MovieChat Forums > Geff > Replies
Geff's Replies
Rings of Power is for children and adult children. House of the Dragon is for adults and adult pedophiles.
How do you know that it's not the Truman Show? Maybe we are surrounded by a giant ball and there are moving images projected onto the inside of that giant ball and we are looking at the images when we look with our eyes and telescopes? You can't know.
I don't know what you are trying to imply. George Lucas's lies are a matter for serious discussion.
No.
"Yes, because I’d like to know why you called me a liar."
You are a liar because you lie.
"You didn’t give me anything new to work with, so I persisted."
Everything is the thing that you are lying about.
"I’m not the one being evasive."
DOUBT!
"Why do you refuse to answer a straightforward question?"
You are a liar because you lie, the thing that you lie about is everything. Those are the facts.
You just repeated the same question, but with more words.
Everything, you are lying about everything. That's what a liar does.
Then you are a liar.
You understand yourself so well.
You didn't get the themes and allegories and deeper meaning, ofcourse.
I just looked up the word sarcastic.
"marked by or given to using irony in order to mock or convey contempt."
If you mean i'm trying to mock leftist midwits, yes. I don't need irony to do that though. Their stupidity is enough.
You didn't get it.
It's an allegory.
WW represents Mary, mother of Christ. The guy is God. Mary cannot know God, not really. And wishing to know God is a kind of sin. That's the major theme in the film. But, you probably missed all of it because you are a miseducated midwit. You can thank your leftist teachers for that.
The invisible plane is Christ.
That's what you think because you didn't get it.
You don't understand it, that's it. It's because you are dumb. You do not understand the layers of complexity.
Actually, it has everything to do with art.
Actually, you are wrong.
What's a "psychopathy" I don't know what that is. Is a "psychopath" a kind of identity, like "American", or "man", or "Wall Street stock broker", etc?
It has come to my attention that in order to truly appreciate American Psycho, Alpeis and Possessor the audience must first engage with certain ideas and confront the notion of the "spook", or the abstraction.
Haneke's Funny Games comments on this idea. The impenetrability of the art and the audience's biases are part of the joke.
The movie is not only about identity. If it were a movie only about identity it would have been good enough. But, it also explores the idea of radical freedom and its interaction with expectations of others. Neo is expected to be the one, he wears the robe.
Vos's family are like Morhius and the other people who expect Neo to be a certain kind of person. Most importantly, the expectation of the abstraction of the "good".
The issue of identity is also explored in American Psycho, Alpeis and Perfect Blue. Perfect Blue hyperfocuses on expectation, but the character is still internalizes the abstraction of the good.
American Psycho explores good, but doesn't explore the interaction with expectations to the same extent.
Alpeis explores the role.
Possessor seems to me to have a good mix of all of the themes of the aforementioned films.
What do you mean by "fully formed"? I don't know what that means.
Is Vos's identity more "fully formed" than Neo's identity? Certainly not, and that's the point. Neo is swept up in the narrative of his identity. The imposition of his identity is clear, but he never rejects it. Vos is nobody, and it is everybody.
I don't know those things. Can you show me them?