MovieChat Forums > Dunkirk (2017) Discussion > if it wasent a christopher nolan film ev...

if it wasent a christopher nolan film everyone would have bashed it


this is NOT a good movie at all. there is bearly any dialouge and no actual charecters. this is not a real stroy but more of a history channel documentry. the akward silences. like soldiers who are friends and serve together would be that quiet while staying on a beach for weeks. the charecters dosent even have names. nor any personality. there is less dialouge in this movie then a quiet film. this is a modern quiet film. its terrible and boring. instead of re-creating a real soldiers units who actually talks to each other and share expiriences he choosed this crappy atitude. why? because its less hard to make just visuals rather then an actual story and hes probably so smug because he knows people worship him so he can make bad movies and get away with it. this is nolan.

this movie is garbage. this is the truth

reply

Agreed. At the end of the day, this is Nolan trying to insert art and poetry into war. There's no grit, horror -
Character development is minimal - dialogue is bad, realism is non-existent.

Still, you have to admit - there are a lot of people out there that really like artsy films.

reply