First images: Kristen Stewart looks like a BOY
Yeap
shareShe always did though.
share
MovieChat Forums > Charlie's Angels (2019) Discussion > First images: Kristen Stewart looks like...
Men like attractive women.
Feminists don't want men to be happy.
Women can't be attractive anymore.
Haha.
None of them hold a candle to Farrah. That's for sure.
The other two besides Kristen Stewart look pretty good though. I'm not a fan of short hair on women.
I'll pass on this flick. The 2000's Charlie's Angels movies were bad enough for me. Anyways, I'm sure there will be plenty of remakes, "reboots", and "reimaginings" coming out in the following weeks from this industry that has no originality or credibility left.
I think she looks better with the short hair. Sometimes a short do is sexy. My problem with her is that she looks like she is staring through the fog of heavy drug addiction. Like she is on the verge of death, about to turn into a zombie.
This cast doesn't inspire me at all. Doubt I'll even give it a look.
I don’t think this cast even inspires itself.
sharejust another one of these reboots nobody asked for...... :/
shareAnd yet this Charlie's Angels reboot is currently #3 on the IMDb STARmeter.
share...and yet I currently don't give half a shit.
Screw IMDb too. Won't ever go back to that site after they ditched the movie message boards because they couldn't handle differing opinions from their own.
...and yet I currently don't give half a shit.
Screw IMDb too.
Ironic you worded your comment in such a way, as trollish posting such as this was the primary reason why IMDb decided to close their forum boards. share
Yeah, I was going to pre-respond in my last post ahead of time to what I knew you were going to reply with, the standard "you're a troll, blah, blah, blah."
So, IMDb closed their boards because I have a different opinion than you about this movie?
Should I not be able to come onto this board and make a comment unless it fits with your excitement for this film?
The fact that you defend IMDb and their closing of the message boards because people say things you don't like is pathetic. I personally think it was the weak thin skinned posters who got offended by everything said...I believe it was their complaining that made it easy for IMDb to destroy a wonderful tool for movie discussion. They also couldn't handle differing political opinions than their own, much like many of the news sites that used to allow comments. "You can have a discussion in our comments section, as long as you say things we agree with."
People with that mindset are frightening.
Anyways, I'm allowed to dislike the idea of this film just as much as you are allowed to be excited for it, and it doesn't make either of us "trolls". Get some new insults, and maybe have a valid discussion about something.
I more than welcome opinions of all sorts--just so long as they don't include vulgar obscenities and violent extremist ideologies.
Like anything in life, you have to draw the line somewhere, or there will be chaos and anarchy, unless that is what you want. From my perspective, people with that mindset are truly frightening.
And are there any types of comments that fit your description of vulgar obscenities or violent extremist ideologies on this Charlie's Angels remake board?
Or does someone posting that Kristen Stewart looks like a boy fit your description of something to be considered frightening?
I'm just trying to figure out what you're trying to convey in this conversation.
You're excited for this movie, right? I'm not. Conversation should be pretty much over I think.
[deleted]
- Your girlfriend looks like a boy...
- One day you'll get a girlfriend, loser!
- She has a beard...
- Incel!
- And look, her chest is flat and hairy...
- Looooooser!
- And she has a big bulge between the legs, dude, she definitely looks like a boy, well, more like a lumberjack...
- She told me she identifies herself as a woman, not believing her is sexist and nazi! Incel! You can't enjoy her kisses as I do!
- (roll eyes)
This movie is woke as fuck. Can't wait.
share