MovieChat Forums > MeYouFools > Replies
MeYouFools's Replies
I will fight you in the street for calling Nora a liar...
I never claimed not to be.
And my opinion is none of your damn business.
Thank you for that useless report. And stop using "woke" as a buzzword to describe anything you don't like.
I, meanwhile, saw it.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ian Thorne wrote a reference book about the Godzilla character at large as one in a series of monster books... in 1977. He wrote no "novelization" of "Destroy All Monsters." There's just a little two page mini-synopsis (that claims it's the year 2000 rather than the proper 1999). And I don't need to look on Amazon; I have THAT book.
There is no novelization of "Destroy All Monsters" in English or Japanese. Again, link me or STFU. LINKS not "go to Amazon." Link. Or stop.
Liar. You have no such thing.
"怪獣総進撃/Kaiju Soshingeki" was never novelized in Japan. They had a manga adaptation, but not a novelization.
If you can't read Japanese, how do you know it mentions this "safeguard" nonsense. Again, LIAR.
Link us a picture of the book or STFU.
No. That's absolutely wrong. In none of the Japanese movies do they ever say any such thing. The Japanese Godzilla was always a product of the atom bomb tests (except for that Shin nonsense). Again, you either made that up or heard it from someone who made it up.
You need to stop spreading these lies and misinformation.
Oh, bitch, bitch, bitch.
Hush.
Yeah, it's all over the place.
People that didn't like this movie, all I hear from you is "I hate fun."
He apparently wasn't because there's behind the scenes footage of Keaton in full makeup speaking to the crew in his real voice saying, "I haven't had this much fun making a movie since... 'Beetlejuice'!"
10-10. I had a hellaciously fun time seeing the movie. And it was even better the second time around with friends.
"Beetlejuice" is the superior movie. But "Beetlejuice Beetlejuice" is more fun.
Apparently Burton tried to make something with the Maitlands at the end of the movie, but took it out of the final cut because he said something like "All the de-aging AI in the world isn't enough to make this work." Something like that.
"Eastwood's ego was too big to play Harmonica."
"I can't imagine Eastwood playing Harmonica"
And he didn't. But also, he was not slated to play Harmonica. He was meant to be the Man With No Name. Harmonica was invented when it became apparent Eastwood would have nothing more to do with Leone.
You're talking about something that never happened like it did. You're not wrong about Eastwood's ego (he was already pretty annoyed that Lee Van Cleef stole "For a Few Dollars More" away from him and Eli Wallach did same in GBU), but Leone didn't care about any of that and you're conflating things that are not germane.
"I wanted to see how they'd win against a OP villain w/o the helmet."
You saw that. That's literally how they save the universe(s). Don't like that they didn't do it with violence? That's on you.
^^^^ This one's your answer.
Seriously, nobody went with Scott Eastwood for the Man With No Name? I would say it was the obvious choice, but apparently, it's not.
He's Chaotic Good.
When the Man With No Name ministers to the dying Confederate boy for no other reason than it was the right thing to do and then lets him keep his duster, the universe immediately rewards him with something infinitely cooler to wear. Tuco obviously had no interest in the poor boy and Setenza likely would've just shot him to put him out of his misery.
Godzilla's been woke as fxxk since 1954.
If you have a problem with "woke," then Godzilla isn't for you.
Oh, hell, those are terrible! These are not the real episodes... they are a [poor] recreation of them. Look carefully: the words are not in the proper positioning and the fonts aren't the same.
I want to watch the real show that I'd been watching since '93, not some fancy recreation of it just because it's a little sharper.
A cameo wasn't happening. Stallone and producer Irwin Winkler are feuding because Winkler did some shady backdoor deal to get the rights to Rocky all for himself, which apparently is in violation of the deal made between Stallone, Winkler, and other "Rocky" producer Robert Chartoff back in the 70s. Stallone has said he would love to do "Creed IV" with Jordan directing... but the caveat is that Winkler cannot be involved.
The end credits claims Stallone is an "executive producer," but he's come out and said he had absolutely nothing to do with the making of the movie.
"they could have just killed him off, off-screen, between the events of Creed II and Creed III."
Get therapy, will ya?
Besides, Irwin Winkler said that Rocky will not be dying while he's still alive. He already saved Rocky from being killed by Stallone in "Rocky V" and Ryan Coogler in "Creed." Killing the character now is just stupid.