...probably not. I know he has no problem doing it (he did nude modeling before) but full frontal male nudity almost always will get a film an NC-17. But who knows? He's a handsome guy with a great body so they might let it pass.
sharefull frontal male nudity almost always will get a film an NC-17
Who cares? There's a picture of his dong on the internet, and you can see it without having to listen to him talk.
shareI know both Jamie and the Producer said in interviews, 50 Shades of Grey was always going to be rated R...NC17 is too difficult to get into certain movie theaters...they wanted to reach a broad audience..so I would assume the same R rating for the last two movies..
And I thought I read that Jamie signed a no frontal nudity clause?
For the millionth time guys,Penis does not mean NC-17
And I thought I read that Jamie signed a no frontal nudity clause?
No, they usually leave majority of the nudity to women. It's a double standard.
But how do you go into a film like this and not want to do full-frontal?
The scene in Forgetting Sarah Marshall was a big deal when it came out.
Not really accurate at all. I can name like 10 movies in the last few years that have graphic genital male nudity. I can't think of one female example in a mainstream movie.
shareDakota in FSOG!
shareUmmm I would sooner categorize that fake pubic hair covering a bikini bottom. You don't see anything. With men it's typically close up and dragged out for gross out gags but still not the same.
shareNope there is a close up shot of her getting whipped down there and she is waxed!
shareAgain it's from the side. You don't see any part of the genital area. Contrast that to every r rated comedy where you get a close up dong and balls scene without fail.
shareShe exposes her Mons Pubis which is female genitalia and before you start no it is not classified as genitalia on men!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4465564/board/thread/261710929?p=1
Got into a very long discussion with 3 of your Free the Vulva buddies before Xmas and not one of them could prove otherwise, one of them turned out to be homophobic calling me a "Fruity Gay Man", FYI I'm a straight woman and one of them reported my posts so they would get deleted CookieMonster didn't like i was proving him wrong so i've no intention to start another long ass post!
I don't have any buddies or any clue what you are talking about. You can find any links or stupid rationale you want, what you are describing is nothing like the graphic close up testicle and penis scenes in movies. Any idiot can see that.
Honestly, I'd rather not see either person's junk on the big screen when I am eventually forced to watch this.
Honestly, I'd rather not see either person's junk on the big screen when I am eventually forced to watch this.
Lol don't be upset because you are proven wrong!
Even if I give you your silly idea of a lower abdomen of a woman is equal to fully exposed male genitals. That is but one example where there are tons of male examples. And that was my only point in the beginning that the statement of there is only female nudity is inaccurate.
Now, it seems you are very insecure with female nudity. Sorry about that. And you should possibly look into a thing called Google if you need to see some male genitals, it would surely be a lot quicker than waiting for this movie.
Oh believe me i Googled, male and female genitalia, and your fellow believers did as well and they couldn't disprove what i was saying, that Dakota showed her Mons Pubis and that was genitalia!
shareThat is completely irrelevant to what I was responding to.
There is much more male nudity in today's movies than female. No big deal, just a fact. Not sure why you are so defensive about it.
There is much more male nudity in today's movies than female.
Completely agree!
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
[deleted]
And rightfully so!
Dear Jamie,
Why the hell would you sign up for a porno if you didn't want to show your dick? It's not like we haven't seen it before. ;)
I think you have your certs all wrong. Its now normal in US comedy's and films for there to be male genital nudity and no female nudity. It gets a R/18 or even Cert 15
There is no full female nudity in mainstream US films and TV what so ever , that tends to get an NC17.
It's one of the biggest double standards in Hollywood.
So when you ask if he is going to show his penis, ask whether she is going to show her labia?
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
A woman being completely nude IS considered full frontal nudity here. Labia shots are only for porn not mainstream films. There is still not a lot of male nudity in most films. There was no full frontal in the first film on him--only her.
shareOh dear you are wrong!
Google Rosario Dawson in Trance , Vulva on display cert R / 18 normal nudity not porn.
Showing a labia is not porn, it is part of the vulva and is completely natural. Even with a full mould of pubic hair it is sometimes visable It is just nudity not porn! Penis = Vulva its as simple as that.
As Mya Rose above will tell you , she only showed her Mons Pubis in the first film, which is normally shown if a string bikini is worn. Her also showed his mons pubis and the beginning of his penile shaft.
