Hannah...is she...

i don't think so. Someone said she was barons chld who was thought to have died when tossed into lake as fetus. Guess he picked her up later. Tho didn't he get hanged. and timeline doesnt seem to add up. It happened 200 years ago. and movie was present time. He could have lived that long without ageing with that serum, but she should still age. Maybe she was his grandtougher or something. Anyways too many questions indeed

She is the same girl, yes. The serum gives them both long lives. She seems to age very, very slowly, having been an infant two hundred years ago. The baron wasn't hanged, but burned along with his wife. He survived. That's why he had all those fake faces, why his real face looked like that at the end. I wonder if she'll age normally now that she won't be taking the serum anymore?

You're right, there are a lot of questions, because the movie hopes you won't notice. But it's basically what the other posters in this thread said.

PS: I think we should really start talking and creating discussions on this board so it can take shape into a nice resource like the imdb boards were. Unfortunately, I started posting with this movie, which doesn't really inspire a positive discourse. But, whether negative or positive, a discussion is a discussion, I guess.

She ages super slowly like Wolverine.

That's what I understood, it was the girl from the picture that was aging very slowly due to the syrup. It was mentioned about the eels that they could live longer in that area. In the movie the eels were forced into human bodies by doctors, then through a machine the syrup was collected. I thought this was the creepiest part of the movie :)

I think that the girl in the picture was of her mother. She just looked a lot like her and this showed that she was their daughter. The picture looked very old, and the woman in the picture was wearing the locket which we know he only gave to Hannah near the end of the movie.