MovieChat Forums > Barbarians Rising (2016) Discussion > History written by Social Justice Warrio...

History written by Social Justice Warriors.


I'm half way into the 2nd episode, and aside from some really great production values for a few of the battle scenes, this is a melodramatic piece of garbage, written for all the SJW's of the world looking to make everything, including ancient history, a safe space.

Really pathetic how melodramatic EVERYTHING is. The people opposing Rome are ALWAYS portrayed as freedom loving boffins would would be perfect people to one another if only those evil Romans weren't around. As if in reality they weren't busy killing and subjugating everyone they could around them as well.

The world was f#$king brutal no matter were you were, and if you were lucky enough to survive into your 40's you were f#$king old.

Was Rome brutal, ruthless, and relentless in it's expansion? No doubt about it. Name any society worthy of any historical merit that hasn't been so, and you're lying to yourself if you think they weren't the same.

The reason they were so successful isn't because they were more evil than everyone else, it's because they were just better at it. No one in the ancient world was successful by having pillow fights with their advisories.

Very disappointing show.

================

Okay, I'm now into the 3rd episode.

I'm not even going to bother talking about how pathetic this show is anymore. This is just a plea to ANYONE who's imagination is even REMOTELY sparked by what is being portrayed as History to you in this show who has never encountered it before. Please, seek out the real history that took place for any of the events being portrayed. As the actual history is FAR more interesting than the completely manufactured horse sh#t that this show is feeding you.

reply

Excellent review, exactly my thoughts (as a huge Ancient Mediterranean geek) ...it's nothing more than lame propaganda. Also there are a number of errors in the show regarding accuracy but for the eyes it's better than nothing...

reply

The "expert" are celebrities! So disappointing. Hannibal was a Black man? Who knew, eh!

reply

I'm no historian to be sure, but I enjoyed this. The older I get the more history interests me.
While I'm not foolish enough to believe all the fact based on an hour long TV melodrama the show DID provide questions and interests in the subjects as a whole - which is good! So I would watch the show & Google some maps and info. Informative & compelling, good production especially considering the battle scenes.
I see more quality docu-dramas on the way

reply

Yes, I ended with that sentiment in my original post. If this show managed to peak your interest in some of these events, I think that's great, and I encourage you to actively seek out the real stories behind everything this show presented.

You'll find the actual events are far more interesting than this overly dramatic telling that wildly distorts and sometimes whole sale makes things up for the sake of the corny stories they're trying to spin.

No doubt some of the production values with the maps and effects during that battle scenes were great. As a matter of fact, that's all that kept me around as long as it did. Just imagine how great this show could have been if they had those same production values and actually tried to even remotely adhere to the actual history being portrayed? Now that would have been fabulous.

reply

Boudica, Gaiseric, and Attila--barbarians all--were portrayed in the series as ruthless murderers of women and children.

________________________
This signature has been deleted by the poster

reply

I quit watching the show at Boudica in Episode 3 because it was such a garbage retelling of history that I couldn't stomach it anymore, so didn't finish her overly dramatic line readings and butchering of historical facts. So gladly didn't suffer through either Gaiseric or Attila being portrayed as soap opera characters either.

reply

I shut it off into the first episode when race baiting poverty pimp Jesse Jackson showed up to spew whatever racism tinged crap out of his pie hole. history TV for morons. next al Sharpton to tell us the story of Jesus.

reply

Totally agree,a tipical american garbage!
I wonder if they ever heard about Traian's Column,where there's a lot of portrayed stories about the ancient romanians,the dacs if may I say so!
The only thing about our country is when they are saying that the gots crossed the Danube from Romania...

reply

Are you kidding us? How many times do they constantly claim they were warring each other ALL the time. Yes, we know the world was a brutal place, and they say that ALL the time. But it is one thing to fight rival tribes, it's a completely different matter to fight an invading empire, and there is no doubt that the Roman Empire took what it wanted, enslaved people by the thousands, were brutal in their conquest and back stabbed those they negotiated with when the time came. But there are always at least two sides to every story, and the truth is, this documentary was about the Barbarians Rising, and they did just that.

reply

The Roman Empire has had a couple of thousand years of the history books telling their side of the story.

reply

Nope. Not kidding. This show was total garbage.

reply

You had me at SJW. I am giving this series a WIDE berth. Thank you!

reply

This show serves as a correction to the sort of ignorant history being espoused by the average uneducated American (I have a Master's in History and a PHD in Anthropology, and I can assure that virtually everything this poster has said is incorrect).

