Biased?
Shyamalan is not even in my top 20 favorite directors of all time, Split and Unbreakable don't reach my top 50 movies, but I enjoyed them enough to watch Glass, expecting the same, but instead I was blown away from what it delivered.
Delusional? Dude, we need to stop these nonsense and enjoy movies on what they are. With a reduced number of effects and based only on serious actors: McAvoy (who was indeed in beast mode), Jackson and Willis who reminded people he can still act, this movie delivered big time.
All three of them offered so much, most of ala James, that peformed at some amazing level. His take on the beast is something that you rarely saw in the past decade in a mainstream movie.
I agree that the movie has some small flaws, they all do, even Rear Window has some, but this one delivers big time. The plot twist was not the train, but what follows and the build up for that moment is, in my opinion, spectacular. Again, you don't see stuff like that these days.
You call my statement biased and delusional. Dude, I considered, from my point of view, The Nolan trilogy inferiour to Watchmen, which is, imho, the very best superhero movie ever made, however, I can acknowledge what Nolan did and how he put the bar at a very, very, very high level.
Reviews, ha, Imdb? Rotten Tomatoes? hahaha, Are you serious? Those were relevant back at the end of the 2010, now are a full band of PR Based post and reviews. That is biased, fella.
Imdb forgot how not to be. Why the hell do you think we don't have the famous boards of discussion there?
Remember that those "critics" that you love so much, at some point, said that Avengers is the best superhero movie ever made.
Your points and arguments are zero. You wrote half of page to say that I am deluded, biased and critics say.
Please, do yourself a favour, next time when you want a debate come with real arguments and details, but I suspect that your movie preferances and opinions are based on imdb.
reply
share