Daniel


Man I'm disappointed in Issa for slipping up in last night's episode! I'm on the edge now waiting for next week lol. Also, Molly is coming off a little too strong with these guys. Moreso with the one that she pressed about sending her a good night text. The one last night was a jerk but she's showing her hand a little too soon with them I think, I can relate to her however.

reply

It's been awhile since I said "no", "no, don't do that", "what are you doing?" in an episode of TV. I can't believe Issa fell for the trap, but it's in character with the show. Lawrence was able to avoid his very obvious trap, but I doubt he will anymore after he finds out what happened.

Molly is a catastrophe. She wants to move way too quickly, and it's a major turn off. She can't even see that she's doing anything wrong.

What was it that Issa saw when she looked down at the bar of soap and the hand soap dispenser? I didn't get the meaning there, other than maybe this was a frequent occurrence for Daniel, and that she got played.

My favorite scene in that episode was the one between Lawrence and his friend. I about died when he said that he was working on his fiancee's divorce and their pre-nup at the same time. Wow.




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply

I had the same reaction, like "come on, don't do it!" And remember in the previous episode when she and Lawrence were buying the new couch? She told Lawrence she'd always let him buy soap dispensers if he wanted them or something like that. I cracked up at Lawrence's friend too though when he said they needed to get his hair fixed because it was uneven and he had a guy for that haha. Looks like Molly's new guy won't stick either if she finds out he had a gay fling.

reply

Oh yeah, I forgot about the soap dispenser thing in the Bed, Bath, and Beyond or whatever it was. Now, it makes sense. The soap dispenser was her reminder that she had someone at home, and that she had effed up for simple instant gratification that she knows will never lead anywhere of substance.

My wife and I think Issa and Lawrence should break up anyway, so hopefully it goes that direction. I think they'd both be happier lowering their own expectations of what a relationship is all about.

Lawrence is bummed he's not "appreciated" by Issa, while Tasha thinks he's great just the way he is. Issa wants something more, but it turns out that "more" is really less. It goes back to her other life choice with her job. Surely there are far better other non-profit agencies to work with than the one she's at. She gets on Lawrence for not settling, when she's actively been settling for a long time with both him and her job. Now that Lawrence is trying to get it together in some form or fashion (even backing off the easy Tasha situation), she nuked their relationship.




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply

Very true. I think Issa and Lawrence should have broke up a few episodes ago and let Issa explore the dating world. She's obviously not happy with Lawrence, even though I do believe she loves him.

reply

No, no no, it wasn't a soap dispenser thing at the BBB store, it was s lotion dispenser.

I look at the soap scene as a metaphor. She's washing her hands of the dirty deed. But she doesn't...or couldn't. She knows "she done done it now!"

Come on guys, film is a visual medium let's analyze accordingly. ;-)

reply

You just said film is a visual medium and ignored the ham fisted directing in that scene. The whole way the shot was framed was to draw your eye to the dispenser (and now that you mention it, it was a lotion dispenser she was looking at in the bathroom, since there was also hand soap).

Without the context of the Lawrence scene with her at BBB, believe me that shot doesn't land...at all. It was still even enormously confusing in context, because I forgot about that scene at the time. I think you're drawing the wrong context. I think it was connected to Lawrence, not to the idea that she can't wash her hands of her dirty deed. You're looking way too deep, when the real answer's right there.

She was so not serious about her relationship with Lawrence that she just fell right into bed with a guy she shouldn't even have been hanging out with under any circumstances based on the state of her current relationship. The juxtaposition with Issa and Daniel and Lawrence and Tasha was supposed to point out the difference in their mindset (Issa was obtuse about what was going on, while Lawrence was completely aware of what was going on with him and Tasha). Lawrence is in, Issa isn't, and now she has to reap what she's sown.




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply

The lotion dispenser scene worked exactly as planned for me. As soon as I saw it I said, "Aww!" But, I watched the episodes back-to-back so I remember the furniture store scene well. Issa doesn't deserve Lawerence at all, btw. It would be one thing if she slipped up during the "break", but to do that after she recommitted to him is disgusting. Still my girl, though. Lol.

reply

Right on. 