Historical merit is a horrible, racist term that is no longer ever uttered in Academia. Anthropology has recognized that history was written by the winners and the forensic evidence has proven that virtually all of it was a lie to extend empire and exploitation.

Those in opposition to Rome were not subjugating the peoples around them. They had weapons for defense only and did not have organized militias to perpetrate such crimes (it is the structure that feeds upon the weak, as is true with the US empire today).

No, life was not 'nasty, brutish and short' as the old cliche goes. The fact is that only the infant mortality rate was high throughout history and prehistory. At any time in history, when the average life expectancy was estimated (never accurately calculated) to be from 35-50 (cavemen on the low end and 50 as late as the 1850s), that low average was ALWAYS due to the infant death rate. Neandertals and Cro Mags had effectively created shelters by at least 200,000 years ago and death by accident and predators was not at all common anymore. If you made it past 7 or 8, it was extremely likely that you would live to be 65 (this is true in every single country on earth currently where life expectancy is below 50). Virtually all bones of Neandertals and Cro Mag adults are over 50 years of age and over half are over 60. In the late 1700s, when expectancy was 45, over 80% of the populations lives to be over 70 (Ben Franklin and many of the founding fathers lived to be well into their 80s). When 10% or more of the population dies at ages 0-7, the data is greatly skewed. Even in Roman times, the vast majority of the populace lived well into old age.

There is some inconsistent logic at the close of this myopic, poorly thought, and utterly ignorant post.

Of course, the Romans were more evil. The poster says they were simply better at it, which does in fact logically mean they were more evil. What errebus (and it is an apt name because he does ere about everything) is calling the real history is the brainwashing of thousands of years of white, western propaganda that ignored the actual evidence in order to portray their view of the world as the good and noble one.

It wasn't. Anthropology and fine shows such as this are correcting those errors.

reply

Ha! Well that was an entertaining read at the end of a long day. Did I trigger you there, Yakub?

Funny how IMDB is just filled with self-proclaimed PHD's trolling the messages boards. Good for you using that made up education defending the honor of a 3rd rate soap opera made by the History Channel.

Here, let me trigger you some more:

Trump/Pence 2016
Skittles
White Privilege is a lie
BLM is a terrorist organization

There you go, type another book there PHD. I'll check it out for some more Luls tomorrow. Ha!

reply

Ha! Well that was an entertaining read at the end of a long day. Did I trigger you there, Yakub?

Funny how IMDB is just filled with self-proclaimed PHD's trolling the messages boards. Good for you using that made up education defending the honor of a 3rd rate soap opera made by the History Channel.

Here, let me trigger you some more:

Trump/Pence 2016
Skittles
White Privilege is a lie
BLM is a terrorist organization

There you go, type another book there PHD. I'll check it out for some more Luls tomorrow. Ha!


Bwahahaha! Careful. IMDB mods are all lefty Hildebeast fans. Dont get in trouble for your "hateful" Alt Right ideals!

The entire entertainment industry is dominated by Radical Lefties. It will always be so. We Alt-Right have Clint Eastwood and Mel Gibson. That is about it. The rest are Rad SJW's.

Skittles..Bwahahaha! I like you!

reply

[deleted]

I have already reported you for your anti Semitic rant. Don't bother replying to this post because I am putting you on ignore.

reply

"They had weapons for defense only" Seriously?
"and did not have organized militias to perpetrate such crimes (it is the structure that feeds upon the weak, as is true with the US empire today)." SJW much? for and MA and PHD you make unbalanced and unsupported statements that seem more like political agendas then historical corrections.

reply