18% Rotten Tomatoes


Ouch!
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fifty_shades_darker/

reply

This movie is getting torn apart. I haven't read one positive review

reply

Even the 'positive' reviews are hardly positive about it.

Basically, they all seem to amount to "It's good, despite being bad at everything."

reply

Now it's at 11%

reply

9% when I just checked.

reply

17%

reply

Lol lol I meant 7%

reply

Its now at 8% LOL!

reply

So you only go to movies when others tell you? Never mind that you might want to see it or have an interest in it. Never mind that you troll these boards. You think small blocks of plastic with voice overs are the bomb. I get you now Mya...I hope you get help...there could be a doctor Flynn for you.

reply

You think small blocks of plastic with voice overs are the bomb.


Again with the Lego diss LOL it really burns you that blocks of plastic are getting way better reviews than Darker!

The boards are closing on a high for me personally, the total annihilation of this movie! So don't worry about me, I'm getting closure, I'm all cured!

reply

People actually thought this movie was going to earn positive reviews?! 

♥♣♦♠

reply

It's basically garbage, just like the first.


Trying to create a channel based on interpreting, reviewing, and even giving you something to laugh about film. Hope you enjoy what you see. Thanks in advance.

Review of the film here-https://youtu.be/J8_Fd_YB_dk

reply

Mya, do you check your PMs? I sent you a message, my dear!

And to your point, I was thinking that this would still probably get a 25 percent score, but who could have imagined an 8%? Even the positive reviewers are saying that it's awful, but it's probably worth checking out if you have the money to waste ("it's so bad that you need to see it to believe it.) I knew it was a disaster when Dakota and Jamie were on the talk shows during the past few weeks. Dakota looked like she didn't even want to talk about the movie, and Jamie was just going through the motions, hoping that he has a good career after this (I think he does).

But in thinking of this movie, I'm kind of remember a review by Roger Ebert where he gave a one-star review to a movie and acknowledged it was terrible, but with a footnote..."It's a god-awful movie, but I suppose that I'm glad I saw it,. just to let you know how bad it was and why you shouldn't waste money to see it."

That was "Crash" by David Cronenberg! I think FSoD is probably on that same level.

When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading!

reply