Have you been accused of something you didn't do?
I have, and it is so upsetting! I am a carer and the lady I look after has accused me of using her television and mucking up all the channels on her tv.
She hasn't been diagnosed with dementia but she is 88 years old and maybe having memory issues! She emailed my supervisor and expressed her concerns. My supervisor has emailed me and told me to cut it out.So upset and pissed off and dwelling over it!!!
The rest,I dunno.
I know what you want me to think.
This is-
You travel a lot working for a charity,possibly aiding against starvation and possibly in war zones.
Single and childless.
But hey,never trust anything anyone tells you on the internet! Somebody told me that.
Are you for real?
This all came a wee bit out of the blue in the middle of a bit about bananarama.
Very out of character for you revealing personal info,I don't know what to make of it.
You do realise that "you can try hard...don't mean a thing" is a lyric from It ain't what you do (it's the way that you do it)?
Just trying to work out why you went all Hannibal Lecters on me?
I think we've all had that experience, and yes it is frustrating. Sorry to hear about what happened to you. I think your supervisor should have given you the benefit of the doubt.
Sorry about your situation. Did your supervisor even ask about what happened before he/she told you to cut it out?
Personally, I'd tell the supervisor that if the lady isn't happy with you as her caregiver, perhaps she'd like someone else.
Do you work for an agency? Is there another case you can be given?
Obviously, the lady is upset. You and the supervisor ought to be discussing what to do to improve the situation.
I had a close female friend I had worked with for six months, we were joined at the hip. Near the end of that, she started to express bits of emotional instability (she did have some big issues in her life though) and very odd paranoia. She asked me to come by her desk twice in one day to help her once, and to chat once, and then one of our mutual friends said that she was considering telling Human Resources to tell me to stay away from her.
That blew over and turned into nothing, she must have been in a mood.
BUT not too long after that, I had left the job and hadn't seen her in a bit, and I was going to visit my old roommate who still lived in my previous apartment. This close female friend had told me she lived two blocks from that previous apartment of mine, which we both thought was a neat coincidence. So, before I left, I used Google with her last name and the city, and easily found the address two blocks from my previous apartment.
When I left from my visit with my former roommate, I ended up changing my mind and deciding NOT to visit this "close female friend." I just went home.
The next day, I emailed her and said that I had been in the area and thought of stopping by, and also that I had decided against it and gone home. I also asked about her apartment number because the listing didn't feature that info, it only showed the building's street address. It was a very short, very friendly email. Completely harmless. The last time we had spoken, we mentioned maybe doing lunch or something, so we were on good terms.
She didn't reply to the email. Instead, she claimed to my former employer that I was "following" her, and she filed a restraining order against me.
Crazy Romanian chick. That mutual friend of ours (who I mentioned above) told me this girl was trouble, and was nuts, but I just didn't listen.
Here's the interesting part: This Valentine's Day, I am going to court and putting her in her place. The hearing I requested just so happened to get scheduled for the 14th.
I have a feeling my former employer never saw the one email I sent her, but they took her at her word with me "following her" and hired bodyguards for no reason, and racked up a bill of about $70,000.
They are trying to get me to pay that, and once they see the reality behind her story, I have a feeling they are going to sue her for the costs. She lied to them, she exaggerated one little innocent email, and it's easy to prove.
Thanks, I will. It makes me a little nervous because it's so easy to doubt that all this could come from misinterpreting one little email, but at least I have it all documented, and if necessary, there are other ways to prove that I never said anything threatening. I would be happy to give permission to pull my phone records to show I never called, and I'd give permission to pull my email records directly from Yahoo, whatever is needed.
But I have a feeling she's nutty enough that she feels fully justified based solely on her own interpretation of that one email. If our former employer confronts her with it, she'll probably say "Yes that's the one" and they will suddenly realize what kind of person they're dealing with, and ask her how in the world she could describe that email as being "followed."
I also need to stop pursuing crazy women. Nearly all of my girlfriends in my life have been nutty and unstable. I guess I find it exciting.
It might be a good idea to get your phone records and take them to court with you. It lets them know that you took the time to bring documented proof of your own.
