I actually liked--just liked--the first film and having not read the books, didn't know what to expect but enjoyed it.
And I heard that "everyone" thought book #2 was the best of the three, but have no desire to see this--but curious if you thought book #2 was the best, was this better than the first film?
Yes it was. In serious. I read the whole thing to see what all the hooplah was about and i like the story. I could do without all the sex. Sometimes i had to skip. But this one is definitely the best because anna is not so "yes sir" and there's an actual story. Three goes crazy and all over the place to force them more reason to be together. One is literally him introducing her to everything to figure out what she does and doesnt like and then you ger the second book which is him calming his *beep* and letting them act like a real couple plus like i said actual story.
shareHmm..I don't see Freed like that at all..they are married and trying to figure it all out..Ana has some very trying times, but it all ends well..what more could you want?
shareYou dont see it as crazy? Its interesting, but its crazy. The whole crap with Jack Hyde. Definitely left field. I cant say more without doing spoilers.
So yeah i still stick to this one was the best of the series. And ir had more of a story.
Freed is nuts and mostly takes place after their wedding and trying to wrap the whole thing up aside from the author throwinf in that left field crap to try and add some drama lol