'I'm catholic'


Hypocritical much, April?

How can she use her religion as a reason not to get an abortion when the child probably won't survive but yet has zero issues with having sex and living with someone before marriage.

Can't use it as a reason for 1 thing but not another.

reply

C'mon don't you know, religious folk no matter the persuasion pick and choose which rules they want to follow. And many have the gall to want to impose rules on others.

I don't trust people who don't like pets and I don't trust people who pets don't like.

reply

I know April is conflicted over the pregnancy and possibly being forced to choose between her life or the baby which is a tough one.

reply

C'mon don't you know, religious folk no matter the persuasion pick and choose which rules they want to follow. And many have the gall to want to impose rules on others.




It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

reply

How can she use her religion as a reason not to get an abortion when the child probably won't survive but yet has zero issues with having sex and living with someone before marriage.



Sex is part of human nature, abortion isn't.

reply


Sex is part of human nature, abortion isn't.


Oooh, another good answer!

It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

reply

Silly you. Didn't you know Christians are hypocritical as *beep* and take it upon themselves to decide which rules they decide to follow?

The bigger problem I found with that conversation was the guy having zero say, even though there's a chance for brain damage in the child.

"Baby, we should think about abortion, there's a chance the baby will have birth defects"

"Nope, you have no say"

The excuse she gave was just laughable.

C'mon don't you know, religious folk no matter the persuasion pick and choose which rules they want to follow.


Gah I should read the replies before typing. Someone beat me to it :P

reply

[deleted]

Incidentally, I am Catholic. I do not impose my decision or views on anyone. The problem with sweeping generalizations is that most of the time they are wrong.

Often, so too are leaps onto soapboxes.

Perhaps you should go back an reread what was actually written and not what you you wanted to read. I specifically used the word "many" and not "all" nor even "most."

My generalization was intentionally NOT so sweeping.

I don't trust people who don't like pets and I don't trust people who pets don't like.

reply

We can't have it both ways. We've said my body - I make the decision, and most (if not all) the times it's left to the woman to make that decision.


If that's the case then men should be allowed to 'abort' all financial responsibility to a child they do not want. That goes double if you can find out early on it'll be born with defects.

reply

The whole story arch is annoying.

She's a *beep* nurse in the ER. Let's force this baby to term, when it might not even have a functioning brain. Oh and be born with TB.

Seriously this is so weak.

What do you think the odds are she's going to miscarry?

reply

Hypocritical much, April?

How can she use her religion as a reason not to get an abortion when the child probably won't survive but yet has zero issues with having sex and living with someone before marriage.

Can't use it as a reason for 1 thing but not another.


Comparing premarital sex to killing your unborn child isn't even talking apples & oranges, it's talking apples & aardvarks. I can't believe you would make such an asinine statement. There have been many cases where the doctor recommends termination but the baby turns out to be healthy & happy - they wanted to kill that baby but the mother refused. And if it's the mother's Catholic faith that saves that baby's life, then so be it.

reply

Well, didn't take long for one of the bible thumpers to show up.

Right now she's not "killing her unborn child" - she's legally terminating a pregnancy. And not that she would need a reason, but she does have a few rather important medical ones: a) if the child survives, it might have TB and/or a brain defect, b) she and the child might die.

Stop with the baby-killing doctors nonsense, and the but everything will turn out right if you just trust in a higher being BS. Making responsible decisions based on (medical) facts makes for a saner/safer world. Not that you lot would know or care.

reply

Well, didn't take long for one of the bible thumpers to show up.

Right now she's not "killing her unborn child" - she's legally terminating a pregnancy. And not that she would need a reason, but she does have a few rather important medical ones: a) if the child survives, it might have TB and/or a brain defect, b) she and the child might die.


I am a Christian but I'm not a Bible thumper. I can just see April's side in this. In April's mind, that is her unborn child, it isn't "just a fetus" to her. I was a little surprised that she wouldn't even discuss the options with her fiancee, even if it's just to explain to him why it's so important for her to take a chance on this pregnancy because as the doctor said, the child could be fine, it's not a foregone conclusion that the baby will have problems, etc. It is her body and if she chooses to take the risk & put her own life in danger to carry that pregnancy to term, that is her choice. All you pro-abortion (notice I didn't say pro choice) love to say "it's a woman's body so it's her right to choose," when they choose to get an abortion but when a woman chooses to have the baby despite the risk, then she's not supposed to have that choice. I could get into a discussion about how that baby could be born & if it's not well enough to sustain life on it's own due to a particular defect but it's other organs are healthy, etc, that baby could actually save the lives of other babies through organ donation but you wouldn't want to hear about any of that. You just want to push abortion onto women who don't feel like "terminating" their unborn babies.

reply

I agree with you, but you will be (and have been) attacked for saying an abortion is killing a baby (which it is). I think there are more people these days who do not see abortion as killing. Maybe it helps them sleep better at night.

However, I too think she is being a hypocrite. Sin is sin, whether it is sex outside of marriage or killing a baby. The writers would have been better off to just let her say no to abortion because she believes it's killing a baby. Religion should not have been introduced.

reply

This is pretty standard for most religious people regardless of their faith. The followers of one particular religion will make the girls have a medical procedure to "restore their virginity" so they can marry them off without bringing shame to the family.

And no, they aren't Christians.

Bear in mind that SJW's have their own set of hypocrisies and double standards so it's not just related to religious folk.


Sometimes a movie or tv show plot is so stupid that only the stupid can understand it.

reply