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
As Mya Rose above will tell you , she only showed her Mons Pubis in the first film, which is normally shown if a string bikini is worn. Her also showed his mons pubis and the beginning of his penile shaft.
Mon Pubis which is the entrance of her VulvaLOL!
Yes, i know being a virgin all this is new to you, but if you don't pay attention you'll learn nothing!
Structures of the Vulva
The vulva is comprised of many different anatomical structures, the most important of which are mentioned below:
Mons pubis: A fat pad at the anterior of the vulva, which is covered in pubic hair.
http://teachmeanatomy.info/pelvis/female-reproductive-tract/the-vulva/
Yes so as Dorman showned his penile shaft you saw his genitals!
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
Yes so as Dorman showned his penile shaft you saw his genitals!
Dakota has no problem with nudity
That was explicit sex scenes not explicit nudity, the CGI was to apply pubes to Dakota she is shown waxed later on
shareNo it wasn't, how could it be about sex scenes, it was about nudity, that's why you only saw her mons pubis, rather than anymore of her genitalia.
She also wore a modesty patch that wrapped her lower vulva right under her, this doesn't strike me as a person with no problem about nudity!
Quote from production team......
Dakota [Johnson] had kind of a patch that went over her pubic area, and right round her whole body. We were in the curious situation, in post-production, of adding [pubic hair]. I wouldn’t say it was one of the highlights of my career, but it certainly was one of the most surreal scenarios.
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
No it wasn't, how could it be about sex scenes, it was about nudity, that's why you only saw her mons pubis, rather than anymore of her genitalia.
She also wore a modesty patch that wrapped her lower vulva right under her, this doesn't strike me as a person with no problem about nudity!
Quote from production team......
Dakota [Johnson] had kind of a patch that went over her pubic area, and right round her whole body. We were in the curious situation, in post-production, of adding [pubic hair]. I wouldn’t say it was one of the highlights of my career, but it certainly was one of the most surreal scenarios.
That was for the pubes for her first time with Grey, since then she WAXED!!!!
Yes, i know being a virgin all this is new to you, but if you don't pay attention you'll learn nothing!
You've always been dodgy with your info Cookie!!
I am afraid you are just wrong, if it were just for pubes, why do they specifically say it goes right round her whole body?
When she is waxed later in the film , why can't you see her labia and clitoral hood if it was natural they were after.
There is nothing anywhere or by anyone to suggest that she was not wearing the patch for the complete film.
It must be this post truth world or something but you are very ready to give abuse without fact or evidence
If you look at my posts all have been polite.
Cause of the angle, you can see her Mons Pubis, why should she show more than Jamie?
Well then Jamie wore a cover for the complete film too and his parts are CGI!
There is never any need to become abusive in an equalist world
Yes, i know being a virgin all this is new to you, but if you don't pay attention you'll learn nothing!
On face value he showed more as its a penile shaft , whether its a CGI or someone elses, who knows apart from the Editor and Director
Post truth again I'm afraid ......
Read what I said
There is no information anywhere on whether they are CGI , someone elses or hisOR HIS
On Come on,I wasn't born yesterday!
"Post edited" LOL!
I literally cut and pasted your quote in my post, you may go back and try to change your mistake but i have what you orinally said in my post.
Anywway. lovely that it has been again, its time to stop posting as the point is made for others to see the truth, thats really all I am after.
Post truth again
"Post edited" LOL!
Post Edited: Thu Jan 12 2017 02:01:19
It's not his though because he revealed in an interview that there were strict contracts in place thst he wouldn't have to reveal his Weiner so more likely double or CGI! Dakota showed more, FACT!
shareIt's not his though because he revealed in an interview that there were strict contracts in place thst he wouldn't have to reveal his Weiner so more likely double or CGI! Dakota showed more
No that's not true not by a long shot!
shareWell I never saw "Trance" so I can't say but my point remains--there is more female nudity (vulva or not) than male nudity in US films. Dornan only showed his butt in the first film while she was totally nude.
shareDorman showned the base of his penile shaft which according to Mya Rose's logic above means that you saw his genitals.
Johnson showed her mons pubis which is part of her genitals but basically is like saying the above!
