MovieChat Forums > Charlie's Angels (2019) Discussion > Below Average Looking Angels

Below Average Looking Angels

posted 5 years ago by Guitar King (4913)
8 replies | jump to latest

Discuss.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, is it not?

[–] HarlemEagle42 (17860) 5 years ago

Naomi Scott is legit gorgeous;none of them are ugly anyway for that matter. However, this could had benefited from casting Alexandra Daddario or Kate Upton or Blake Lively. For...reasons.

[–] Guitar King (4913) 5 years ago

You "get it." Too bad Hollywood doesn't.

[–] HarlemEagle42 (17860) 5 years ago

Hell, Elizabeth Banks wouldn't had been bad back in the day.

[–] looper007 (1158) 5 years ago

Banks is still a good looking woman. I think they got Stewart about 5 years too late, she's going through this tomboy Lesbian period and just doesn't do it for me. She was once a beauty. Agree that Naomi Scott is a beauty, Ellie Balinska is a attractive woman. Smart casting, Scott is coming off Aladdin, Stewart still has a fanbase and can still make headlines and Balinska is a newcomer without any hype around her.

I

[–] BigWorm (683) 5 years ago

Naomi Scott is below average? Mother of god, what could possibly be in your wank bank to think that!?

[–] mikethemartian (6779) 5 years ago

You can’t top Jaclyn Smith back in the day.

[–] LLOwens (983) 5 years ago

Have you seen the CA trailer?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSUq4VfWfjE

All three angles are way above average if you ask me.