Mikeyg24's Replies


Hence the maturity numb nuts! Well movies and shows make mistakes all the time it doesn't mean they're intending to lie. The show was based primarily on Stephen Ambrose' book and it's therein the error first rears it's head. When Blithe was shot at the farm house evidently he appeared to have been shot in the neck severing the carotid artery as shown in the series which, even using modern techniques, is invariably fatal in minutes. However he was actually shot in the collar bone. Here's where the problems start. Blithe was taken to a military hospital and sent home. He never returned to the European Theater. By all accounts Easy Company who returned to England, back to the ETO and lost a whole load of buddies on the road to Germany didn't actually know what happened to him and it seems it was assumed he had succumbed to his injuries in Normandy. When Ambrose interviewed them for his book this is the story he was told and went with it. When Hanks and Spielberg picked up the project they accepted this version of events and that's what we see in the series. It was still pretty poor researching considering the entire episode was based on him but the ending was as a result of error, not lies! They're the same actor. [url]https://moviechat.org/nm0362766/Tom-Hardy[/url] To be fair Monica was a lot younger when she dated fun Bobby. People mature quicker than others. To be fair this entire forum was imported from IMDb. The ratings are existent from when Friends was a lot fresher. That's a very good explanation because I always figured it was a futile question myself! That's pretty diverse genre list. Maybe 1 and 2 but I can't say I cared for 4 and 5 and Batman I think I could I could take it or leave it. I always got the impression that the Warden took Tommy out because of the comment Andy made about not spilling the beans about the scams if he ever got out! Andy had too much dirt on him and maybe he feared blackmail, he knew Andy was a damn sight smarter. As long as Tommy was around Andy would be like a dog with a bone. No more Tommy, no more bone! That's true it still comes across gappy though. Now I only noticed it after umpteen times of watching but when Red rigs the tarring job there's nothing up to that point to suggest that Andy and Red had become friends to the extent that Red would include him in the fix. What I mean is yeah Red says "I think it's fair to say I liked him straight away" and he narrates Andy's first two years in SS but there's nothing in his narration to suggest they were becoming friends nor anything visual like eating lunch together to demonstrate the development of a close relationship! In fact Red even says that Andy kept pretty much to himself! When YOU read into the subtext it might be clear. The only flaw I see in your theory is that you assume everyone agrees that the Lybians finding Doc is a plot hole. Why?