Here is a swimsuit model on the front cover of a magazine showing her Mons Pubis
http://images.medicaldaily.com/sites/medicaldaily.com/files/styles/full_breakpoints_theme_medicaldaily_desktop_1x/public/2015/02/18/hannah-davis-si-swimsuit-edition-2015-cover.jpg
Rosario in Trance for your information Cert R - http://imgur.com/r/all/v7Z2M4e
People are so use to seeing male nudity now that it is ignored unless genitals are seen. There is more male skin on show in films FACT!
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
Labia isn't only for porn, plenty of movies with labia...
shareAre you trolling?
Hall pass and Spy are R both have erect penis and zoomed in for 5 mins .
No Women groups would tolerate this if it were vulva .
Hostel 3 has a penis cut off and fed to dogs. Again no outrage because its not a Vagina being mutilated.
I don't remember a penis being in Spy...
There was no outrage about Hostel 3 because the movie was terrible and not many people saw it.
Information about various versions of Spy here http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=92970 - All versions have an erect penis
There was no outrage about Hostel 3 because the movie was terrible and not many people saw it.
Looks like it's a no go, sorry ladies!
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/jamie-dornan-won-full-frontal-nudity-fifty-shades-sequel-article-1.2945906
Doesn't bother me...
shareWell, Dakota won't either, I'm sure she will have her wrap round patch on again!
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
Well, Dakota won't either, I'm sure she will have her wrap round patch on again!
[deleted]
The dark ages were women being seen as unequal to men, they were just seen as sexual objects, actresses in movies being tormented, abused and sometimes raped by big fat cats behind the scenes. Thandie Newton talked about how she had to strip off for an auditions and the producer would then show his friends the tape at parties, Adrian Lyne admitted to tormenting Kim Baseinger during filming of 9 1/2 weeks, Maria Schneider who was 19 at the time of filming Last Tango in Paris described Bertolucci as “very manipulative” and that she “felt a little raped, both by Marlon and by Bertolucci. The two leading ladies of "Blue is the warmest colour" said the director made them feel like prostitutes!
Jamie could be full frontal and erect and he will still never be equal to the crap that women actresses have to endure so you and your anti merkin friends can jog on for all i care!
This is not a problem for just the women. Corey Feldman didn't become this messed up do to an overworked acting schedule. Although I do believe women are victimized more, male actors are preyed on just the same. We live in sexually high tolerance times among the wealthy and elite. Male actors, too, have been on the other end <---pun alert<---- of unwanted sexual advances in order to secure a role. The difference is, not too many men would admit they've been in that situation. The worst is the pedophilia in Hollywood, and hell, all over the world. Crazy, crazy times we live in.
~Keep some room in your heart for the unimaginable~
And as we found out last summer, a man doing those things..(Trump)..is just kind of poo pooed., or "locker room talk" I was very surprised there wasn't more flack about that....but I will say there were at least 3 lawsuits from women against the Fox News Corp..and they won...and Bill Cosby will probably die in jail...and Penn State had their debacle also..
shareJamie has no issues with nude scenes. He has a healthy body image and if the part calls for it like it did in "The Fall," he'll do it same like here. But we never see him, we see her waist up or buttocks of both. We, in the USA, are prudish when it comes to body exposure in films, but not graphic VIOLENCE.
GFW
Surprise surprise its like the last film .... no one goes full frontal.
This from the Canadian Board of Censors ....
Frequent use of the sexual expletive, some in a sexual context; infrequent use of scatological slang, cursing, profanity, and vulgar expressions
Frequent portrayals of sexual activity, some in a BDSM context – breast and buttock nudity, some detail
Infrequent breast and buttock nudity in a non-sexual context
ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.
Dakota still displays more nudity than Jamie!
shareDakota still displays more nudity than Jamie!
Her:breasts, bum, sneak peak at something!
Him: Bum, sneak peek at something!
3-2 to Dakota!
He doesn't show his breasts? Really? I thought we saw him shirtless too. Or do you not count that as "showing" for a male and in that case, do men have to grow out a new body part? How stupid you are.
shareHe doesn't show his breasts? Really? I thought we saw him shirtless too. Or do you not count that as "showing" for a male and in that case, do men have to grow out a new body part? How stupid you are.
