MovieChat Forums > Snow White (2025) Discussion > You can thank Peter Dinklage for the CGI...

You can thank Peter Dinklage for the CGI dwarves


He was the one that caused the drama that lead to Disney deciding to go that route. Funny of him to call the casting offensive after he made his fame and money playing a dwarf.

reply

Did he lead the charge in the "don't call them woke" people deciding that it was bigoted to cast little people to play dwarves and other such short characters?

It is odd, considering that other than straight white people (casting gay people as straight or non white people to play someone white, even a historical character, should be celebrated, of course), they usually want people to be the thing they are playing.

reply

Very selfish given he made his money from playing a horny dwarf. It's not like people of his stature are about to be cast as Rambo type characters.

reply

Well he was cast as the Toxic Avenger in the remake. Not Rambo but it's a more action oriented performance. Although it hasn't gotten an official release date in almost a year....

reply

CGI dwarves are better than the bizarre "magical creatures" they showed before.

reply

Preach!

reply

The dwarf acting community must be pissed at him. I wonder what he will say about this new retooling.

reply

Absolutely they must. He either didn't think it through (in which case he's an idiot), or he didn't care (in which case he's a dick).

reply

I think his heart was in the right place. He's arguably the most famous actor with dwarfism at the moment and he decided to speak out against roles that could be insensitive or mockingly done. I imagine his sentiments are shared by some in the community whilst others disagree. His speaking out potentially robbed seven actors of the roles of a life time, those seven are the real victims in all of this.

reply

Actors need to learn to keep their fucking mouths shut when they are not reading lines written by someone else.

reply

👍👍

reply

Talk about kicking out the ladder underneath you after climbing to the top. The Dwarf Acting Community now hates his guts.

reply

The Dwarf Acting Community--about three miles down the road from Munchkin Land. Twee little huts and tiny horses.

reply

I don’t know how I feel about the CGI dwarves. It’s the weakest aspect of the trailer. It’s entirely possible that the CGI is unfinished and it will look much better in the final movie. I hope so. If not, then they should’ve gone with 80’s - 00’s style prosthetics.

reply

I think it would have been better with real actors using appliance makeup. If they use CGI dwarves, why not just make the whole thing a cartoon? Otherwise it's just a long cereal commercial.

reply

Before CGI, the options for putting smaller creatures on screen were either find a little person and use prosthetics or some camera/perspective trickery. That, or stop motion I suppose.

I'm not sure what was denigrating or stereotypical about that. Should they have used average sized people and used special effects to make them seem smaller?

If a character was unusually tall, like the xenomorph in Alien, they'd find someone unusually tall for the part. That doesn't seem any different to me.

Everyone in that business is so terrified of being accused of something and having their career damaged/ended, I doubt anyone speaks out.

reply

'If a character was unusually tall, like the xenomorph in Alien, they'd find someone unusually tall for the part. That doesn't seem any different to me.'

You're talking sense! Stop it at once!

reply

I want to be charitable and say movies like "The Gnome Mobile" and "Darby O'Gill" etc., not to mention the Lord of the Rings/Hobbit movies had regular size actors playing gnomes and dwarves. It's pretty rare for movies with fantasy dwarves to hire exclusively people with dwarfism or midgets, like Wizard of Oz, Time Bandits, Willow, etc. but I think it's a lot more interesting when they do as it shows a lot more effort went in to finding actors to fit the part.

Disney dropped the ball on offering up an opportunity to create 7 new Billy Barties, Warwick Davises, or Peter Dinklages. Not only was this a decision that stirred up more controversy than there would have been otherwise, but it also already cost them a lot of money in terms of reshoots, and then on top of that changing their minds and papering it all over with CGI. I'm sure it'll cost them in terms of box office, especially when compounded with Zegler's big mouth. Between the two of them, I'm sure Dinklage and Zegler have guaranteed that this movie won't make its money back. In fact, they may have cost Disney hundreds of millions of dollars, simply by offering their opinions.

reply

'Between the two of them, I'm sure Dinklage and Zegler have guaranteed that this movie won't make its money back. In fact, they may have cost Disney hundreds of millions of dollars, simply by offering their opinions.'

That's a sobering thought.

reply

The great sin of Zegler is less her political opinion but rather her decision to insult half of the potential audience by threatening Republican voters. She appears completely indifferent to the countless people who worked on the film and to those who paid her an exorbitantly high salary.

reply