"Facial expression is a fundamental, important aspect in portraying emotion", whilst that's very true, if you're a human, it's not how they wanted it to be like this time round.
If they made every character use every human facial expression in a live action film I think it would look rather creepy. It's works in a cartoon (like the original) but not this.
The whole point of making it live action, making it look more real, etc, is to exclude the necessity for total facial expressions because obviously animals don't use or have as many facial expressions as we humans do.
Did you know that a huge percentage of communication is via body language? The idea behind all this is, again, to make it more animalistic. You must not be an animal lover, or maybe you are, but either way you don't seem to be in tune with understanding body language/communication from specie to specie. A dog or cat, for example, doesn't have to smile to convey they're happy to see you. Equally they don't have to frown or cry to convey they're upset or scared. That's how it works across the specie gap. Body language is universal and constant, whereas oral/verbal language is not.
If you can allow the fact they didn't emote human expressions to ruin the movie for you then maybe the movie isn't as magical to you as you thought.
However, I must say, if you have a problem with this then I'm surprised you haven't mentioned the fact that each and every specie in the film can all speak the same oral language 😆 Now THAT is far-fetched.
reply
share