4.8 really?


Obviously the people voting this must be into films based on comic book heros or films with loads of CGI or perhaps they didn't like the fact that the subject of what's worse in the Bible - two men who lay together or King David sending his best friend off to war so he could have sex with said friend's wife. lol Duvall needs to send his wife for acting lessons. That the worst thing I can say about this film. Dialogue needed some work as well but certainly I've seen tons of films that were much worse than this one. Certainly better than its 4.8 rating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-09OhQPiIg#t=85

reply

[deleted]

I have to agree about her acting and yeah, there were some issues with the script. It's not perfect but Good Lord, it's better than the rating here. I've seen really bad B films that have higher ratings than this film! lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-09OhQPiIg#t=85

reply

Like the rest of us, you're certainly entitled to your opinion but I gave it a rating of 2...and not for any of the reasons you've stated above. Furthermore, I didn't base my rating of it against any other movie's ratings. It earned my "2" completely on it's own merits...or lack thereof.

reply

I still haven't seen this, but I plan to soon. I'm a fan of Duvall as an actor and I also consider his directorial effort The Apostle to be a masterpiece, so I was a little surprised to see such a low rating.

reply

Robert Duvall is my favorite actor but I did not like The Apostle! I'm always surprised if he's in something that I don't like and that's one of the few. This film is not one of his best but it's definitely better than the rating here implies in my opinion. Yes, the screenplay needed some work and his wife is not the best actor in the world for sure but certainly, for me at least, this film had some fine moments. You'll have to get back to me and let me know what you think of it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-09OhQPiIg#t=85

reply

King David sending his best friend off to war so he could have sex with said friend's wife.


Uriah wasn't King David's best friend. He wasn't even a friend; he was a noble soldier in the king’s army.

And David didn't have Uriah killed in battle to have sex with his wife, Bathsheba. He already had sex with her and she got pregnant while Uriah was off fighting. He had Uriah killed because Uriah refused to sleep with Bathsheba after David granted him leave to come home for a few days. Obviously he wanted Uriah to have sex with Bathsheba and this would cover-up his adultery, but Uriah refused to sleep with her – or even eat & drink in their abode – not while his fellow soldiers were camped in the open fields. It was a matter of honor. So David had him killed in battle; that way (supposedly) no one would know that he didn’t sleep with Bathsheba on leave.

reply

Also, wasn't David lovers with Jonathan? Dude was a sex machine.

reply

The nature of their relationship was close friends and not homosexual. How do we know this for sure? Because homosexuality was expressly forbidden by the Mosaic Law and David is described as "a man after God's own heart" in the Bible (1 Samuel 13:14 & Acts 13:22), which explains why the LORD specifically chose him to replace Saul as King of Israel.

Secondly, the Scriptures never describe their relationship in terms of "sleeping together," as is the case when David committed adultery with Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:4). Nor is their any reference to the two "knowing" each other in a sexual sense (Genesis 4:1, Genesis 19:5  & Judges 19:22).

So, David and Jonathan's relationship was a platonic friendship of exceptional loyalty and commitment, which was rare amongst males in that culture, but even rarer between men and women. In that day, males in the Near East typically viewed women as inferiors and considered wives as their possessions (that said, the great Deborah led Israel for four decades politically, spiritually, militarily and judicially, as disclosed in Judges 4).

Jonathan loved David as himself, sharing his personal possessions, such as his tunic, robe, bow and sword, which were valuable property to military personnel (1 Samuel 18:1-4). Their covenant of loyal friendship was evident when Jonathan had to defend David from his own father, King Saul (1 Samuel 19:4-7).

All of this helps one properly interpret David's grieving words over Jonathan in 2 Samuel 1:26.

reply