MovieChat Forums > Corneileous > Replies
Corneileous's Replies
They did that for awhile but it’s been almost like 5 years between the current release and the last one, Bumblebee but so what. They’re making bank on this that you call “infantile shit” so chill out. You obviously don’t like it so why do you think we all that like it need to be molestered with your belligerent opinion?
Yeah, Id say it's pretty safe to say those that said the Rock was done with the Fast and Furious franchise were full shit, man.
Oh hell, the stewardess on the plane that Jakob and little Dom were on.... didn't even realize that.
You know, its funny you said that because a couple years ago I watched a You tube video where some dude claimed to have seen the script that said that basically if Paul Walker hadn't of died, one of the movies, maybe even the finale was supposed to have all of the villains like Johnny Tran, Cipher, even Carter Verrone come back and plot together to get Dom and his crew.
Well, even though I was sure Han was in that car when it blew up but I think it's pretty clear Jesse wont be returning.
Reaper... Yeah, that was dumb but then again ya gotta remember, Tokyo Drift was only the third movie in the building franchise. The franchise didn't really officially begin until the fourth movie came out when all the crew was back so who's to say at that point, it probably was never ever intended to be revealed who the real Han was and I'm not talking about only what we find out at the end of TD when Dom makes a cameo appearance ands tells Sean he used to roll with Han back in the day. I really think that at that point, that was all to be explained.
But see, I heard opposite that Brian wasn't going to return but then again, what I read about where Dante supposedly came from wasn't accurate, either and neither was some people's prediction about Tess, played by Brie Larson.
My thoughts though, I hope they leave Brian out of it but then again, you're right, Brian isnt dead, only the actor who played him.
Thats kinda what I wondered too... His son was a little on the dark side, wasn't he?
If it’s bad people killing bad people and bad people who mess with the wrong good people, why not? Besides that, when legal gun carriers kill in self defense, that’s not murder just the same as somebody who’s shooting at police gets put down by the police, that’s not murder either.
But just out of curiosity, why does it sound as though you don’t think bad people should get what they have coming to them?
I agree, and neither should self-defense killings as well. While we’re at it, the people who shoot and cops and then get shot dead because of it, shouldn’t count either.
Once again the communication process has been broken down as your response to what I said makes entirely no sense at all and doesn’t even pertain to it in the least little bit. There will always be bad guys. There will always be good guys and it’s not gun violence, it’s bad guys doing what bad guys do. And it’s not brought to us by the GOP or the NRA. They are preserving OUR rights which doesn’t go hand in hand with this ridiculous “gun” violence term that idiots like you keep parroting like a bunch of morons. It’s time for you to to wake up.
<I><b>Again….</b></I>
Sure they do and so do I. So do many, many, many other people, you just fail to see it because either you’re too stupid or you’re too naïve to understand what the real problem is, what truly needs to be done to combat against it and most importantly, you fail to realize there’s gonna be evil people who will do evil things in this world no matter what laws, restrictions or regulations you help push for to prevent it. You don’t stop bad guys by going through the good guys. The sooner people like you understand that, the better this world will be.
Sure they do and so do I. So do many, many, many other people, you just fail to see it because either you’re too stupid or you’re too naïve to understand what the real problem is, what truly needs to be done to combat against it and most importantly, you fail to realize there’s gonna be evil people who will do evil things in this world no matter what laws, restrictions or regulations you help push for to prevent it. You don’t stop bad guys by going through the good guys. The sooner people like you understand that, the better this world will be.
So yet another senseless tragedy and this is the best you can muster up to talk about it by picking on “gun nut Republicans” and actually picking on the thoughts and prayers to the families which is not only by just Republicans.
Once again, you never cease to amaze me. Seems to me at this point that you don’t even care, you just wanna use these news stories to push your bullshit agenda. That’s pretty pathetic.
<blockquote> 2 1/2x more likely to die by a gun in Oklahoma than California!
You're the one who submitted the data!!!! You are clueless in understanding it because your math sux, dude!</blockquote>
No, I dont think so. My state respects gun rights and lets it’s residents carry without a rights-infringing permit which means any legally-recognized resident- well, actually anybody for that matter in the United States including Hawaii and Alaska can carry here also without permit so, there’s a lot more people here who can freely defend themselves with the very tool you're trying to restrict!
