Was this written before kurt recanted all that he had written for the sake of Christian 'attitude adjustment'?
That was your doing because you wanted to make sure no one thought you watch kinky flicks.
No, I just thought it was practical to cut 'n' paste to match yours each time. After all, I would not want you to make wild and inaccurate claims about 'having no answer' would I? And I can only repeat that your obsession in finding 'kinky flicks' everywhere is apparently your own, reveals your own weakness in film appreciation, and had no relation to the fact I still don't want to watch modern day sagas aimed at the teenage market. But I am sure you have your tickets booked already to see
Passengers? lol...
Your evasiveness tactics don't work with me.
You mean like when I answer point for point while still not having a reply attempting to refute the prospective proofs for the non-existence of God you asked for recently? I see.
'College Girls' film was reviewed by one member as "softcore" pornography".
I am sure that is correct. But it is not a film I have reviewed or even watched, and I have just checked again.. The film does not feature in my old deleted reviews, of which there are 3. If you say I have, then by all means offer substantiation - or admit this is just wrong. Otherwise it becomes boring. But such a movie sure seems to be of interest to you as you returning to it. But in any case, just because you have moral disapproval of the subject of a film - to which naturally you are entitled - does not mean it is not necessarily worthwhile, or a bad film. It just mean kurt doesn't like it (or the sound of it, since it doesn't seem you have even watched most of that which you jump to condemn).
IMDb recommended that if you like that film, or related films by the director, check out 'Women in Prison' softcore flicks. You were attempting to convince readers on GND2 that you're above all that.
No; I have never argued this, and further, don't see how this is relevant to not liking modern teenage saga films. AMOF I rather enjoy such better films of the genre such as
The Big Bird Cage ,
Caged Heat, or the earlier examples
Caged (1950),or Women's Prison (1955) etc. You really need to broaden your horizons and chill a little over low budget exploitation cinema. I know what I would rather watch again over the tedious and pompous proselytizing of GND.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
being paid to review a film does not mean one has an abiding interest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're really that hard up for money, send me your post box mailing number and zip code and I'll send you $20 so you can get a Christmas meal. Geez Film...
Thanks for the offer - but I will stick to writing about movies when asked, as I enjoy the process. But at least you now grudgingly acknowledge that such things as professional reviewing jobs happen. In connection with this I would suggest that an abidingly proscriptive and provincial approach to world cinema and genre by one means rarely being asked for that work, so no need to worry.
I included examples of films on your list that were designed for teens and plenty more from past decades that I didn't even mention.
As I noted, I have haven't ever said that I have
never watched or reviewed such films. However, as others have observed your idea of 'films for teenagers', let alone those specifically aimed at the female - which is still the issue here - is conveniently skewed and stretched. It is doubtful that many if any of those you claim to discover are really what most would reasonable see as films made for a such a specific audience. And you still seem to be trying to disprove something I have never said.
The other question is this, if you recommend films for teenagers as a worthwhile field of viewing then why do you condemn such films en masse when apparently seen on my viewing list? You need to be at least consistent.
Tell me what you thought of the award winning, highly acclaimed film, "Last Tango in Paris" by acclaimed director Bernardo Bertolucci, and how would you rate it. Or just tell me if you thought it was good.
kurt! I would never watch such an appalling work of depraved filth! I am shocked you might have!
I already knew from last year that you thought Twilight and Stewart were a **yawn.
Finally. QED.
And you revealed that the only reason you chimed in was to defend cosmo's virtue.
Actually, to express my disgust at a paedophiliac smear which you later compounded by associating it with homosexuality.
The only problem is that you and cosmo have no interactive relationship. When you two came to this board, you got into an exchange with cosmo, decided you no longer wanted to chat with him, and turned your back on the guy long ago. If I were cosmo I'd send you a PM and say: 'I can take care of myself. Big, bad Kurt doesn't scare me.' The word we're looking for here to describe your chivalry is, 'disingenuous'.
Never the less one can express concern at an appalling implication at which you ought to be ashamed, and which I see today, still lingers on. But I guess that is what being religious is all about.
Did you want me to post on all four of your locations or just two locations, GND & GND2?
Knock yourself out lol, but persistent and aggressive cyber stalking is not very flattering. And you know I will normally reply and you will only be embarrassed again.
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
reply
share