MovieChat Forums > tar > Replies
tar's Replies
I found it also especially boring as nothing really happens through the first half where I wondered what the movie is about and what the motives of most characters are. Also, with the exception of Graves, the characters were not interesting. Instead we were shown a kind of childish awkwardness which was so odd that I even thought the protagonist is blind as he was not able to look others in the face/eyes while talking with them.
Yes.
I would agree in principle, but in times of manipulated votes, bought followers/views, and bias created by relationships within the media circus and overt political pressure, you always have to take a closer look. Personally, I found TL neither funny nor particularly outstanding - on the contrary, rather infantile/mediocre, even boring and lacking any roars for the comedy genre (it is quite unfunny, tbh). That's my opinion for now, but the discrepancy between the critics' and users' ratings and winning endless awards while not being anything outstanding points to a biased view, if not manipulation. I even asked around here if one who said he loved TL could tell me one particular scene where he bursted out laughing. His response was quite telling: he could not tell me one.
I just wanted to point out that having a majority or being a majority of this or that view is fundamentally not a validating argument.
Fifty billion flies can't be wrong.
Kudos to the truth. It is a mediocre feel good show with infantile plots which is pushed by the members of the Television Academy who are garnished by the producers from Apple which also led to 98 % critical acclaims at Rotten Tomatoes... but do not compare the ratings (especially the difference of the critics and the audience) with Seinfeld or Curb your Enthusiasm or you suddenly get named a troll by "TruMovieFan".
Not quite, I am a Russian bot.
Which scene(s)?
What? We are talking about Ted Lasso and not about a 20 year old movie.
Since when do nominations and Emmys replace lack of humour?
Seriously, can you name at least one scene where you burst out laughing?
As German, I've laughed my ass off at Monty Python, Faulty Towers, Little Britain, The Office (orig.) and other brilliant British comedies. In comparison, Ted Lasso is just pure crap - I did not even laugh once. Culture my ass.
All said: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw6081805/
This show is for the stupid which have become the majority.
Right, that would make sense if Loki the series would not exist or if by killing Kang by Sylvie has effects on Kangs designed timeline, so that suddenly all deviations are possible there. So, its possible. Thanks.
The more I think of it, the more questions arise:
What about time manipulations, in general? Does Dr. Strange create a new timeline/universe by every time manipulation he makes? So, is there a universe where Thor is boozing tea instead of beer? ;) Is there an Earth destroyed for each time Dr. Strange is killed by Dormammu? Holy...
They should have inserted a scene where Robin jumps out from the dark:
- "Dash, Batman! I hung up on this riddle."
- "Yes, Robin - we need to activate the remote bat computer switch! .. As you clearly see, Robin, liars do not lie anymore but are still lying around."
- "Holy riddlerat!"
He couldn't answer most questions immediately: the URL thing, Falcone, the carpet
... and he is still struggling about finding the murder of his parents and what to do with a good looking pussy who spread her legs for him.
It will be just a black screen with *KAPOW* sounds all around.
Would one calculate the opposite if the White woman would choose an Eastasian man? ;)
> A mathematician that would be able to determine the status of all particles in the universe would be able to calculate ALL the events happening in the universe from the big-bang to the end of the universe. It's just about science, cause and event.
This contradicts quantum mechanics (Heisenbergs uncertainty principle et al.).
In general, it is always the absurd adherence to the idea of tangible things that denies the reality of non-tangible and constantly changing relations.
We find this problem not only in physics (at Foundation even in mathematics... which is nothing else than a pure descriptive/understanding support), but very strongly also in monetary theory (the money-thing as a so-called medium of exchange instead of the actual relations of volatile assets arising from intangible, but real set law and thus power relations).
The only really comprehensible aspect here would be the at first seemingly abstruse designation "psychohistory", which in turn brings the aspect of mass sociology into focus through the "psychology of the masses", which has been known for more than a hundred years. However, this has nothing to do with mathematics, at all.
You forgot that Kraaal Fnudschik also manually calculated her ships destination like a 119 year old veteran space navigator via "simple optical navigation" by perfectly identifying quasars and using angular distances between some space objects named in the thousand range as well as at least 5 cones with various different half angles.
Well... here I knew shit gets real when you grow up on a religious water world praying to a sleeping god. Maybe she got kissed by Cthulhu himself.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dOHHNpFPigfB/
To summarize:
1. a covid infection does NOT form NEW antibodies, but is a "recall", i.e. it is not a new virus/virus strain, which also means that vaccination is not necessary to form antibodies.
2. antibody tests are useless, because antibodies are formed (or released by the lymph nodes) only AFTER an actual infection.
3. the vaccine contacts the cell walls of the blood vessels, causing the wall cells of the blood vessels to form so-called spines ("spikes"). The patient's own immune system reacts and attacks the spiky cells with so-called "killer lymphocytes" (which otherwise attack the viruses, which have precisely these "spikes"), i.e. the vessel wall is injured and blood clotting occurs at these sites. Thus, with a (first) vaccination, there is a risk of thrombi (blood clots) up to thrombosis.
4. in the case of a prompt second vaccination (within a few weeks), due to the renewed contact of the vaccines with the cell wall in the blood vessels, the spikes are again formed by the patient's own bloodstream wall cells - this time, however, while the bloodstream is still full of antibodies (which were formed during the initial infection and have not yet been broken down again). The numerous existing antibodies then immediately bind to these spines of the own cell wall, whereby now the so-called "complement system" of the own immune system is triggered, which now massively(!) attacks and destroys the cell wall. Thus, the vaccine from the bloodstream reaches the internal organs behind (heart, liver, lungs, brain, ...), where it again ensures that the organ cells form these spines and are thus also attacked and destroyed by the own immune system (the "killer lymphocytes"). It comes to an AUTOIMMUNREACTION = self-destruction of the body.