And what data are you talking about? Yes, I know I gave the data yet you refuse to read it and take it for what it is. I asked you, how many of those 3,737 people killed in California and Oklahoma who were victims and how many were killed by the person the attacker was trying to victimize? Why cant you answer that? Why do you continually step over that?
But I still wanna see how you say my math sucks because there’s still a lot more people killed in California than there are here and because we have more good people armed here, I guarantee you most of those 737 are the piece of shit people who’s trying to hurt people.
<blockquote> I'm going to assume your state's educational system is crappy, too!</blockquote>
Well, you know what they say about that word <I>assume…</I> Makes an ass outta you and me. Well, mostly you.
<blockquote>"Rioters Storm Tennessee Capitol Demanding Gun Control" Topic is literally Tennessee!</blockquote>
Yeah, so?
<blockquote>So stop giving them guns!</blockquote>
Nobody’s <i>giving</I> them shit, dude! Why would you say something stupid like that?? And yes, that is a serious question! They either steal it or buy it off the street illegally or if they dont have a record, they buy them legally but no one’s giving them the damn gun.
<blockquote><b><i>I said;</i> "I can’t control what the schools do."</b>
So stop giving them (mentally unstable and evil people) guns!</blockquote>
How does saying what you said answer what I said??
Again, no one is giving these deranged assholes anything. My solution- when I said I cant control what schools do, was get rid of the gun free zone signs at let the staff be armed but guess thats unfathomable for your feeble little mind.
<blockquote>That's all? Jan. 6 caused much more damage.</blockquote>
You sure about that?? First off, I was only making a simple guesstimation moron but if you really wanna get technical, the George Floyd riots and “peaceful” protests cost over $2 billion.
https://fee.org/articles/george-floyd-riots-caused-record-setting-2-billion-in-damage-new-report-says-here-s-why-the-true-cost-is-even-higher/amp
The Jan 6th “insurrection” only cost $1.5 million according to the District of Columbia Attorney’s Office.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/one-year-jan-6-attack-capitol
What are you even talking about?
Old news… Lol? Who the fuck cares if it’s old news, it still fucking happened. There were still people who died and were injured and there was a lot of property that was fucked up because a lot of those “peaceful” protests.
And it most certainly was not 99% peaceful. I wouldn’t call the tens of thousands of dollars of damage they caused as 99% peaceful.
And I really don’t give a shit what Tennessee’s homicide rate is so you might as well quit throwing that shit at me because it really doesn’t mean all that you hope it means. We have a lot of mentally unstable and evil people in this country so saying who has the worst or the least doesn’t mean shit.
And why the accusation about not keeping my kids safe? When they’re at home or when they’re with me, they’re safe but hey, I can’t control what the schools do. People like you and with your thought process are the reason why the good people aren’t allowed to be harmed at schools.
And yeah, some of that so-called insurrection bullshit that people like you like to call it, that was riding, so what’s your point on bringing that up? Which I might add as well, is old news.
I don’t? So then what was all that in the aftermath of George Floyd?
So, just because you’re looking at population comparison, you think that just because my state only had 737 “gun” deaths in, I don’t know what time frame you’re referring to but you say that is more than the 3000 people in California that were killed? Again, in what time frame? I don’t understand your logic and I certainly don’t understand how you can say it’s safer in California than it is here… Lol. That’s just absolutely absurd.
Not to mention the fact that almost every gang known to man is in LA, San Francisco, and probably even in San Diego as well. Not to mention Sacramento but yet because you look at population comparison, you foolishly think California is a safer state than Oklahoma… Lol. I swear man, you need some help because I think you got a few wires crossed in your head.
But see, and I think I’ve asked you this before but which of those 3000 killed in California was a “gun” death from self-defense and how many of those 737 in Oklahoma was a “gun” death as a result of self-defense? I guarantee you there was a lot more criminals and outlaws getting shot here than there were in California.
But see, this is just like Covid. If a person died of something else but had Covid at the same time, they listed it as a result of Covid even if Covid didn’t really have that much to do with it. This is the same thing. Whether somebody died as a victim from someone with a gun, it’s still going to get counted the same way as somebody who died from somebody with a gun who was defending themselves. This is why you can take your so-called data and stick it where the sun don’t shine.
What do you mean, what kind of logic is that? Law-abiding people follow the law. That’s why they’re called law-abiding in the first place. It’s pretty straightforward. And yes I know criminals don’t follow the law because that’s why they call them criminals or outlaws… Lol. What is the silly point you’re trying to make by saying that?