MovieChat Forums > KatVenediktova > Replies
KatVenediktova's Replies
I know, it's horrifying.
At least there is an abundance of older media that don't feature this anti-white propadanda that we can show our kids. No film containing an interracial couple grazes my TV screen in the house. The kids watch older movies free of that.
I will not tolerate and stand idly by as anti-white Hollywood weirdos brainwash my kids into thinking that white people having black or Asian kids is "normal" and that they should contribute to the genetic and phenotypic annihilation their race and European physical features.
Hollywood wants a homogenized future Europe and USA where distinct, purely-European looking whites like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jennifer Connelly and Jessica Chastain have vanished and have been replaced by a monolithic Afro-Asian looking population, similar to Tiger Woods. Of course they don't care that outside of white countries the other races will remain in-tact and their appearances must go. They just care about eradication "white" people. Because whites are evil and without us the world will be a better place. According to Hollywood weirdos, white men oppress others through our power and white women oppress others by having prized facial features, hair, hair and eye colours that women of other races can't have. So they want us gone and the best, most insiduous way to do that is to normalize miscegenation to our kids.
No. Goodbye to you and you please never come back. The white race and European beauty cannot survive the relentless cannibalistic onslaught of SJWs like you, who for some reason think that supporting the annihilation of their own people makes them morally superior and enlightened. Shame on you.
Who is paying you for every white women that produces a black, Nigritic, Chadic, Nilotic, Kushtic or Bantu looking child? Soros?
Why, so that you can post your propaganda in support of the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of the white race and European appearances without anyone opposing you?
I don't think so. Why don't you delete YOUR account. The white race surely don't need people like you. You are like a cancer bent on annihilation of the thing you are part of.
You might like the idea of a future where purely-European looking women like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly have been eradicated and everyone in Europe and the USA looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods, but most white people are not self-loathing like you.
If you are non-white, then shame on you for trying to shame white people into embracing their own destruction, just so you can fulfill your revenge fantasy of impregnating a white woman.
I agree completely. He is a good-looking white man with good-looking European facial features. He would want a white woman to give him white kids with European facial features and hair. A good-looking white man like him wouldn't want brown kids with wide flat noses, big lips, prognathous faces, black eyes and kinky Afro hair.
Men care about what their kids will look like more than women do. Women don't care so much about passing down their beauty. They only see their European beauty as a means to an end- to score a rich husband. They don't care if their mixed kids look straight out of Somalia or Ghana as long as they can be on instagram all day and never worry about money.
For white men, passing down European features to their kids is a source of pride.
You don't see anything wrong with the promotion of the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly have gone extinct? Do you want European facial features, hair, facial bone structure, hair and eye colours to be eradicated? Do you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?
Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? Do you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?
By promoting interracial couples in movies, Hollywood is trying to brainwash white children into contributing and committing to the extinction of their own people. That is NOT acceptable.
There is nothing racist about protesting the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white European people and the eradication of European facial features, hair, facial bone structure and skin tone. There is nothing racist about opposing the eradication of purely-European looking women like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly.
Whites have a right to exist, and promoting miscegenation threatens our existence. You might personally desire for whites to be annihilated, but not all whites are as self-loathing or indifferent as you are.
Do you actually WANT whites to go extinct?
There is nothing normal about it. Interracial couples are an aberration. The reason we have wonderful different looking races today is thanks to tens of thousands of years of groups of people mutating in isolation and marrying within those groups to preserve those features. By mixing out now we will eradicate that beautiful diversity and instead have a future where everyone looks the same and Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods. European appearances will be obliterated.
There is nothing normal or okay about the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white European people.
You don't see anything wrong with the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly do not exist and have gone extinct? DO you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?
Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? DO you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?
Also, careful about calling white people "inbreds". By that logic all pure, non-mixed people on the planet are inbred, including BILLIONS of Africans, Asians, Indians and Middle Eastern people.
"There is no SJW agenda"
There most certainly is. Forced racially diverse representation by pressuring white writers and white filmmakers to put racial diversity in their films at any cost, even if it means a racially diverse family. And then there is the greater, Kalergian goal of globalists - the wiping out of distinct European beauty, facial features and hair in favour of the creation of a single, monolithic race of which everyone looks exactly the same and Afro-Asian, like Tiger Woods. They want the USA and Europe to be the melting pot experiment zones where that monolithic race is supposed to be created.
You don't see anything wrong with the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly do not exist and have gone extinct? DO you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?
Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? DO you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?
No, they are not. They will become more common, but they will never be the norm. At some point white people will realize that they are being annihilated through mixing and they will turn against it and stick to their own kind in order to preserve European beauty for the future.
There is a reason interracial couples are nearly non existent in South Africa - whites there are the minority and because of that they have a stronger sense of racial identity and wish to preserve the European facial features and hair that make them look distinct from the native Africans, instead of wiping out those features through mixing. This will happen in the USA too. At some point a beautiful white blonde with straight hair, blue eyes, a long narrow nose and small lips will realize that it's not cool for her to wipe out those features and contribute to their extinction by having black or Asian kids. She will have pride and will decide to have children in her own racial image to preserve it.
That is the future.
Skin colour isn't the only difference. They have different nose shapes, lip sizes, facial bone structure, eye shapes, hair type and texture and hair and eye colour and even body proporitons. Europeans and sub-Saharan Africans look very different beyond just skin tone.
And yes, it is a problem. Interracial couples will result in the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of European looking people. Interracial couples cannot produce a child that looks like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly.
"Interracial couples exist, whether you like it or not."
They do, but that doesn't mean white extinction should be promoted in movies. Keep couples the same race in movies instead of spreading propaganda normalizing white extinction.
Why are you defending interracial couples anyway?
No, they are their own race.
Europeans, sub-Saharan Africans, East Africans, Khoisan, Middle Eastern people, Turkic people, South Asians (Indians, Pakistanis, Afghans), East Asians, Oceanic people, Australian Aboriginal, North American Indians, Mesoamericans and South American Indians are the different races that exist.
"It shouldn't matter. "
Of course it should matter. Interracial relationships will literally result in the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of the white race and European appearances. Given enough free mixing, everyone in the world in the future will look Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods. Whites like we know them today, like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly will disappear.
That is not acceptable and it has to most certainly matter. We have to prevent the extinction of whites. We don't have to make mixed relationships illegal, but we should not encourage them in the media.
"if you portray it more, it becomes more normal and less taboo and hopefully people will start to see it as being normal."
It is not normal and never will be. It is and always will be an aberration. Why do you want it to be normal? Do you want white people and European facial features and hair to go extinct? Do you want women who look like Amy Adamss, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly to not exist in the future? Interracial couples cannot produce white, European-looking children.
"Look at England.. Lots of black/white couples - normal over there."
No, it is still a tiny fraction of all couples and it is most certainly NOT normal. It is an aberration and people will complain about it and condemn it around the dinner table. Don't make the mistake of thinking that most English people are happy about beautiful white women producing black children that have none of their mothers' beautiful European facial features and hair. Britain simply has extreme restrictions on free speech and complaining about interracial couples can get you arrested and sentenced to prison, so people don't complain about it as openly.
Mixed marriage is not fine, at least not the promotion and marketing thereof to children. Children should not be made to feel pressured to date interracially and they should not be brainwashed to turn against and wipe out their own kind. Interracial couples cannot produce white, European-looking children and will therefore result in the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people. That is bad. Very bad.
Missing out on white extinction and being a traitor is a good thing. Also, most white people do not find other races visually appealing so no, they are not missing out. I am proud of my clean record of exclusively dating within my own race.
You like dark skin? What about wide and flat noses, big protruding lips, prognathous facial bone structure and black, kinky pot scrubber type hair? Because those features tend to go together.
Also, do you wish to have children that don't resemble you and your race at all and looks like the parent of the other race?
Essentially, do you wish to directly contribute to the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of the white race and European beauty? Do you want women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly to vanish from this earth?
"Actually, it has happened before several times. Rome in the 2nd/3rd century was very similar to modern US. "
This is absolute nonsense. Rome was nothing like the US today in terms of racial diversity. Rome was white. There may have been some Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Semitic people who made it to Rome and lived there. Black sub-Saharan Africans would have been very rare and would have been slaves.
Why not? Because it will brainwash white children to contribute to the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of their race and European facial features and hair. Interracial couples cannot produce white, European looking children. Look at the kids of the couple in the film - they look nothing like their European father.
Unlike you, I do not wish for whites and European beauty to be wiped out.
It sadly brainwashes young white children in real life, so it is a concern. It is brainwashing white children into committing the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of their own white race and the physical features and appearances that make white European people look distinct from the other races.
It's basically telling white kids that it is "normal" and "cool" to wipe out their own race.