I've just watched episode 4 of season 2 and i gotta say, i find myself agreeing with most of what they say. Their actions are extreme but their reasons are understandable.
Also its so obvious the shrink is the mole, he might as well be wearing a sign round his neck. Hint- every time a British guy is in an American film or tv show, 99% of the time, they turn out to be the bad one.
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the reaction that Gero and Co were going for, so that we would question whether or not Jane would re-join Sandstorm and her brother.
By this time, I am not on any side, but the side of each person's own moral compass, and the sense of right and wrong. Neither Shepherd nor the FBI guy (who wanted to ship Roman to the CIA) came out looking good on this episode. Yet there are people on both sides who seem morally conflicted and grey and interesting. Like Dr. Borden, who couldn't kill Patterson. Perhaps that is what the show is trying to say: instead of blindly following any group, follow one's own sense of right.
I agree: neither side is looking very good right now. Also, I like the idea of looking at each person's moral compass.
That's why I like Jane. She keeps throwing herself between pretty much anyone and danger. She cares about the team (even after they all turned against her) and especially looks out for kids and innocent bystanders.
Roman is also interesting, since he was a scumbag before the memory wipe, but after it, his first action (as a confused amnesiac) was to tell the waitress to get her kid and get out before a fight happened.
I've just watched episode 4 of season 2 and i gotta say, i find myself agreeing with most of what they say. Their actions are extreme but their reasons are understandable.
To misquote I don't know who: "What you do speaks so loudly, that I can't hear what you say to the contrary."
“Not to be hyperbolic, but humans are a decade away from fighting apes on horseback.”Mod. Fam. reply share