MovieChat Forums > Amanda Knox (2016) Discussion > Nick Pisa - Awful Journalist

Nick Pisa - Awful Journalist


Only watched the first half of this so far but I'm horrified by Nick Pisa and his contribution to the document. A young girl was murdered and he's so exited about getting his name in the headlines and compares the excitement to sex? Crass and insensitive. Don't think I can watch the second half if he appears again.

reply

His line about not giving up sources and having journalistic integrity were hilarious.

reply

he writes for the daily mail. seriously. he's a complete cliche

reply

Totally agree. Absolute scumbag.

reply

For real...what a narcissistic prick.

reply

Just like all brits

reply

Just as all yanks are the same as Amanda Knox - treacherous murdering b!tches!!

reply

lmao, you're an idiot.

reply

What an absolute assclown.
It particularily struck me when he recounted the anecdote of someone talking about the murder "hoping that Meredith hadn't suffered too much" and Amanda had allegedly responded saying "of course she suffered, she had her f-ing throat slit". He interpreted this as her being "crazy" and thereby guilty. I'd say that is a completely sane response to a rediculous statement.

reply

She didn't allegedly say it, Meredith's friends testified she said it and no it isn't a completely sane response, any more than turning cartwheels is perfectly sane behaviour, nor is it ridiculous for a friend to hope her friend didn't suffer.
Knox's callous behaviour and remarks are yet more reasons still to suspect her to go with the rest of the overwhelming evidence against her.
In the words of Nick Pisa, she's a loon.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

reply

Whether she said it or not, I maintain it is a reasonable thing to say, perhaps not the most sensitive thing to say to a greiving friend but remember that she too was in schock. Everyone does not react the same or the way you are expected to react in a traumatic situation. These expectations seem to specifically hit women harder. The fact that you cite "overwhelming evidence" when there isn't any to be found makes me suspect that you are judging with gut feeling rather than looking at facts.

reply

There's no whether about it, she said it. She said it in a gloating tone, turned cartwheels and engaged in other inappropriate behaviour and the fact that you falsely claim no evidence tells me that you aren't aware of the facts of this case.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

reply

Yes, that is correct Amanda Knox is a lunatic psychopath who got away with murder and rape because of politics and corruption. But it will never get away from her. We promise. Knox and Sollecito will never have lives of their own because they are already outcasts of society. Basically we own them and their futures of permanent poverty and re-incarceration are imminent.

reply

No,she didn't,dude. Stop making things up, and read her book.

reply

Give it up. She's been acquitted twice--that should tell you something,like, oh, I don't know--she's obviously innocent. All the ranting and pointing fingers--too late for that now.

reply

Exactly! I couldn't stand him at all---he acted like the whole trial was a big damn joke or something, and the thing is, the Daily Mail is nothing but a big fat tabloid anyway. So he had a lot of nerve calling himself a "journalist". A REAL journalist would have double-checked the facts and tried to uncover some new ones about the case---but this dude had the nerve to say he couldn't be bothered to make sure the facts of the stories he was reporting on were true---uh, that's what REAL journalists are supposed to do--that's their job. This dude was a joke---honestly, the director could have found somebody better to interview--like a REAL journalist, not some tabloid hack who just threw whatever bull**** he could in his so-called article just to sell the paper. Really, disgusting, tacky, and tasteless.

reply