conservatives holding "choose adoption" sign asked
How many kids they have adopted. anyone want to guess how many they adopted?
https://fb.watch/d6Gq1Dwx_-/
How many kids they have adopted. anyone want to guess how many they adopted?
https://fb.watch/d6Gq1Dwx_-/
What's the point of this video?
shareconservative hypocrisy
shareBut where's the hypocrisy?
sharego beg for attention elsewhere clown
shareFirst, there is no context to this clip. I assume they are against abortion. Second, if it is Infact at an anti-abortion rally, it's not hypocrisy. You would need to prove that the women on the clip have had an abortion in order for it to be hypocrisy.
shareare you illiterate? go beg elsewhere clown
shareHow many human trafficking victims have you taken in and sheltered? None? Well you cannot speak out against the evils of human trafficking unless you yourself have supported the victims. This is what your flawed logic comes down to.
shareThe only sign they were holding up was "choose adoption". I don't see how literacy comes into play. I am asking for the context of the video. Where were they? Was this at a some pro-choice rally? Did they just start this rally to support adoption? What are the details?
sharewhy are you begging like a dog? go beg elsewhere
shareOkay, so you have nothing then. There was no point to your video.
sharedogs not getting it
shareI think it is possible that Beavis & Butthead Trump (aka Donnie Jr. & Eric) may have been adopted.
shareYou said I was illiterate and the only two words there were "choose adoption". Obviously I know what their motives are, but there is no other context in the video. Just because someone says to choose adoption, that doesn't mean they have to do it themselves if they have kids of their own.
shareThe hypocrisy is that they're clearly wearing outfits of mixed cloth!
sharejust because they haven't adopted, doesn't mean that their message is wrong.
There is a huge waiting list for couples looking to adopt new born babies.
The more who chose to give their baby a chance with a loving couple, rather than having it butchered in their womb, the more there will be life, and hapinesss
There's another moral issue here: THOU SHALT NOT KILL!
Choose life.
"There is a huge waiting list for couples looking to adopt new born babies.
"
yetttt not one of these people.
"The more who chose to give their baby a chance with a loving couple, rather than having it butchered in their womb, the more there will be life, and hapinesss"
not how reality works.
"There's another moral issue here: THOU SHALT NOT KILL!"
LOOOLLL aww "sky daddy told me so". the bible is pro abortion. look it up. also pro slavery and wife beating
how many have you adopted?
The Bible is NOT pro-abortion.
And while there WAS slavery in the OLD Testament, in the New Testament the teachings of Christ led to the abolition movement!
Yes, in Great Britain and the USA, the abolitionists were church going folk who said that this institution was unjust and had to go!
The Bible is NOT pro 'wife beating'; where do you come up with this shit?
And while I haven't adopted children, its because I'm not married! Children deserve a MOTHER AND A FATHER!
yes it is. if your wife cheats on you you give Her a concoction and if she cheated the baby gets aborted.
"And while there WAS slavery in the OLD Testament, in the New Testament the teachings of Christ led to the abolition movement! "
LOL the new testament literally tells you to obey your masters. while some abolitionists used the New Testament, the very same pro slavery people also used the New Testament to justify it. The bible is undoubtably, unequivocally pro slavery. Even telling you how to own and treat them and the different rules of a Hebrew vs a foreign slave/
"Yes, in Great Britain and the USA, the abolitionists were church going folk who said that this institution was unjust and had to go! "
yes at a time 100% of people were christian. what else would they use? the Qaran?
"And while I haven't adopted children, its because I'm not married! Children deserve a MOTHER AND A FATHER!"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHof course you haven't. as I thought. Yes lady its better a kid stays in the foster system/ adoption system rather than have only a father or mother. thats what you tell yourself to make excuses.
another immoral person making excuses
"yes it is. if your wife cheats on you you give Her a concoction and if she cheated the baby gets aborted."
lol. wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVdVIbmkgM8
BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA you found YouTube's biggest apologist laughing stock. one of the worst apologists online who is basically a meme at this point of embarrassing Christians. good job!
"because the womb shrivelling is a more accurate rendering of the original Hebrew"
and what does the womb shrivelling mean? oh right, she had an abortion
"they also think it describes barrenness, not miscarriage! its a curse of bareness, not miscarriage"
"even if it is an abortion it's not about her right to choose, its about gods right to judge!"
ohh wow! You sure showed me!! so instead they think sterilizing the person is better. how moral and Christian of you. and abortions great if god judges it. "its not murder if god does it!".this is your brain on religion,. the mental gymnastics and pretzels you have to do to justify your nonsense is hilarious
Also you ignored the slavery parts! good job! and I didnt even mention the pro sex slavery part. where you take the canonites virgin girls. I wonder what the point was??
its almost like ti was written by people and their morals at the time acting like god was allowing their horrible behaviour.
