomination? It's all such BS.
The fact that he's so adamant that he DESERVES to be on the SCOTUS is proof enough that he isn't humble, thoughtful and reasonable to make decisions that affect all of us. He's a Partisan Hack, and he's been promised TOO MUCH $$ to blow this deal. He said as much -- millions of dollars, Democratic conspiracy, what a load of nonsense.
Hilary was right using the word Deplorable. She just aimed it at the wrong people.

This kind of bickering has gone on for more than a couple years now in the States.

It’s your birthday weekend, you can say whatever you like 🙂

No need to apologize, it wasn't meant to be.

You are so right, Cat. Napster and I were polar opposites, but we were amicable. Every so often I let something slip.....like my joy of what occurred today. Anyhow as I often have stated why argue with someone whose politics are different from yours? Nothing is going to change. It’s just arguing with a keyboard. It’s not healthy for one thing! Post some info if you wish, but don’t get into arguments and ad hominem attacks. But, (I gave snepts this info previously) for the record it was Senator Schumer who first stated a SCOTUS nominee should not be considered so close to an election. ‘Nuff said! Love 💕 & Blessings to all! Dewey says so!😇 😔Damn...I miss him....

That's fair.