MovieChat Forums > Fifty Shades Darker (2017) Discussion > Does anyone else notice that Portrait-of...

Does anyone else notice that Portrait-of-a-Statue...

posted 8 years ago by !!!deleted!!! (738999)
7 replies | jump to latest

...tries to bring in politics to EVERY discussion on these boards?

Literally, it doesn't matter what anyone says on these boards, she (or it) wants to somehow bring Trump or Hillary into totally irrelevant discussions. It's almost as if that she/it clicked on the politics board but got redirected to this site.

I admit that I've been hard (forgive the pun) on isundling on this board, but at the end of the day, I like her. She likes the movies and the books--I think they're stupid--but she's a good sport, and I think she's probably a great woman and great mother (though I do question why she's such a fan of them when she has a couple of little children that are about ready to start growing up on this garbage).

But at least isundling acknowledges that the movies/books are probably bad but she likes them anyways. I can understand and respect that. Myself--I still love "Congo," even though it was a terrible movie, though the book was good. I also still watch "Hannibal" from time to time even though I know it's bad. We all have our guilty pleasures.

But Portrait-of-a-State brings her/its personal politics to every single message on this board. Everything that comes from her is "Trump this," "Hillary that." Why? Is she/it that bitter because the election is over and she can't handle it?

When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading!

[–] Portrait-of-a-Statue 8 years ago

Can you provide some examples?

Don't tell me you love animals if that's cow muscle on your plate.

[–] !!!deleted!!! (738999) 8 years ago

Feb 6:
"Liars! No particulars in The Sun review and not one single other review online. The Sun totally made up that review.
It's a conservative Murdoch paper and the review follows all the Murdoch talking points, beginning with how decadent Hollywood is."

[By the way, do you now at least concede that this movie is a critical disaster? And maybe the paper got it right?]

That's just from a couple days ago, but do you actually want to bring up your history?

When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading!

[–] Portrait-of-a-Statue 8 years ago

Hmmm. I don't see either "Trump" or "Hillary" there. And that's, what?, 2 dozen or so posts back? That doesn't support your claim that "every single" one of my posts manages to bring up Trump or Hillary.

...do you actually want to bring up your history?

Yes. You will need to if you want to provide evidence for your initial assertion.

Don't tell me you love animals if that's cow muscle on your plate.

[–] !!!deleted!!! (738999) 8 years ago

nd that's, what?, 2 dozen or so posts back?

Well if you post on imdb a thousand times a day like you do, then 2 dozen posts back probably means less than a day.

But since you brought it up, let's go into your history. But before doing that, I respect your blue paw logo--I also work with animal rescue places...I'm not sure if you did this randomly or if you work for them, which I respect if that's the case.

But here's some of your posts:

Feb 8: "AND...the reviewer actually watched the movie, unlike the "reviewer" in Rupert "Fake News" Murdoch's The Sun."

Feb 9: "Boy (and I mean that literally), are you wrong. Fifty Shades Darker gets people laid more. As for Lego Batman, the Big Bang Theory has schooled us well on the type of person who will enjoy that. Knock yourself out."

Feb 11: "And? You're now attacking someone's age? *beep* you. Who have to resort this *beep* low and degrade yourself because opinions exist and they don't see eye-to-eye to yours? Did you really have to pull a Trump and be some disgusting human being who needs to discriminate a person's age? Wow. I know some users love this movie, they like to share their love, but I never read a mean comment from them where they defend their fan base with discrimination. You're tired of the hate too? How ironic that you exemplify more hate than anyone else."

I could go on and on.

These are just your messages from the past week.

And if you want to attack Mya for being 37--as you did and cleverly tried to surreptitiously mask--I have news for you. I'm also 37, and I know that Mya is probably a lot hotter than you.

When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading!

[–] Portrait-of-a-Statue 8 years ago

Portrait-of-a-State brings her/its personal politics to every single message on this board. Everything that comes from her is "Trump this," "Hillary that."

You have provided not a single example of this. Not one.

The Feb 11 post you copied and pasted is not mine.

Please show me where I have attacked MyaRose for being 37.

You are not good at this. Do you really want to continue?

Don't tell me you love animals if that's cow muscle on your plate.

[–] !!!deleted!!! (738999) 8 years ago

You have provided not a single example of this. Not one.

Not one??? Did you just see the examples above? Are you blind? I actually could go further into your postings, but...

Do you want me to start posting screenshots of your messages, before you delete them, as I see that you've done?

IMDB cleverly, by design or maybe something more sinister, has disabled screenshots. To post screenshots of idiot posters, we have to use sites like photobucket and then post the links.

Yes, that message of Mya being 37--the ORIGINAL MESSAGE--my not have been yours, but you made fun of her anyways in an utterly jealous way.

And like I pointed out, Mya is probably way hotter than you. She's a hot Irish babe, and my guess is that you're an overweight mother of 3 kids, divorced, and applying for food stamps.

I hope that I'm wrong, but it's hard to argue with your posting history.

When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading!

[–] Portrait-of-a-Statue 8 years ago

Do you want me to start posting screenshots of your messages...

You do whatever you think you need to do.

Don't tell me you love animals if that's cow muscle on your plate.