Just a few random thoughts and questions
I liked this movie. It was fast-paced and interesting and well-acted etc. No major plot-problems. I don't have any major problems with the overall movie, but here are a few things that seemed a bit odd.
1. I Those masks used in the bank robbery were pretty good. Are masks that good readily available? Seems like they should have kept them, both because the masks are just good, and also for evidence reasons (e.g. likely some hairs in there). Also the masks were right beside that door knob he opened; easy fingerprints.
2. They took a little time in the alley to change clothes. Then they had some time in the car. Much of the robbery was well-planned. Seems odd they would not have looked for a dye-pack. Very easy. If Connie knew how much to ask for, then seems he would have thought about dye-pack.
3. Would the cop have really stopped the two guys walking down the street? Neither their clothes nor their race matched the bank-robbers. Two dudes walking down a street would not seem too odd.Are they gonna stop every pair of dudes in the 5 block radius?
4. It seems that Connie would have known it was risky to take Nick on the heist. It was Nick's panicking that really caused the problems. Connie would have known Nick's limitations, and it seems odd for him to put Nick in that situation.
5. Similarly, knowing Nick's problems, why would Connie not just let Nick finish his therapy session? That therapist seemed perfectly suited for Nick. What's the rush?
6. Those risque things in the amusement park couldn't really exist, right? They were beyond PG-13. What's up with that? Is it like an adults-only ride?
7. Assuming the security guard called the cops, then why in heck enter the fun-house in the dark to pursue two people with unknown motives who could be armed? The cops would arrive at any minute. (Would that place really have a night watchman anyway?)
8. For Connie to assume the role of the security guard seems highly risky. Easier to just climb back over the fence. There are a thousand ways that plan could have gone wrong (e.g. cop says show me your ID; copy says "where are the keys to the shed"; cop says "rewind this video").
9. What was the plan to get Nick away from the hospital? Taking the bus seems like it was a random decision, not a plan; and a very bad idea at that. Did he not have car? And where was he going to take Nick? Connie might be no genius, but there's no indication that he's a complete idiot. He had good masks, change of clothes, and a getaway driver for the heist. So why not a minimally logical plan to get Nick out?
10. Is a bottle of acid really worth $15K (wholesale)? If so, then why waste half the bottle ($7,500) on the unconscious guard just to keep him from talking. Again, much easier to run with $15K in acid than losing half of it and staying around to talk with cops. (And would the guard really swallow the acid in the unconscious state? Maybe a bit...?) Or just tell the cops that it was a false alarm and the cops never see the real guard.
11. How did the cops know to go to the guard's apartment to find Connie? Did they trace that cell phone? Seems like a lot of pieces to put together (being that it was not even his cell phone). If they weren't there to get Connie, then he could have just walked away. If Nick does not blab, it's not clear that they can convict Connie of anything.
12. I'm not sure why Ray was so scared. I don't see that the cops could have pinned anything on him. Some other dude robbed a Radio Shack. They can't pin that on Ray, nor really the drug-dealing. So not really sure why he thought he was in trouble. It's not a violation of parole to jump out of a moving cab.
13. Speaking of the cab, is there a problem with a passenger to say that he will get the money for the fare at his destination? It's not like they have to pay up front anyway. What would happen if a cabbie drove a passenger to the police station and said "this guy has no money"? Seems like a waste of time.
Notwithstanding, a good movie!