MovieChat Forums > Devo-McDuff > Replies
Devo-McDuff's Replies
I'd say it was a fairly intrinsic part of the story. They were in love and had an extremely strong bond, that's what created the conflict in their decision making all the way through the film.
Ask yourself if you'd have considered it forced if they'd have been heterosexual and kissed? (and there's a million movies in the past with similar themes where that's the case, no one gets their knickers in a twist about them). There are gay people in the world, quite a lot of them. Why should it only ever be the majority represented? To me it doesn't matter if they were hetro or homo, the story is the same regardless. People get uncomfortable with this stuff and throw out the woke agenda nonsense, they should really just grow up.
The OP has demonstrated he's clearly a homophobe.
Agreed.
The street name had something similar in the name, can't recall exactly what it was now. Also, Frank and his inbred daughter were fairly savage/barbarian.
There was a lot more up with this movie than the title.
I mean it was one big hole with sprinkling of plot really.
Frank. Old guy who needs you to hand him a gun. The scary breast feeding monster lady was worse I reckon.
Did you watch it? I mean it explained everything in intricate detail by the end, no room for ambiguity really.
Because the writer wasn't inventive enough to think of something outside of the standard horror flick trope.
I wonder where Colm would live?
Might have to kip a few night's at Pardaic's a few inches away in the other other bed, bit awkward.
He said fiddles, which definitely meant sexual abuse.
Ha, they're massive aren't they. Looks like a tubby elf.
She definitely does do that, I'm still unsure why.
I think you're right.
That was the point my friend.
That's ridiculous. Butterfly effect doesn't equate to blame.
Though I do blame Mr Kellogg, if he hadn't invented Coco Pops then Iceman wouldn't have had them for breakfast and therefore would have had his 2nd favourite cereal, Weetabix. This would have given him the sharpness and dexterity require to take and make the shot leaving Goose free to sing about balls of fire and take Meg in his arms and lose her forever.
She used to be a great actress. That's not really feasible anymore considering her face doesn't move.
He was a bit stressed, what with trying to get out of dodge with imminent terminal cancer.
Yep. How did you manage to miss the massive solar panels on the roof? They were visible in quite a few scenes and we destroyed at one point by the underpass.
I wondered if the end was her mental breakdown and distortion of reality, seen from her view. I think the brief flashes to the look of horror on her parent's faces and Alice screaming "Help" was what was actually happening and she had kidnapped Alice to return her to her parents and redeem herself.
Visually and stylistically it was very impressive. I don't think they did a good job of telling the story though, you could have moved around the order of most of the scenes and it would barely make a difference.