This is a very well done series and it definitely keeps your interest. It's along the lines of Broadchurch, but not that good. Without giving away any plot points, be prepared for TONS of red herrings. In a sense, there are a lot of people in the town who are culpable in one way or another for the events, but the ultimate question will not be answered until about the last 10 minutes of the final episode. I think there are some obvious plot holes with the final resolution, but unlike American shows, European shows don't spoon feed you all the answers. You have to think a bit.
Spoiler alert. How about the fact that the killer's fingerprints would have been all over the cabin were Driss was killed. That seemed like an obvious point of investigation once the police realized the significance of the cabin.
Oh I see since the killer didn't plan it and wasn't in the frame of mind to wipe everything down. I was waiting for more explanation on the person who was taking the pictures of Zoe. I didn't think it fitted the character to do that(without more explanation) and then leave them on the floor. Did I miss something there?
It was yet another of the many red herrings in this series. Agreed that there could have been more explanation as to why he was taking those pictures of her. It seems like a lot of people in the town were obsessed with Zoe, including the inspector's own daughter. I can't understand why, cuz she was kind of trashy bad news.
It seemed more people were obsessed with Driss. As the series was developing I kept thinking "How did he keep getting tangled with everyone, and outside of his social group?" Maybe if I ever watch it again I would catch on the many red herrings. Otherwise I still think the series was done very well. I never really lost interest and it seemed unique. Most of my favorite movies and series have surreal elements so the dream sequences and other minor elements piqued that interest.
Drummer was a lonely, sad guy living with his ultra-needy mom. He became obsessed with the hot young daughter of the mayor and did the birdwatcher-y thing of taking pictures of her from afar. He was too ashamed of his obsession to mention it, because overall he was still a good guy and he knew it was wrong. I thought it made some sense.
Drummer didn't leave the photos of Zoe on the floor. Peeters knocked the box from the closet shelf by accident when searching for shoes that matched the pattern. It was a convenient way to cast suspicion on Drummer, although I agree that the obsession was unlikely.
One of the show's main strengths was that characters were all flawed. They behaved as lead characters of their lives, rather than props for a murder mystery. I was thoroughly engaged for all ten episodes, although the conclusion was problematic. Ines could not have known that Lucien would arrive to find Driss' body, panic, clean the crime scene and take the body to the river. That she kept the boots and necklace is simply unbelieveable.
It was unrealistic that she would have wanted to make a life with Driss, let alone react violently to his not reciprocating her feelings. Act of passion, so I'll suspend disbelief. Yet her murder of Drummer was cold and calculated. This I don't buy. That said, the series is quite engaging and well done.
I agree. All the stuff that you mentioned under the spoiler tags (and thanks for doing so) struck me in the same way. I don't know what the writers were playing at here, but to me the denouement was a complete failure of common sense.
If the opposite of Love is indifference, what's the opposite of Hate?
I agree with everything you said. The series has its flaws for sure but I was on the edge of my seat for the last 3 episodes. I wish they had tacked on a few extra minutes of the finale to explain how Ines knew Drummer was going to be at the cabin. That's the only part that bugged me. Her not cleaning up didn't bother me too much because she was clearly drunk and having some sort of emotional break down, so she most likely wasn't thinking rationally. Maybe she was going to go back the next day and clean up, but by the time she got there Lucien had already been there, so she thought she was in the clear? I don't know. Her killing Drummer doesn't seem that out of character. Maybe she was already at the cabin for whatever reason and panicked when he showed up. This chick clearly had some emotional issues and never seemed to show any remorse for killing Driss, so the fact that she killed a cop that was on to her doesn't surprise me too much. Like I said, a few extra minutes would have made a big difference, but all in all what was important is that she was caught, so it doesn't dent my enjoyment of the show in the least bit. It was still phenomenally done. I never would have guessed in the first episode that Drummer was going to end up dead. I really liked him and it's sad he went out like that.
But by then the fingerprints most likely would have been unusable. Between Ines being there and the cops being called Lucien already had cleaned up. Fingerprints aren't like blood which can be located with a black light. Besides in real life a lot of times fingerprints are unusable. They might have checked for them off screen. I don't really consider that a plot hole, but more of sloppy writing maybe.
She went there, because she thought she'd catch him with Zoe. She said so in these epic last 10 minutes of the finale.
As for Drummer's murder, my guess is that her assistant (the disabled guy) knew about Driss's murder. The guy was also painting the cabin and I guess he told Ines that Drummer was there to reveal the truth to Peeters. But that's just a theory - they could have given a certain explanation!