MovieChat Forums > Goodgirl1980
Goodgirl1980 (23)
Posts
Replies
That because its not a prequel the the 1939 The Wizard if OZ movie... she's not supposed to be the wicked witch from that movie... it's an adaption of the novel "Wicked" and and the Broadway play which is more of a prequel to the original story.
Payton was probably already a psycho just like her husband was... that's probably why they were married ! at least that's what I always assumed!
I mean its also possible she was just in denial that her husband sexually assaulted Claire and those other women , and thought they made it up I suppose and she wanted revenge.
But my guess she was always a nutcase and this situation just brought it out more and pushed her over the edge!
This movie or post has noting do do with politics or left vs right! gosh so sad how people are so obsessed these days , and bring it into movies and pots that have absolutely nothing to do with politics at all.
Marlene had a bad feeling about Payton from the beginning that she was hiding something and when she saw the windchimes looked exactly the same she just decided to investigate to see what she could find.
Claire believes that Solomon molested her daughter Emma because she finds Emma's underwear in his cart- that is the reason she kicks him out. Now, yes I will admit it did seam a bit obvious when Payton has asked her if Salomon had any batteries in his truck... and the underwear just happened to be there! (Payton had planted Emma's underwear in there, as Solomon had caught her in the window breastfeeding Claire's baby, and she knew he could tell on her) but Claire kicking him out had nothing to do with him being autistic or because of his race. Claire even told Payton that she must of misunderstood when she first brings it to her attention and lies saying that she thinks some of Solomon's behavior with Emma is "inappropriate".
Sure she could have asked his side of the story but she freaked out when she saw her daughter's underwear there, like any parent would! and I'm sure she would have reacted the exact same way even if Salomon didn't have any mental issues.
As far as her not apologizing , I think by the ending we know that she will apologize to him... she tells him at the end that she trusts him with the baby, we obviously know that he is gonna reconnect with the family:)
Corrine1 was not Garland's daughter- she was his wife and Malcolm's mother.
Corrine2 was Malcolm and Alicia's daughter (She was conceived out of rape)
Christopher was Garland and Alicia's daughter.
In the movie they found out the were half brother and sister yes, but in the books they did not. They always thought they were half uncle and niece.
That's not true, bullies definitely know what they are doing is wrong.
Remember one of the bully girls even said how they were "Going to hell for this" and the other one relied " We'll be the best looking ones there!" they defiantly knew how cruel they were and they just didn't care.
In regards to the bullies not knowing who was the outcasts were that were torturing them just shows that they either:
A. Were really stupid
B. Just didn't think the "outcasts" that they bullied could ever possibly ever have it in them to do such a thing- as they saw them as harmless wimps. (Which I'm sure a lot of bullies think)
C. Bullied so many kids (Maybe other ones that they never showed?) and just couldn't narrow it down to who it was.
That was still no excuse to become a bully bullies regardless of how they are treated at home... they still knew it was wrong what they were doing. Especially Bradley he was the worse IMO he even admitted he did it because "nobody can stop him" Well the so called "freaks" wanted to make sure he was stopped!
I'm not saying I agree with what they did but I defiantly understand these kids pain. I was bullied in school and I never fully recovered. I really does hurt and effect your life.
This movie was supposed to be a wake up call to bullies.
Which part do they mention the hotel?
There was no Ebay back in 1990!
View all replies >