She's legally minded enough that I doubt she has claimed that there was any other contact, and wouldn't be willing to perjure herself. I saw hints of a paranoid mindset at the end, so I really believe she just interpreted the email the way she wanted to and her mind exaggerated the content.
It's only 2 weeks away, so please let us know the outcome!
Here ya go: My injunction was granted. Funny thing, I show up this morning, and the "other side" had brought in a Non-Opposition to file, which means they agreed with me.
The Judge thought it was a "dramatic" (her word) turn to see that response. This is literally what it's like: They were trying to threaten potential legal action for this B.S.; I do a complaint for injuntive relief which translates to "they need to be stopped, and I need a court to prevent them from pulling this crap."
A "non-opposition" is supporting my complaint. A non-opposition translates to "He's right, we do need to be stopped. Please stop us." They might as well have filed the injunction against themselves.
The Judge seemed to wonder why they would just surrender like this, and I smiled when she said "I'm not even going to ask why. I don't care why."
It took like five minutes. What I suspect is that they reviewed my complaint, saw my evidence that this was all due to one innocent email which was exaggerated by this crazy girl, they would have then investigated to come up with any evidence to the contrary to prove that I was stalking her or something.... And at that point, the only real result is that they'd discover I am telling the truth and that they were duped by this girl's paranoia. She would have no choice but to admit that yes, she received one email which was nothing more than "I was thinking of dropping by but decided against it and went home," and turned that into "being followed."
I'd seen enough warning signs during my time when she and I were close, but she's just nutty. The real problem here was that the law firm took her at her word and blew thousands of dollars on personal security without even trying to verify anything she was saying.
Anyway, it's done. My legal move did exactly what it was supposed to do. There really wasn't any other feasible result.
And a very Happy Valentine's Day to you too! You have had the best, now that this little episode is cleared up.
Isn't it strange the way the law works? Confusing at times.
What is sad, is that her lawyers should have been really working for her instead of even letting it get so far... like court! As you said, "The real problem here was that the law firm took her at her word and blew thousands of dollars on personal security without even trying to verify anything she was saying."
She doesn't need lawyers. she needs a doctor's care.
I'm so glad this is behind you now. Have a wonderful night!
She doesn't need lawyers. she needs a doctor's care.
I could really get into that, and issues in her life that would make you nod your head, but I'm not going to. Maybe it's the wine talking, but I do wish her the best and hope they aren't going to go after her for that money.
reply share
Sounds compelling, our narrator tells the story of being falsely accused by some "crazy wench" colleague/female "friend", it get's crazier and crazier as things escalate despite our protagonist's efforts at remedying the "missunderstanding"... The only thing is our narrator is unreliable and is possibly delusional as well! Is he actually a stalker?!
It's funny you ask, because just last night I watched this trailer for Unsane, which is Soderberg's new movie, and your description is kind of similar to it.
(But one thing about trailers like this is that they tend to make the opening build-up of the movie very boring, since we've already seen where it's going)
I actually wondered too if someone would comment that I must have done something more that I'm leaving out, because it does sound ridiculous.
The thing is, if I had done anything to provoke this, I doubt I would be sharing the story. I'd probably keep it locked away out of shame or something.
In the first place, it was weird because I lived in another community and I was caught up in a job that was very demanding, so where would I find the time ?
I was forced to respond to a bogus restraining order. I arrived in court well prepared with plenty of documentation ( something judges absolutely love ). My accuser ultimately looked like a complete fool and the case was dismissed due to zero evidence.
I should have done that at the time, but I didn't bother going to that hearing because none of it mattered to me. A friend of mine recently told me that it sounded like she was trying to pull some kind of scam, but I doubt that and he didn't have any idea how it would be profitable in the first place.
Oh yeah, and also, the restraining order by itself wasn't such a big deal to me, but that's because I wasn't fully aware of her narrative and I had no clue it would lead to hiring of bodyguards.
I would have never imagined it could go that far, and rightly so, because I knew I hadn't said or done anything remotely threatening, nor anything that could reasonably be interpreted as threatening.
Me too. Unfortunately, if those few people don't fess up and admit that they caused the trouble, what else is the one in charge to do? This sort of thing happens in many situations.... not just school.