why not send an army of terminators back...
since obviously one at a time has failed numerous times? Well, two since movies three thru six don't count anymore.
sharesince obviously one at a time has failed numerous times? Well, two since movies three thru six don't count anymore.
shareThey wouldn't be able to defend themselves (considering all the trouble they have dealing with just one) and there wouldn't be much of a movie.
shareTerminators should have followed after T2, three T-800's (Played by Arnie) are sent back to the 90's to kill the John and Sarah, but among the three Terminators is one reprogrammed (again by future John Connor).
shareAlso, they can probably freely choose ANY time, so why not go to where Sarah is just a baby and just teleport right on top of it? Sarah would be dead before the terminator would even be able to print "Target Terminated: Mission Accomplished" on its visuals.
This begs the question; why did Skynet choose 1984 in the first place, when it should've realized that it didn't work, because Kyle and Sarah stopped that particular terminator?
It also begs the question, at what point does Skynet know what happened in 1984? Shouldn't it already know the 1984 events before even sending anything through, and thus knowing that it didn't work, and thus alter the time and date? Shouldn't also know to not let the humans know what time it sent the terminator to, so they can't interfere and stop it? I don't know how the humans knew the year, or if the machine simply remained in the settings Skynet had set it to before sending the terminator through, but Skynet should have done something about that.
When you start asking questions, you open the floodgates and everything becomes a 'wait a moment, why didn't Skynet..'-thing.
Yes, this is the core issue with almost any time travel movie. If Skynet succeeded in killing Sarah (or John) Connor, all it would have done is create a new and parallel timeline in which the resistance doesn't exist and Skynet rules supreme. Call this Timeline2.
However, as far as the Skynet in Timeline1 is concerned nothing has changed. To anyone in Timeline1, it would simply appear as if they sent off a T800 into the past and it never came back.
The whole premise of this franchise is faulty. Even Endgame suffers from this issue, though they try to get around it with the whole time travel GPS bit that ensures they return to the same timeline they left.
If there is just one timeline, i.e. not an infinite number of timelines, then all the paradoxes you mentioned would apply and the movie would make no sense.
The only time travel movie that I'm aware of that tried to be logical was Looper. There is only one timeline, but any changes ripple up and down the timeline (past AND future) to maintain consistency. When Bruce Willis changes the past, his memories also change to be consistent with that changed past. This introduces its own issues though... for example, his memories should instantly 'update', but in the movie they don't. Probably for dramatic storytelling purposes.
As fun as they were, the Back to the Future movies were terrible for their time travel 'rules', mixing up parallel timelines and self-consistent models randomly for the purposes of the story.
Saving that for the finale
shareNoting that almost every time travel story has some contradictions and plot weaknesses, there are a few things you could cite to explain this. First and most obvious - that it takes a holy ѕhitload of power to send even a single person or terminator back in time, which increases exponentially the further back you want to go. Also the nuclear war destroyed a great deal of humanity's military capability. That was essential for Skynet's takeover. Against individual humans with nothing heavier than small arms a T-800 or T-1000 is effectively invincible. But humans in the future got good at destroying them. That's how they won.
Large enough caliber bullets can penetrate the 800's armor and high temperature incendiaries should be able to destroy the shape shifters (since molten steel did it). If Skynet didn't know precisely when and where to strike, I mean an exact location and time, there would have to be a hunt and too many operational terminators in the past would draw the government's notice. They'd probably think initially these killers were part of some terrorist group, but after the first direct engagement would realize they were dealing with highly advanced machines. Either that or alien invaders. There'd be a massive response to crush this unknown threat.
Against well equipped soldiers the machines would probably still inflict casualties at a steep ratio. The US army has no experience dealing with these things. But we have the numbers and they would eventually be taken out. So if Skynet sends multiple terminators it would have to be quite a horde. Unless as I said it knew precisely where its target(s) would be at a given moment in time. Then the mission could be carried out quickly - and local law enforcement would be badly outclassed if they tried getting in the way. Unfortunately from the future's point of view, the Connors spent their entire lives off the grid. Skynet would have almost no information to work from.
From what they've said time travel was a late-in-the-war development, and Skynet's resources were dwindling as defeat drew near. Gathering an army of terminators and generating the amount of power needed to send them might've been well beyond its capability at that stage.