if you think "Skin White As Snow" must mean 1800s Germanic European, you're functionally retarded

...that a lot of modern whites (caucasians) can't read and comprehend is precisely why you're in this predicament in the first place (those are the same people... 99% of whom don't know what the word "objectively" means). none of that addresses anything

if your skin or skin of any caucasian you know has skin as white as snow you need head to an emergency room and have it looked at immediately no joke.

since i have to spell it out (apparently 😔): snow is the operative descriptor to focus on, not "white". "white" is a color or a race, by early 19th century german (and still modern) standards. 19th century snow looked exactly like what it does today, not peachy average caucasian phenotype skin's color. toss any of these people into a snow pile, and you can find them easily, easier than finding waldo. but i know you know this .. okay maybe not you, but many others.

every rationale for these people's preferred imagined race is refutable precisely by the text of the story itself (or lack of text in the case of explicit description). people who want to read meaning into the text have apparently a best shot: (hopelessly) argue that it was meant to be "skin as racially white as snow" and that the entire description is a supposed to be metaphor since snow and race are only related metaphorically. but they still have problems that can't be overcome: 1) claiming with any authority what "white" is supposed to mean (insurmountable hurdle by itself since only the author is the authority), and 2) reasoning that such a claim which leads to metaphor would somehow undeniably be any more valid than the equally plausible reading (color white, within a fantastical story), which leads to a more literal description (which could then also be argued to be clearer, since a literal description needs no subjective "clever" consideration and interpretation that a metaphor does).

the entire text leads only to ambiguity for all of it. race and ethnicity are not explicitly mentioned. either must be subjectively interpreted in. these people all know this. their conclusion in not absolutely defensible. so they argue around it, without success, and just hope enough repetition of their certain belief wills it into reality. thats your, and their, ambiguity problem to deal with. you have grimms themselves to thank for your forced corrected recognition of your previously held delusion. be sure not to ever blame anyone else

oh and by the way if in desperation you want to take "skin racially white as snow" route, even more good luck with that: you now get to explain that metaphor. then you get to explain why skin is specifically referred to, when many phenotypes were actually, otherwise collectively considered for race. then you get to explain why "skin white" refers to race but "lips red" refers to color (ooh or maybe red meant chinese? 😆). THEN you get to explain why your interpretation is infallible/objective, even though interpretations are inherently subjective. have fun 👍

..it's fitting that clowns of all races/colors paint their skin actually white.. perfect metaphor

oh and just for fun there's a very much more fitting closer to accurate snow white riiiight here 🤭👇

you seem mentality ill.

seriously. Get help you fucking leftwing nut job.
Get off the internet and into a bed/rubbercell at an asylum.