It's not a big deal for women to be shirtless either. I live in the US and it's legal for women in many places to be topless in public - in New York, it's been legal for women to be topless in public since 1992! Where do you live, in the Taliban ruled middle east where women have to cover from head to toe?
And did you stop and think about why topless women count as "nude" to certain people in the first place? It's because of the fear of vaginas!
Its men like you why women don't want to go topless for fear of attack, we sadly live in the era of where society teaches "Don't Get Raped" rather than "Don't Rape". Its really sad i have to explain that to you while you're constantly shouting about your disappointment about the lack of vaginas on display!
shareRape is an act of violence, not sex. Men looking at nude women don't all of a sudden rape. That's stupid. Stop coming up with excuses just because vaginas scare you and you don't want them shown in films.
shareRape is an act of violence, not sex
Men looking at nude women don't all of a sudden rape
Stop coming up with excuses just because vaginas scare you and you don't want them shown in films.
That didn't say that rape is an act of sex. It's saying sexual intercourse but that doesn't mean it's not a violent act. Explain this: well over 90% of rape, the man never reaches orgasm, yet during sex where it is consensual, over 90% of men do orgasm. How could that be if they are one in the same?
And thanks for that interesting international vagina diagram. Now point to one Hollywood film where they show something like that. Did we see that in 50 shades? Nope! Even if those vaginas weren't actual photographs of real vaginas, but instead drawings, Hollyweird would still refuse to put them in films. Vaginaphobia alive and well.
seriuously, trying to school me on what is rape when you're a sexiest homophobe!
No vaginaphobia here, but massive dickphobia, you being one of the biggest!
I'm not schooling anyone, I'm giving you facts. You feel that men rape because they see women nude. THAT is sexist and downright stupid.
And don't use the word dick with vagina. One is slang, the other is not. If you use dick, then use pussy. If you can't use pussy for whatever reason, use penis instead of dick. When people foolishly use vagina with dick, that gives the false impression that vagina is a dirty slang term even though it isn't - that's why stupid pet names like vajayjay are coined.
I'm not schooling anyone, I'm giving you facts. You feel that men rape because they see women nude. THAT is sexist and downright stupid.
Jezebel? Really? They are a PC liberal SJW site that spreads fake news like the phony Rolling Stones rape article which turned out to be false.
You are the type that would say a woman wearing something scantily clad is asking to be raped. How dumb. And you're the type that is a massive pussy for fearing the pussy - which is why you want a woman's mons pubis to count as full frontal. bahahaha.
You are the type that would say a woman wearing something scantily clad is asking to be raped.
Men's chest isn't sexualized? Really?
And I totally agree that it is wrong to tell a woman not to get raped instead of telling men not to rape. But the reason people think like that is because they falsely believe rape is sex rather than violence. Men who rape aren't doing that because they need sex. They do that because of their hatred of women and wanting a sense of power over them. It has nothing to do with sex, otherwise every man would be a rapist (what man hasn't seen a naked woman?).
Let's also not falsely claim that women are showing more in films than men. You said it yourself, you are COUNTING more parts on a woman as nude, that's why you THINK women show more. If vaginas were shown the way in that vagina collage you linked to, every male would be ok with penises being shown too. Heck if vaginas were shown like in that photo, go ahead and show fully erect penises in films and men wouldn't mind. This is all about equality here. Come on, a woman's mons pubis equal to a man's penis? How is that equal? Give me a break.
Men's chest isn't sexualized? Really?
Come on, a woman's mons pubis equal to a man's penis?
Just because a man's chest isn't as sexualized as a woman's chest doesn't mean a man's chest ISN'T sexualized. That's what you had implied, yet now there is a level of sexualization. Arguably, you can claim a woman's butt is more sexualized than a man's butt, but that doesn't mean male and female butts are not equal.
And Jamie did show his pubic region along with the base of his penis in the first film. That is still his penis. Just because you didn't see it from the base to the tip doesn't mean penis wasn't shown at all. No vulva/labia/vagina at all from Dakota.
Surprise surprise its like the last film .... no one goes full frontal.
This from the Canadian Board of Censors ....
Frequent use of the sexual expletive, some in a sexual context; infrequent use of scatological slang, cursing, profanity, and vulgar expressions
Frequent portrayals of sexual activity, some in a BDSM context – breast and buttock nudity, some detail
Infrequent breast and buttock nudity in a non-sexual context