And that exaggerated look in her eyes during the scene - ugh.


reply

by emiynu » (Wed Nov 9 2016 13:15:21)
IMDb member since March 2008

...I look at the soap scene as a metaphor. She's washing her hands of the dirty deed. But she doesn't...or couldn't. She knows "she done done it now!"...


I just wanted to chime in to concur with your observation regarding metaphors strewn about the production.

Another example which reinforces your soapy rationale is how dirty Issa's car is when she arrives home after being with her Ex (It's just before her disaterous imagined confession)

Her car & the windsheild BOTH are filthy! Like recent off-roading type filthy.

If you live in the LA area, what with the ongoing drought and all, you know there aren't many ways for your car to end up looking remotely like that. Even if you don't have a garage in which to park overnight.

Dusty? Yes. Muddied? No. You can even end up with water spots on you car on a rainfree night from parking next to automatic sprinklers, but even in this instance, there'd be no mud smeared windsheild.

I applaud HBO for giving this groundbreaking project a chance!


"If people like you don't learn from what happened to people like me..."-Professor Rohl

reply

I'm pretty sure it rained in L.A. a bunch of times this past year. It was an El Nino, when it actually rains there, and the show most definitely would have been in production when that was happening.

Don't go to the hard explanation, go to the easy one. If you saw the two episodes back to back, as another poster had, the symbolism was very obvious. My original issue with it was that I didn't get why there was a soap dispenser and a bar of soap. The reason is because the dispenser was for lotion and not soap. There was a scene regarding a lotion dispenser, and the shot in the show was directly framed for you to be looking hard at the lotion dispenser.

No matter what you think, this show is not slickly directed at all (this show would be amazing if they got Hiro Murai to direct at least one episode). But you can tell Matsoukas really likes Mr. Robot. :/




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply

by nunnehickc » Mon Nov 14 2016 11:29:52
IMDb member since July 2003

...No matter what you think, this show is not slickly directed at all...


Slickly direected or not, there are many things regarding production & dialog that only a person who has some intimate familiarity with LA would "get"

A mud soaked car is something that just doesn't normally happen here (& by "here", I mean LA is where -I- live!)

There are many other things as well, including the name & logo of the non-existant Credit Union.

Some nerds in IT may call them Easter Eggs. They're still there whether you notice them or not. The fact that someone took the time to include them, I find fascinating. Others can just as easily dismiss them as coincidental or simply overlook them & that's OK too.

I won't speak to your judgement regarding any recent amount of rainfall in the LA Basin. I'll just say, if production wanted an outwardly clean car, a few PA's could've handled it in a flash. A muddied/dusty car would've probably required a bit more thought.

I respectfully submit the car was dirty to reflect Issa's immediate "dirty" act of betrayal & not because of some phantom or otherwise non-existant, mud-filled deluge.

I'm glad for your reply! I hope engaged interest like this reaches those that care. I honestly would like to see more programming similar to this become successful & propagate.

Peace!

"If people like you don't learn from what happened to people like me..."-Professor Rohl

reply

Your horse is seeming pretty high there. I lived in Los Angeles for 17 years, and lived in almost the exact neighborhood where the apartment is located for about 4 years.

My point about the rain is that I think you're putting too much into it. A lot of people don't wash their cars for weeks or months in L.A., especially after rain, and when more rain is predicted. It was my running joke that I knew it would rain every time I washed my car, because it usually did. If you're trying to shore up this idea of the dirt on the car meaning something, it should be really really easy to tell if you're right (even though it could simply have been a continuity flaw). There are a minimum of three shots of Issa's car from the previous episode to the shot where you saw the dirt.