According to Tikva Frymer-Kensky, the ritual is not actually an "ordeal" which provides a verdict on the woman's guilt for use by human judges, but rather takes the form of a "purgatory oath, in which the individual swearing the oath puts himself under divine jurisdiction, expecting to be punished by God if the oath-taker is guilty'.
That's all.
Not an abortion at all.
Nice try tho!
wowww you have one person! meanwhile other biblical scholars disagree!
and actually this is what she says
""The most probable explanation for the phrase [’and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away’] . . . is that the woman suffers a collapse of the sexual organs known as a prolapsed uterus. In this condition, which may occur after multiple pregnancies, the pelvis floor (weakened by the pregnancies) collapses, and the uterus literally falls down. It may lodge in the vagina, or it may actually fall out of the body through the vagina. If it does so, it becomes edematous and swells up like a balloon. Conception becomes impossible, and the woman’s procreative life has effectively ended . . ." [Note: Tikva Frymer-Kensky, "
so again you have one scholar. who says it basically destroys the woman's insides lol. so moral. so Christian. wait isnt the point to bring life into the world? im confused
nice try though! you totally dodged your pro slavery bible, pro sex slave disgusting texts. they've taught you well to be a religious person
fertility is a blessing from God; You think God is going to reward an adultress with more kids? Oh hell to the no!
share"fertility is a blessing from God"
LOOOLLLLL citation needed. damn your brain is just one big barely functioning mess. a hateful costard and religious. damn you lost out on the genetic/social lottery
Go read the Bible and stop basing your opinions on atheist memes. Its sad how stupid you are.
share"ohh wow! You sure showed me!! so instead they think sterilizing the person is better. "
You are moving the goalposts now. The comment I replied to was that you thought there was some kind of prooftext in the OT that says it supports abortion. The onus is not on me to debunk whatever other issues you have with the Bible. Something tells me, ( namely your behaviour and lack of humility) that it isn´t worth my precious time to try to.
No I adressed your video.
which again in his biblical version is different than another. again more nonsense in the bible. amazing how the innerant word of god can be so full of\.. errors..
This is a logical fallacy.
They are telling others what to do and how to live. while not helping in any ways themselves, and being part of a party that actively tries to defund any sort of social services that would help with adoption.
shareThere you go. Finally an explanation.
Their argument is that instead of aborting your child, choose putting it up for adoption. So why should the people in the video adopt if they have children of their own and decided to keep them?
Because as always LeoDERcaprio is too stupid to realise it.
shareno one is talking to you doggy. go beg elsewhere. your life must be so pathetic
shareLiterally, a logical fallacy.
shareI like the one who kept repeating "No we couldn't adopt" at the end. It sounded like they tried, but were rejected.
I wonder what child welfare services found in their home that they 'couldn't adopt' ? Maybe Matt Gaetz is their son ?
prob a criminal record. but now a born again christian who thinks they are better than everyone
shareThat's what I'm thinking, as well. There is definitely something 'not kosher' in her past or her husband's past the way she answered so curtly.
shareyeppppp 100% her or a sketchy husband with questionable charges.
of course now she's a born again lecturing others about abortions. Its pretty common. the worst people telling others how to live while being hypocrites
"I wonder what child welfare services found in their home that they 'couldn't adopt' ? Maybe Matt Gaetz is their son ? "
Does your brain really work like this?
holier than though family values conservative politicians do seem to have a problem with not living by their preaching and going after young girls or trying to get their mistresses to have abortions
rules for thee not for me
The US definitely needs adoption reform. I'm a single man. Even if I wanted to adopt a child, I wouldn't be allowed to.
Yet, if I was gay with another man...I would be allowed to adopt and groom the child with no issue!
Since the 1960s, single men and single women have been allowed to adopt a domestic child in all fifty states in America.
I have a very good reason to believe that it's just your personal record and background info which disqualifies you from adopting a child. Laws are in place to prevent people such as you from adopting, thankfully.
https://adoption.org/can-adopt-single-parent#:~:text=Thanks%20to%20changes%20in%20the,adoptive%20parent%20to%20a%20child.
Okay, so it seems my only real barrier would be the insane amount of fees necessary to do so, to which I would rather use that money on the actual child. What a crock.
Great information, but...
Laws are in place to prevent people such as you from adopting, thankfully.
how many immigrants have liberals invited into their homes?
Oprah has 6 homes and Nancy Pelosi owns about $20 million worth of real estate spread throughout nine properties.
why dont they let immigrants stay in their excess houses?
How do you know what Oprah and Pelosi have done as far as letting 'immigrants' into their homes ?
shareLiberals and wealthy republican let in the illegal immigrants to be servants and grounds keepers of their homes. So yes, the illegal immigrants are inside liberals' homes and wealthy republicans' homes.
shareSo just kill them...solid point...
share