MovieChat Forums > Costumer > Replies
Costumer's Replies
Tom Hardy is not in this movie. I assume you mean Tom Holland.
And what does it matter if he's Jewish or not? What does it matter if he was a dancer? And since I think I see what you are trying to imply, what would it matter if he's gay?
I'll give you the answer. Absolutely nothing. None of those things mean anything. Nor do any of these things suggest or imply that kids shouldn't see this.
How, precisely, am I a philistine? Do you understand the meaning of the word? I'm well educated enough to have a reasonable vocabulary. That doesn't make be better or worse than any other person. The OP seems to think that 90s kids are somehow different or more infantile than other generations. That may be open to debate. However, his examples are ridiculous. He seems to think that previous generations cut off connections to their youth when they became "adults." My contention is that he is in error. I am of those previous generations. His argument is in error.
Absolutely everything has been done before. Everything. So what you're saying is equivalent to water is wet.
I believe the reference is that the city was built and is inhabited by the species from a thousand (metaphorically) planets, thus, the City of a Thousand Planets.
Why? People can look young. There is no particular reason why he should be aged.
“When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.”
C. S. Lewis
He may seem young. But Dane is 31. Cara is only 25.
My, how pretentious. People have "no business" keeping in touch with people from High School and College? Sonny, I'm not a nineties kid. I was a kid when Kennedy was assassinated. I keep in touch with High School and College friends. My parents were born in the 20's. They kept in touch as well.
I watch movies from the 20's to today. I don't care when a movie was made. If I like it, I'll watch it again. If I ddin't, I won't.
Movies have been remade since films first came into existence. Its nothing new. Remakes can be good or bad. They should be judged on their own merits; though I do think its risky to remake a film when the original was, and is, well thought of.
I don't know you're age, but you sound like the typical youngsters who try to assert their adulthood by disparaging their youth. Generally a hallmark of the young is this tendency to disparage youth. Mature people can generally enjoy both youth and adult oriented material.
No.
Late reply here, but this seems obvious.
First its unlikely (very, very, unlikely) that Etruscan women wore snoods.
Second, Etruscans don't exist today. They were the primary power on the Italian peninsula until the rise of Rome. They've been functionally extinct for 2500 years.
In the context of the episode this was a collection of "Etruscan" snoods collected from various archeological finds or from artifacts from various prominent persons.
So its not Etruscans collecting snoods. Its a collection of various snoods which were worn by different Etruscans.
In the comics, Diana Prince is her secret identity in man's world
It did. As I recall, there were only 6 Germans. But he did shoot the entire group that was charging him; and he did it starting with the back, so the soldiers in front thought they still had the rest supporting them.
And, since I hate bad grammar, it's "rewrote" not "rewrited."
No, you remember correctly. He killed Quill's mom because if he saw her again, he would stay with her. There is no indication he killed the mothers of his other children.
That would be Hyde.
Bram seemed to me to be the least radicalized of the Red Hands.
And to those blaming him for everything, what blame? Should everyone do nothing because something might go wrong. The Red Hand was too radical, obviously. But Bram's other activities seem normal for oppressed people living under a dictatorship.
And do you see the irony of your comment. "no one does that anymore because it's become too predictable." So movies predictably don't have happy endings. So the happy ending was actually the less predictable one.
While I would have preferred the title remained "Philosopher's" in the US, your comment is ridiculous. The name Philosopher's stone is not common here and Philosopher has no inference of magic. I'm sure there are many American phrases that Brits would find unfamiliar or ridiculous. That doesn't imply Brits are "dumb."
Not at all trying to be superior or disdainful. But the word you want is clique.
You are making the error that science fiction requires absolute adherence to known physical laws. Science fiction ranges from space opera to hard SF to Soft SF. Many concepts are explored in SF using many known, extrapolated or completely made up physical law.
Ultimately, though, SF should say something about the human condition.
Arrival fits the criteria completely.