Rotten Tomatoes 100%
Metacritc 76
https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-woman-king
IMDb 3.6
Who is going to the first brave soul on Metacritic and RT to give this a negative rating?
Review bombing? Shocking
shareInternet trolls can't stand the thought that it might actually be good.
shareI'm not a fan of pandering and wokeness, but I would never rate a movie low (or at all) unless I'd actually seen it. I won't even rate a movie if I'd seen it only partially.
shareI don't actually rate movies other than in my Vudu account, but I agree with that. It would be nice if ratings actually meant something anymore, but the reviewer ratungs are no different at this point.
shareIts more about statistics..in the u.s. this group makes up about 13% of the population.
The majority wont relate...
Fun fact, that 13% is responsible for 90% of crimes..
what about the RT score? isnt that the opposite of review bombing?
shareMovies that promote pseudo history for political purposes deserve to be review bombed.
shareNO
shareWhat do you mean no?
shareTHE OPPOSITE OF YES.
shareJudging form the trailer this movie promotes pseudo history. And it does that for political (woke) purposes..
shareIT IS A MOVIE...THEY ARE ALL PSUEDO HISTORY...THIS "WOKE" THING YOU DICKHATS KEEP CRYING ABOUT ISN'T REAL...HAVE YOUR MOM MAKE YOU SOME MORE HOT POCKETS AND RELAX,KIDDO...THE WORLD IS BIG ENOUGH FOR EVERYBODY...EVEN IF THEY DON'T LOOK LIKE YOU.
shareNope, not all movies are pseudo history. If a movie about historical Europe portrayed Moors conquering Spain this different, there would be complaining.
shareYOU PROBABLY DON'T REALIZE HOW WRONG YOU ARE...IT'S KIND OF SAD...BUT MOSTLY PATHETIC...EVEN THE MOST HISTORICALLY ACCURATE FILM EVER IS STILL PSUEDO HISTORY AS IT HAS ALL BEEN INTERPRETED BY MODERN FILMMAKERS,ACTORS,ETC...AND ALL DETAILS CANNOT BE KNOWN.
shareNo they don't. They just insert a few characters and their personal storylines. The surrounding is mostly historically accurate.
shareLMAO🤣
shareGet off this board. Are you seriously trying to spread your hatred still? No one takes you seriously.
shareExplain to me how am I wrong.
shareThe scoreboard is me 34 you 0. I have won every debate we have had. Why should I continue to debate someone like you any longer? Do you deserve that kind of respect?
shareAgain no arguments. You lost every single debate we had because you simply ignore my arguments and say "me 30, you 0". That sir is not an argument.
shareNope I say that after dismantling your points. So are you saying a movie can not have an alternate take on history? You also claimed whitewashing does not exist which I find hilarious.
shareNo you just ignore my points. A movie should not have an alternate take on history if it will be perceived as accurate by large part of the audience. Why not just make a more historically accurate movie unless you want to engage in propaganda?
shareIt is not their responsibility how people will take it. It is people's choice if they want to see it or not. If you do not want to see it then do not see it, it is rather simple. There are historically accurate films but there are also alternate takes on history. Such as Inglorious Basterds or Once Upon a time in Hollywood.
shareIt's not illegal, but if they chose to make a historically inaccurate movie that the audience will see it as accurate, then they are knowingly engaging in propaganda and should be called out for it by people on forums like this one.
shareLol call them out all you want. Not every movie that is historically inaccurate is propaganda. Some stuff is made for entertainment. Either way Tarantino has had lots of success with alternate portrayals of history. He has produced award winning films. What have you produced other than crap in toilet?
shareYou're right, not every movie that is historically inaccurate is propaganda and that depends on how the audience will perceive it. If this movie had aliens in it it would not be propaganda as it would be obvious it's not accurate. But this movie is just believable enough to be perceived as accurate and that's the problem. Millions of dumb Americans will think that's how it was.
shareNope just because someone perceives it as real is it a fault of the film. You remind me of those parents who wants a gay movie banned because you disagree with the material. It is your job to censor it not the world's job. You sound like an entitled brat posting crap like that.
share
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews
based on 139 Ratings
See All
2.9
Oops...
not one negative review, shocking...
77
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews
based on 47 Critic Reviews