1. The parking lot at the school.

2. When her and Daniel were sitting in her car.

3. When she gets home.

If the car is sparkling clean in both of those previous shots, there is *something* to your idea. Of course, it could have rained prior to Issa returning home, and L.A. rain is often very dirty (makes it look like someone poured drop filled dirt on your car if it doesn't rain a ton but rains some). No one's going to clean off that car in that situation. You can also probably look at other cars parked around her, and see if they are noticeably clean. If they are, maybe that means something. Maybe it doesn't. Sometimes a dirty car is just a dirty car. And if it rained in the evening, they're not going to get a bucket of water to wash it off. They don't think the audience will care, though in this day and age the audience loves to analyze every single little thing in every TV show regardless of whether it has meaning.

Check out the stuff I recommended looking into above, and report back. I'd like to give some credence to your theory, even though the easiest one is that the lotion dispenser was meant to represent the conversation with Lawrence (realizing what she might have lost), not the dirtiness of the deed.




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply

by nunnehickc » Mon Nov 14 2016 16:08:53
IMDb member since July 2003

...Your horse is seeming pretty high there...

...If you're trying to shore up this idea of the dirt on the car meaning something, it should be really really easy to tell if you're right (even though it could simply have been a continuity flaw). There are a minimum of three shots of Issa's car from the previous episode to the shot where you saw the dirt...


I recall when I used to debate & expound at length regarding my theories here on IMDb.

I would painstakenly check my punctuation, grammar & facts, trying to avoid harrassment by the nit picky police (not at all saying you're one, just that they exist & are annoying!)

Then, I discovered that IMDb, using some unknown & indecipherable algorithm, would DELETE what I sometimes thought was my best work.

Subsequently, I've kind of arrived at a place where I just don't really care that much to make any point and I'm definitely NOT trying to convince anyone of anything beyond an observation I may have made.

So, apologies if it seemed I was talking down to you in anyway, that certainly was not my intention.

There just hasn't been any significant rain "here" in more than 2 years. And to your observation & knowledge of local precipitation patterns, I'd like to add the fog that rolls inland from Westchester & Playa del Rey, courtesy the onshore flow, to settle in the low lying areas of Inglewood. I never lived there, but have parked overnight many times visiting with sundry female "friends"

That's neither here nor there. Like I said, just an observation.

I don't need to go back and check the specific scenes you listed, because I quickly notice things that seem out of place. Maybe it's from years of exposure, paying attention to detail as required by my career. Maybe I'm a bit overly nit picky too?

I'm also too old, wise & lazy to be sent on an errand of discovery (without compensation!) seeking proof of something I already know to be true.

I therefore ask you to simply TRUST ME (or check for yourself!) Issa's car in every other scene is PRISTINE. In fact, when her car IS dirty, it's only dirty on the hood and windshield! (optimal camera angle) When she opens the driver side door to exit, the door window and the door itself are also PRISTINE. (probably reinforces your point about seeming missteps in production, unless of course, the pristine door window & door were intended to draw the eye TO the dirty windshield & hood!)

We can debate about WHY (or how) the car became dirty in these specific places, but I only care to submit that it's intentional.

Wasn't this series originally or gleaned from a Youtube series? If true, that SCREAMS low budget, doesn't it?

Again, I think these efforts should be applauded & it makes me desire to see MORE. Not just from Issa, Debbie Allen & Larry Wilmore, but also from the hundreds of other artists out "here" that put in the work, but remain unseen or unknown.

Again, Peace! <-- this 1 word is the most important 1 I've written, I mean it earnestly!



"If people like you don't learn from what happened to people like me..."-Professor Rohl

reply

I almost forgot to mention something in regard to the level of directing detail in the lotion dispenser episode.

When Issa's outside the school, we saw an establishing shot that had a sign that said "Thomas Jefferson Middle School". It was an obviously fake sign for legal reasons, but the level of detail paid attention to on this show is so low that you can clearly see the Inglewood High School sign in the upper left corner of the shot. So if someone can't remember to get rid of the real sign on a school, how are they gonna be talking about putting dirt on a car to sell a metaphor almost no one but you would catch?




My web series:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLece-1eaMHaC3K1xH64WtED1tMTRYWLL7

reply