MovieChat Forums > Fallout4 > Replies
Fallout4's Replies
Looks more like Booker T to me.
So this means a sequel is confirmed?
Brings back memories.
Another issue with this film was the "Part 1". That is a turn off to casual audiences.
Then there's the trailer. It wasn't good. When I first saw it, I was not sold on the film. I understand you don't want to give anything away but I went into this movie blind, knowing absolutely nothing about the plot because the trailer revealed nothing. I think had they marketed the film around the weaponization of a sentient AI, it would have turned more heads. But that trailer was too uneventful and made me feel the movie would turn out the same.
And the movie lacked star power. Fallout had Henry Cavill, Alec Baldwin and Angela Bassett. DRP1 had Tom Cruise. That's it.
Yes. I couldn't even make it past four episodes of Last of Us because I felt like it was another retelling of The Boring Dead.
Agreed. It's torture sitting through an episode. The laziest most unimaginative writing I've ever seen in a TV series.
Darabont and Mazarra did a good job but it all went to shit when they promoted Scott M. Simple to showrunner. Guy kiIIed this series and Angela Kang then buried itm
I thought they were both trash.
It was a stupid idea to release the movie a week ahead of a Nolan film to begin with.
If you didn't like one, then you'll hate every other film except for maybe Fallout. The first movie is the second best of the series.
There was probably more to it that was cut from the film. Just a guess.
Fallout and the first MI are the only good movies in the series. Your criticisms can be applied to literally every other MI movie.
I have no idea how Hollywood screws up most of the films that they do. At this point, I'm game for letting AI put those hack writers and directors out of business.
Sounds good to me
Hence why I don't give a damn if those hack writers (or anyone in Hollywood for that matter) starve.
Lmao. The "patriarchy" claims another inferior victim.
Hopefully unemployment
Yeah the cameo was dumber than the movie itself
Cope, snowflake.
No. Perry is that big of a you know what and I legit know people equally as you know what and gullible as he was who you could fool just as easily. I wish I had thought of this idea and used some of the geniuses I know.
Plus no one is that great of an actor. No one. Perry would be an A-lister right now if his acting ability was truly that amazing.
I signed it. But I read the script and can say with confidence test audiences ruined this movie because by reshooting the ending, they had to go back and cut so many other scenes that really would've enhanced the film.
It wasn't just the ending that was taken away but so much else that involved Susan. Like you guys would be shocked at how much was cut. And I know these scenes exist because some were featured in stills and the TV spots. I guess it was deleted to make her more unlikable but instead it made her character more bland and uninteresting.