why critics hated this film after it won the palme d'or.
I just noticed that critics love this film after it premiered in cannes but soon hated the film after it won the palme d'or.
I just noticed that critics love this film after it premiered in cannes but soon hated the film after it won the palme d'or.
Were they the same critics? Perhaps the first reviews were from the quality press, The Times, The Guardian etc. Papers like The Mail are unlikely to comment on a film like this normally, but when it won the Palme d'or they were kind of forced to notice it, and it is just the kind of thing they would hate from a political standpoint. A film about a single mother and a scrounging benefit claimant who thinks a major heart attack is a reason to stop working? Bloody lefties!
shareCyn
You should use your sarcasm font more often
Perhaps the first reviews were from the quality press, The Times, The Guardian etc.
Be interested to hear which newspapers you would include in the "quality press" category. Maybe then the rest of us can have a little giggle too.
shareBrazilians know The Guardian IS NOT quality press. They blindly deffend the Venezuelan dictatorship, and supported the now-deposed faacist-dressed-as-left governments of Brazil and Argentina, who destroyed those countries' econonomies AND wellfare state to create Putin-style oligarchs. Glenn Greenwald is the worst offender, a sworn enemy of Brazil, abusing our democracy to attack it.
shareSay it for yourself, all Brazilians know that our local press is in the pockets of politicians and even the worker's party in Brazil is hardly an extreme left wing and more of a center-left so, this "fear of the commies" talk is a croc of s*** spread by fear mongers in social media. The opposition did everything in their power to destroy what the worker's party built (and don't lie to yourself or others, the country did great in their earlier years) for fear that their asses would be burned as soon as the Federal Police started chasing and arresting corrupt politicians. Which was an operation started by the now deposed president, coincidence? Of course not. Now the country is in even worst shape than it was before, and I wouldn't be surprised if the investigations start to be shot down.
They'll really hate it once it's nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars.
shareBAFTA will definitely take interest in nominating this movie for sure, but I doubt The Oscars would be interested in this kind of movie.
shareBAFTA will definitely take interest in nominating this movie for sure, but I doubt The Oscars would be interested in this kind of movie.
[deleted]
Well Mark Kermode certainly didn't hate I, Daniel Blake in today's edition of The Film Review on BBC News. Talking to Gavin Esler about the scene in a food bank, he said it was "one of the most profoundly moving things I have ever seen on screen".
He described the film as "very human" and that "you believe in the characters absolutely". He also said it was "a really important film".
I think that the profusion of very negative threads about the film that sprung up here on IMDb long before it had even been released in UK cinemas is something of a testament to how powerful a drama it is. Quite simply these detractors would not be so keen to post insults about a low-budget British movie that they hadn't even seen (because it hadn't been released then) unless they felt it had the power to influence public opinion in favour of benefit claimants and against Tories like Iain Duncan Smith MP. He is the man who must shoulder most of the blame for the current welfare system.
That is the outcome these hate mongers fear most: a collective realisation across the country that the way we treat benefit claimants in Britain is totally unacceptable and must change.
Is there a like flag for the above? ^^
shareThe movie is still sitting at a good critical rating everywhere, so there wasn't a 180 degree turn, there. I think most of the rising animosity that followed the win is actually an internet sensation that doesn't really concern the people who actually reviewed the film as much as people that were hoping another film would win the Palme (some of them just believing the hype for some titles before actually seeing anything that was in competition). Audiard's escellent "Dheepan" experienced the same issue. Every year, so many people seem convinced that the jury's prizes will have to mirror critical reactions and eventually get to act surprised and angry when it turns out that it wasn't the case. This year everyone seemed to bank on "Toni Erdmann" and the abominable "Elle" for some top prizes.
I haven't seen many of the competition titles so far: out of those I have, I believe my ultimate favourite has to be Mungiu's "Bacalaureat", but I still found "I, Daniel Blake" to be an utterly touching and resonant film and I'm very happy for Loach that he got this very deserved prize. Definitely his best and most heartfelt work in a while: it almost had a "Cathy, Come Home" feeling at times. And, for a film that is ultimately pessimistic, it must have the funniest opening scene of the year. Definitely a great tribute to the comedic gifts of its lead.