The mustache is not important
Can't understand why or how Paramount forced Warner Bros to keep Henry Cavill mustache
shareCan't understand why or how Paramount forced Warner Bros to keep Henry Cavill mustache
shareDefinitely not. Had to be a feud between producers or some other type bad blood. I don't disagree with it. I wouldn't want some other film production that couldn't get its head out of its ass messing up my movie shoot.
shareit looks cool, WB ordered late reshoots, that's not Paramount's problem
shareImportant enough not to interrupt a Tom Cruise Mission Impossible movie...
Superman could have just grown a tash... they were reshooting it anyway, why not reshoot all his scenes.... Ridley Scott replaced Kevin Spacey with Christopher Plummer in 10 days for a two and a half hour movie...
I think people's concerns re': super-'tash were misplaced...
Absolutely correct. He could have just emerged from the coffin with a full grown beard and it would not have made a jolt of difference to the cr@ppy movie anyway.
shareMovie with stache: 7,5/10
movie without: 5/10
it was essential